@conference {peters2019SEGans,
	title = {A numerical solver for least-squares sub-problems in 3D wavefield reconstruction inversion and related problem formulations},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SEG, San Antonio)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1536-1540},
	abstract = {Recent years saw a surge of interest in seismic waveform inversion approaches based on quadratic-penalty or augmented-Lagrangian methods, including Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion. These methods typically need to solve a least-squares sub-problem that contains a discretization of the Helmholtz equation. Memory requirements for direct solvers are often prohibitively large in three dimensions, and this limited the examples in the literature to two dimensions. We present an algorithm that uses iterative Helmholtz solvers as a black-box to solve the least-squares problem corresponding to 3D grids. This algorithm enables Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion and related formulations, in three dimensions. Our new algorithm also includes a root-finding method to convert a penalty into a constraint on the data-misfit without additional computational cost, by reusing precomputed quantities. Numerical experiments show that the cost of parallel communication and other computations are small compared to the main cost of solving one Helmholtz problem per source and one per receiver.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, least-squares, numerical linear algebra, penalty method, quadratic constraints, root finding, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2019-3216638.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/peters2019SEGans/peters2019SEGans.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/peters2019SEGans/peters2019SEGans_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2012SEGST,
	title = {On non-uniqueness of the Student{\textquoteright}s t-formulation for linear inverse problems},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2012},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-5},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {We review the statistical interpretation of inverse problem formulations, and the motivations for selecting non-convex penalties for robust behaviour with respect to measurement outliers or artifacts in the data. An important downside of using non-convex formulations such as the Student{\textquoteright}s t is the potential for non-uniqueness, and we present a simple example where the Student{\textquoteright}s t penalty can be made to have many local minima by appropriately selecting the degrees of freedom parameter. On the other hand, the non-convexity of the Student{\textquoteright}s t is precisely what gives it the ability to ignore artifacts in the data. We explain this idea, and present a stylized imaging experiment, where the Student{\textquoteright}s t is able to recover a velocity perturbation from data contaminated by a very peculiar artifact {\textendash}- data from a different velocity perturbation. The performance of Student{\textquoteright}s t inversion is investigated empirically for different values of the degrees of freedom parameter, and different initial conditions.},
	keywords = {non-convex, robust, SEG, Student{\textquoteright}s t, uniqueness},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2012-1558.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/aravkin2012SEGST/aravkin2012SEGST.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Kenneth Bube and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
