@presentation {louboutin2022ML4SEISMIClew,
	title = {Learned extensions for wave-based simulation and inversion},
	year = {2022},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {We introduce a new method that explores velocities as an operator (extended velocities) for wave-equation based inversion. Through this extended formulation, we obtain the known benefits of working with subsurface offset volumes. The offset-dependence of these volumes has been studied in the linear case, i.e as part of extended Born scattering and extended least-squares reverse-time migration, but has been avoided for non-linear inversion due to computational concderns and challenges. By using techniques from randomized linear algebra, we will show that we can work with extended velocities for inversion while maintaining an acceptable computational cost much lower than solving one PDE per extended velocity model.},
	keywords = {deep learning, Imaging, ML4SEISMIC, SLIM, wave equation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2022/louboutin2022ML4SEISMIClew/index.html},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Yadhu Kartha and Rafael Orozco and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {rizzuti2020dfw,
	title = {A dual formulation of wavefield reconstruction inversion for large-scale seismic inversion},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {86},
	number = {6},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1ND-Z3},
	abstract = {Many of the seismic inversion techniques currently proposed that focus on robustness with respect to the background model choice are not apt to large-scale 3D applications, and the methods that are computationally feasible for industrial problems, such as full waveform inversion, are notoriously limited by convergence stagnation and require adequate starting models. We propose a novel solution that is both scalable and less sensitive to starting models or inaccurate parameters (such as anisotropy) that are typically kept fixed during inversion. It is based on a dual reformulation of the classical wavefield reconstruction inversion, whose empirical robustness with respect to these issues is well documented in the literature. While the classical version is not suited to 3D, as it leverages expensive frequency-domain solvers for the wave equation, our proposal allows the deployment of state-of-the-art time-domain finite-difference methods, and is potentially mature for industrial-scale problems.},
	keywords = {3D, finite-difference, Full-waveform inversion, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2020-0743.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2021/rizzuti2020dfw/rizzuti2020dfw.html},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {siahkoohi2019TRnna,
	title = {Neural network augmented wave-equation simulation},
	number = {TR-CSE-2019-1},
	year = {2019},
	month = {09},
	institution = {Georgia Institute of Technology},
	abstract = {Accurate forward modeling is important for solving inverse problems. An inaccurate wave-equation simulation, as a forward operator, will offset the results obtained via inversion. In this work, we consider the case where we deal with incomplete physics. One proxy of incomplete physics is an inaccurate discretization of Laplacian in simulation of wave equation via finite-difference method. We exploit intrinsic one-to-one similarities between timestepping algorithm with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and propose to intersperse CNNs between low-fidelity timesteps. Augmenting neural networks with low-fidelity timestepping algorithms may allow us to take large timesteps while limiting the numerical dispersion artifacts. While simulating the wave-equation with low-fidelity timestepping algorithm, by correcting the wavefield several time during propagation, we hope to limit the numerical dispersion artifact introduced by a poor discretization of the Laplacian. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate this principle by correcting for numerical dispersion by keeping the velocity model fixed, and varying the source locations to generate training and testing pairs for our supervised learning algorithm.},
	keywords = {deep learning, finite difference, wave equation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2019/siahkoohi2019TRnna/siahkoohi2019TRnna.html},
	url2 = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.00925.pdf},
	author = {Ali Siahkoohi and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2018SEGada,
	title = {A debiasing approach to microseismic},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2942-2946},
	abstract = {Microseismic data is often used to locate fracture locations and their origin in time created by fracking. Although surface microseismic data can have large apertures and is easier to acquire than the borehole data, it often suffers from poor signal to noise ratio (S/R). Poor S/R poses a challenge in terms of estimating the correct location and source-time function of a microseismic source. In this work, we propose a denoising step in combination with a computationally cheap debiasing based approach to locate microseismic sources and to estimate their source-time functions with correct amplitude from extremely noisy data. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our method can work with closely spaced microseismic sources with source-time functions of different peak amplitudes and frequencies. We have also shown the ability of our method with the smooth velocity model.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Imaging, microseismic, noise, SEG, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2997252.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/sharan2018SEGada/sharan2018SEGada.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/sharan2018SEGada/sharan2018SEGada_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rajiv Kumar and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2018IEEEIUSspoa,
	title = {Sparsity-promoting photoacoustic imaging with source estimation},
	booktitle = {2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(IEEE IUS, Kobe)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {206-212},
	abstract = {Photoacoustics has emerged as a high-contrast imaging modality that provides optical absorption maps inside of tissues, therefore complementing morphological information of conventional ultrasound. The laser-generated photoacoustic waves are usually envelope-detected, thus disregarding the specific waveforms generated by each photoabsorber. Here we propose a sparsity-promoting image reconstruction method that allows the estimation of each photoabsorber{\textquoteright}s source-time function. Preliminary studies showed the ability to reconstruct the optical absorption map of an in silico vessel phantom. By using a sparsity-promoting imaging method, absorption maps and source-time functions can still be recovered even in situations where the number of transducers is decreased by a factor of six. Moreover, the recovery is able to attain higher resolution than conventional beamforming methods. Because our method recovers the source-time function of the absorbers, it could potentially also be used to distinguish different types of photoabsorbers, or the degree of aggregation of exogenous agents, under the assumption that these would generate different source-time functions at the moment of laser irradiation.},
