@conference {gahlot2024IMAGEdt,
	title = {A Digital Twin for Geological Carbon Storage with Controlled Injectivity},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2024},
	month = {8},
	abstract = {We present an uncertainty-aware Digital Twin (DT) for geologic carbon storage (GCS), capable of handling multimodal time-lapse data and controlling CO2 injectivity to mitigate reservoir fracturing risks. In GCS, DT represents virtual replicas of subsurface systems that incorporate real-time data and advanced generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) techniques, including neural posterior density estimation via simulation-based inference and sequential Bayesian inference. These methods enable the effective monitoring and control of CO2 storage projects, addressing challenges such as subsurface complexity, operational optimization, and risk mitigation. By integrating diverse monitoring data, e.g., geophysical well observations and imaged seismic, DT can bridge the gaps between seemingly distinct fields like geophysics and reservoir engineering. In addition, the recent advancements in genAI also facilitate DT with principled uncertainty quantification. Through recursive training and inference, DT utilizes simulated current state samples, e.g., CO2 saturation, paired with corresponding geophysical field observations to train its neural networks and enable posterior sampling upon receiving new field data. However, it lacks decision-making and control capabilities, which is necessary for full DT functionality. This study aims to demonstrate how DT can inform decision-making processes to prevent risks such as cap rock fracturing during CO2 storage operations.},
	keywords = {Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, control, deep learning, digital twin, GCS, IMAGE, SEG, sequential Bayes, Uncertainty quantification},
	doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2403.19819},
	url = {https://slimgroup.github.io/IMAGE2024/GahlotLi2024SEG/paper.html},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Haoyun Li and Ziyi Yin and Rafael Orozco and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {herrmann2023SCAIMact,
	title = {Act normal that{\textquoteright}s crazy enough {\textemdash} an overview of seismic inversion with normalizing flows and surrogate modeling},
	year = {2023},
	note = {(SCAIM, Vancover)},
	month = {03},
	abstract = {During this talk, I will give an overview on how techniques from neural (conditional) density estimation and surrogate modeling can be used to solve challenging problems in seismic imaging and monitoring of geological carbon storage. I will start by outlining how (conditional) normalizing flows can be used as priors, to regularize inverse problems, and as low-fidelity amortized posteriors for wave-based inversions. To this end, I will uss techniques from simulation-based inference. When time, permits I will also talk about permeability inversion from time-lapse seismic data using neural surrogates (Fourier Neural Operators) to mimic solution operators of two-phase flow equations.},
	keywords = {CCS, FNO, GCS, monitoring, Normalizing flows, SCAIM, sequential Bayes, SLIM, surrogate, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SCAIM/2023/herrmann2023SCAIMact/index.html},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {yu2022ML4SEISMICmsb,
	title = {Monitoring with sequential Bayesian inference},
	year = {2022},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {For this study, we apply sequential Bayesian inference to monitor the time evolution of subsurface flow of CO2 from indirect acoustic measurements at the surface. Upon receiving new acoustic measurements, we infer the current state of the CO2 by sampling from a learned posterior. Using the incoming data, we then perform online updates of the current posterior. This is accomplished by using the fluid flow model to advance the estimated state variable forward in time in order to update the learned posterior. With a synthetic experiment, we demonstrate this method can track the flow evolution accurately as measured by PSNR metrics. Since the posterior is a learned network, we can compute estimates faster than traditional least squares methods. This method can also quantify the uncertainty due to stochasticity in fluid flow model and the limited-azimuth imaging configuration.},
	keywords = {CCS, conditional normalizing flows, GCS, ML4SEISMIC, monitoring, sequential Bayes, SLIM, time-lapse, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2022/yu2022ML4SEISMICmsb/index.html},
	author = {Ting-ying Yu and Rafael Orozco and Ziyi Yin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
