@conference {erdinc2025ML4SEISMICpbi,
	title = {Power-scaled Bayesian inference for velocity-model estimation},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Score-based generative models have emerged as powerful tools for conditional generation in Bayesian inference. While promising, a common criticism of these methods is their reliance on strong, structured priors, which can dominate the inference process and limit the network{\textquoteright}s dependence on observed data. To address this issue, we propose a modification to the generative sampling algorithm that incorporates power scaling of both priors and likelihoods. Our approach enables flexible control over the relative influence of the prior and likelihood without requiring retraining for different scaling configurations. We demonstrate this in the context of synthesizing seismic velocity models conditioned on imaged seismic data. By sampling from intermediate power posteriors, our method naturally supports sensitivity analysis and allows us to assess how varying prior and likelihood weights determines the behavior of the posterior. Through a comprehensive set of experiments, we examine the impact of the power parameters in three scenarios: scaling only the prior, scaling only the likelihood, and scaling both simultaneously. The results show that increasing the likelihood power up to a certain threshold improves the fidelity of posterior samples to the conditioning data, while reducing prior power increases structural diversity in the generated models. Furthermore, moderate likelihood scaling leads to reduced shot data residuals, demonstrating its effectiveness for posterior refinement.},
	keywords = {Bayesian inference, deep learning, generative model, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, power-scaling, RTM, score, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/erdinc2025ML4SEISMICpbi},
	author = {Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Yunlin Zeng and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {erdinc2025IMAGEpbi,
	title = {Power-scaled Bayesian inference with score-based generative models},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2025},
	month = {8},
	keywords = {Bayesian inference, deep learning, generative model, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, power-scaling, RTM, score, SEG, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2504.10807},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/erdinc2025IMAGEpbi},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/erdinc2025IMAGEpbi/IMAGE_Tuna.pdf},
	author = {Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Yunlin Zeng and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {henriksson2025ML4SEISMICpss,
	title = {Predicting Subsurface CO2 Saturation using Late Fusion of Seismic and Streaming Well Data},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Determining subsurface flow of CO2 in porous rock formations is a challenging task especially when it involves intergration of multimodal data that are collected at disparate timescales. In this work, we investigate how data fushion can be used to integrate multimodal data consisting on infrequently collected active-source seismic surveys and continuous streaming data of saturation measurements collected at monitoring wells. For the purpose, we propose a data fusion framework based on late fusion, which combines seismic images, computed from seismic surveys, with time-series data collected at the wells. By integrating the spatial information from seismic data with high-resolution but sparce spatial-temporal patterns from wells, we aim to better approximate the complex CO2 flow patterns.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, late fusion, ML4SEISMIC, permeability, reservoir simulation, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/henriksson2025ML4SEISMICpss},
	author = {Victor Henriksson and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@unpublished {deng2025EAGEpjrm,
	title = {Probabilistic Joint Recovery Method for CO2 Plume Monitoring},
	year = {2025},
	month = {6},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, deep learning, FWI, GCS, igm, image generative model, Imaging, Inverse problems, JRM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2501.18761},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2025/deng2025EAGEpjrm/EAGE_Venice.pdf},
	author = {Zijun Deng and Rafael Orozco and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {deng2024ML4SEISMICpjr,
	title = {Probabilistic Joint Recovery Method for CO2 plume monitoring},
	year = {2024},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Accurately predicting fluid flow patterns in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a challenging task, particularly due to uncertainties in CO 2  plume dynamics and reservoir properties. While previous deterministic methods such as the Joint Recovery Method (JRM) have provided valuable insights, their effectiveness is limited as tools for decision-making since they do not communicate uncertainty. To address this, we propose a Probabilistic Joint Recovery Method (PJRM) that computes the posterior distribution at each monitoring survey while leveraging the shared structure among surveys through a common generative model. By efficiently computing posterior distributions for each monitoring survey, this method aims to provide valuable uncertainty information to decision-makers in CCS projects, augmenting their workflow with principled risk minimization.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, deep learning, FWI, igm, image generative model, Imaging, Inverse problems, JRM, ML4SEISMIC, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2024/deng2024ML4SEISMICpjr},
	author = {Zijun Deng and Rafael Orozco and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {vanleeuwen2012SEGparallel,
	title = {A parallel, object-oriented framework for frequency-domain wavefield imaging and inversion.},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2012-2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {04},
	institution = {Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences},
	address = {University of British Columbia, Vancouver},
	abstract = {We present a parallel object-oriented matrix-free framework for frequency-domain seismic modeling, imaging and inversion. The key aspects of the framework are its modularity and level of abstraction, which allows us to write code that reflects the underlying mathematical structure and develop unit-tests that guarantee the fidelity of the code. By overloading standard linear-algebra operations, such as matrix-vector multiplications, we can use standard optimization packages to work with our code without any modification. This leads to a scalable testbed on which new methods can be rapidly prototyped and tested on medium-sized 2D problems. Although our current implementation uses (parallel) Matlab, all of these design principles can also be met by using lower-level languages which is important when we want to scale to realistic 3D problems. We present some numerical examples on synthetic data.},
	keywords = {Imaging, inversion, Modeling, SEG},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2012/vanleeuwen2012SEGparallel/vanleeuwen2012SEGparallel.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011SEGext,
	title = {Probing the extended image volume},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4045-4050},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {The prestack image volume can be defined as a cross- correlation of the source and receivers wavefields for non-zero space and time lags. If the background velocity is kinemati- cally acceptable, this image volume will have its main contributions at zero lag, even for complex models. Thus, it is an ideal tool for wave-equation migration velocity analysis in the presence of strong lateral heterogeneity. In particular, it allows us to pose migration velocity analysis as a PDE-constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the energy in the image volume at non-zero lag subject to fitting the data approximately. However, it is computationally infeasi- ble to explicitly form the whole image volume. In this paper, we discuss several ways to reduce the computational costs involved in computing the image volume and evaluating the focusing criterion. We reduce the costs for calculating the data by randomized source synthesis. We also present an efficient way to subsample the image volume. Finally, we propose an alternative optimization criterion and suggest a multiscale inversion strategy for wave-equation MVA.},
	keywords = {Imaging, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3628051},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/vanleeuwen11SEGext/vanleeuwen11SEGext.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