	keywords = {Acceleration, estimation, IEEE, Image reconstruction, Phantoms, photoacoustic imaging, source-time function, sparsity promoting inversion, Transducers, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1109/ULTSYM.2018.8580037},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IEEEIUS/2018/sharan2018IEEEIUSspoa/sharan2018IEEEIUSspoa.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IEEEIUS/2018/sharan2018IEEEIUSspoa/sharan2018IEEEIUSspoa_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rajiv Kumar and Diego S. Dumani and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Stanislav Emelianov and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2017SEGhrf,
	title = {High resolution fast microseismic source collocation and source time function estimation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(SEG, Houston)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {2778-2783},
	abstract = {Sparsity promotion based joint microseismic source collocation and source time function estimation, using Linearized Bregman algorithm, although simple to implement, suffers from slow convergence. This is due to the fact that Linearized Bregman algorithm has only first order of convergence. In this work, we propose to accelerate the existing Linearized Bregman algorithm using the L-BFGS algorithm. Without any initial guess for the source location or source time function, our method is able to estimate the source location and source time function for kinematically correct smooth velocity model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for multiple sources spaced within half a wavelength. We also compare our results with Linearized Bregman based method in {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}2.5{\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}D instead of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}2{\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}D.},
	keywords = {algorithm, Full-waveform inversion, microseismic, passive imaging, SEG, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2017-17787749.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2017/sharan2017SEGhrf/sharan2017SEGhrf.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2017/sharan2017SEGhrf/sharan2017SEGhrf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {fang2017WAVESuqf,
	title = {Uncertainty quantification for inverse problems with a weak wave-equation constraint},
	booktitle = {WAVES 2017 {\textendash}- 13th International Conference on Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(WAVES, Minneapolis)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {127-128},
	abstract = {In this work, we present a new posterior distribution to quantify uncertainties in solutions of wave-equation based inverse problems. By introducing an auxiliary variable for the wavefields, we weaken the strict wave-equation constraint used by conventional Bayesian approaches. With this weak constraint, the new posterior distribution is a bi-Gaussian distribution with respect to both model parameters and wavefields, which can be directly sampled by the Gibbs sampling method.},
	keywords = {constraint, Gibbs sampling, uncertainty, wave equation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/WAVES/2017/fang2017WAVESuqf/fang2017WAVESuqf.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/WAVES/2017/fang2017WAVESuqf/fang2017WAVESuqf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Curt Da Silva and Rachel Kuske and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2016SEGspj,
	title = {Sparsity-promoting joint microseismic source collocation and source-time function estimation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2574-2579},
	abstract = {In this work, we propose a new method to simultaneously locate microseismic events (e.g., induced by hydraulic fracturing) and estimate the source signature of these events. We use the method of linearized Bregman. This algorithm focuses unknown sources at their true locations by promoting sparsity along space and at the same time keeping the energy along time in check. We are particularly interested in situations where the microseismic data is noisy, sources have different signatures and we only have access to the smooth background-velocity model. We perform numerical experiments to demonstrate the usability of the proposed method. We also compare our results with full-waveform inversion based microseismic event collocation methods. Our method gives flexibility to simultaneously get a more accurate source image along with an estimate of the source-time function, which carries important information on the rupturing process and source mechanism.},
	keywords = {microseismic, noise, SEG, sources, sparse, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13871022.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/sharan2016SEGspj/sharan2016SEGspj.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/sharan2016SEGspj/sharan2016SEGspj_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rongrong Wang and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@mastersthesis {petrenko2014THaih,
	title = {Accelerating an iterative Helmholtz solver using reconfigurable hardware},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(MSc)},
	month = {04},
	school = {The University of British Columbia},
	type = {masters},
	address = {Vancouver},
	abstract = {An implementation of seismic wave simulation on a platform consisting of a conventional host processor and a reconfigurable hardware accelerator is presented. This research is important in the field of exploration for oil and gas resources, where a 3D model of the subsurface of the Earth is frequently required. By comparing seismic data collected in a real-world survey with synthetic data generated by simulated waves, it is possible to deduce such a model. However this requires many time-consuming simulations with different Earth models to find the one that best fits the measured data. Speeding up the wave simulations would allow more models to be tried, yielding a more accurate estimate of the subsurface. The reconfigurable hardware accelerator employed in this work is a field programmable gate array (FPGA). FPGAs are computer chips that consist of electronic building blocks that the user can configure and reconfigure to represent their algorithm in hardware. Whereas a traditional processor can be viewed as a pipeline for processing instructions, an FPGA is a pipeline for processing data. The chief advantage of the FPGA is that all the instructions in the algorithm are already hardwired onto the chip. This means that execution time depends only on the amount of data to be processed, and not on the complexity of the algorithm. The main contribution is an implementation of the well-known Kaczmarz row projection algorithm on the FPGA, using techniques of dataflow programming. This kernel is used as the preconditioning step of CGMN, a modified version of the conjugate gradients method that is used to solve the time-harmonic acoustic isotropic constant density wave equation. Using one FPGA-based accelerator, the current implementation allows seismic wave simulations to be performed over twice as fast, compared to running on one Intel Xeon E5-2670 core. I also discuss the effect of modifications of the algorithm necessitated by the hardware on the convergence properties of CGMN. Finally, a specific plan for future work is set-out in order to fully exploit the accelerator platform, and the work is set in its larger context.},
	keywords = {CG, CGMN, FPGA, Helmholtz, Kaczmarz, linear solver, Maxeler, MSc, thesis, wave equation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2014/petrenko2014THaih/petrenko2014THaih.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2014/petrenko2014THaih/petrenko2014THaih_pres.pdf},
	author = {Art Petrenko}
}
