next up previous [pdf]

Next: Uniform jittered undersampling on Up: Fourier-domain undersampling artifacts Previous: Random undersampling according to

The practical requirement of maximum gap control

As shown in the previous section, random undersampling according to a discrete uniform distribution creates favorable recovery conditions for a reconstruction procedure that promotes sparsity in the Fourier domain. However, a global transform such as the Fourier transform does not typically permit a sparse representation for complex seismic wavefields (Hennenfent and Herrmann, 2006). It requires a more local transform, e.g., windowed Fourier (Zwartjes and Sacchi, 2007) or curvelet (Herrmann and Hennenfent, 2007) transform. In this case, problems arise with gaps in the data that are larger than the spatio-temporal extent of the transform elements (Trad et al., 2005). Consequently, undersampling schemes with no control on the size of the maximum gap, e.g., random undersampling according to a discrete uniform distribution, become less attractive. The term gap refers here to the interval between two adjacent acquired traces minus the interval associated with the fine interpolation grid, such that adequate sampling has gaps of zero. We present an undersampling scheme that has, under some specific conditions, an anti-aliasing effect, yet offering control on the size of the maximum gap.
next up previous [pdf]

Next: Uniform jittered undersampling on Up: Fourier-domain undersampling artifacts Previous: Random undersampling according to

2007-11-27