@conference {zeng2024IMAGEefw,
	title = {Enhancing Full-Waveform Variational Inference through Stochastic Resampling and Data Augmentation},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2024},
	month = {8},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, CIG, conditional normalizing flows, deep learning, FWI, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, MVA, RTM, SEG, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slimgroup.github.io/IMAGE2024/Yunlin_Zeng2024SEG/paper.html},
	author = {Yunlin Zeng and Rafael Orozco and Ziyi Yin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {erdinc2023IMAGEecl,
	title = {Enhancing CO2 Leakage Detectability via Dataset Augmentation},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2023},
	note = {(IMAGE, Houston)},
	month = {08},
	abstract = {Previous work showed that neural classifiers can be trained to detect CO2 leakage from time-lapse seismic images. While this result is crucial to the global deployment of geological carbon storage (GCS), its success depends on relatively dense non-replicated time-lapse data acquisition. In this study, we show that by augmenting the training set with various coarse receiver samplings and corresponding seismic images, we can improve the leakage detection capabilities and accuracy while increasing the robustness with respect to low-cost coarse receiver samplings, e.g. ocean bottom nodes (OBNs).},
	keywords = {CCS, classifier, deep learning, leakage detection, SEG},
	url = {https://slimgroup.github.io/IMAGE2023/DetectabilityWithVision/abstract.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2023/erdinc2023IMAGEecl},
	author = {Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kumar2021SEGeuq,
	title = {Enabling uncertainty quantification for seismic data pre-processing using normalizing flows (NF){\textemdash}an interpolation example},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(IMAGE, Denver)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1515-1519},
	abstract = {Seismic data go through a sequence of pre-processing steps before being made into an image. Although some work has been done to assess the uncertainties in the final images, how the uncertainty in the pre-processing affects the results remains largely unexplored. We use Normalizing Flows (NF), a type of deep neural network, to interpolate seismic data and quantify the associated uncertainty. A big advantage of NFs, over the more commonly used Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, is that they can successfully sample a complex and high-dimensional probability space with fewer assumptions. We present the first application of NF in interpolating (synthetic) seismic data. The statistical measurements retrieved from the network can be used to better characterize the data as it is passed to the post-processing phase.},
	keywords = {deep learning, normalizing flow, SEG, wavefield reconstruction},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2021-3583705.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/kumar2021SEGeuq/kumar2021SEGeuq.pdf},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/Software.SEG2021},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Maria Kotsi and Ali Siahkoohi and Alison Malcolm}
}
@conference {yin2020SEGesi,
	title = {Extended source imaging {\textendash}- a unifying framework for seismic and medical imaging},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2020},
	note = {(SEG, virtual)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {3502-3506},
	abstract = {We present three imaging modalities that live on the crossroads of seismic and medical imaging. Through the lens of extended source imaging, we can draw deep connections among the fields of wave-equation based seismic and medical imaging, despite first appearances. From the seismic perspective, we underline the importance to work with the correct physics and spatially varying velocity fields. Medical imaging, on the other hand, opens the possibility for new imaging modalities where outside stimuli, such as laser or radar pulses, can not only be used to identify endogenous optical or thermal contrasts but that these sources can also be used to insonify the medium so that images of the whole specimen can in principle be created.},
	keywords = {medical imaging, SEG, seismic imaging, variable projection},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2020-3426999.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2020/yin2020SEGesi/yin2020SEGesi.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2020/yin2020SEGesi/yin2020SEGesi_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2020/yin2020SEGesi/yin2020SEGesi_pres.mp4},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/Software.SEG2020},
	author = {Ziyi Yin and Rafael Orozco and Philipp A. Witte and Mathias Louboutin and Gabrio Rizzuti and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {witte2019SEGedw,
	title = {Event-driven workflows for large-scale seismic imaging in the cloud},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SEG, San Antonio)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {3984-3988},
	abstract = {Cloud computing has seen a large rise in popularity in recent years and is becoming a cost effective alternative to on-premise computing, with theoretically unlimited scalability. However, so far little progress has been made in adapting the cloud for high performance computing (HPC) tasks, such as seismic imaging and inversion. As the cloud does not provide the same type of fast and reliable connections as conventional HPC clusters, porting legacy codes developed for HPC environments to the cloud is ineffective and misses out on an opportunity to take advantage of new technologies presented by the cloud. We present a novel approach of bringing seismic imaging and inversion workflows to the cloud, which does not rely on a traditional HPC environment, but is based on serverless and event-driven computations. Computational resources are assigned dynamically in response to events, thus minimizing idle time and providing resilience to hardware failures. We test our workflow on two large-scale imaging examples and demonstrate that cost-effective HPC in the cloud is possible, but requires careful reconsiderations of how to bring software to the cloud.},
	keywords = {cloud, Imaging, large-scale, LS-RTM, RTM, SEG, workflow},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2019-3215069.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/witte2019SEGedw/witte2019SEGedw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/witte2019SEGedw/witte2019SEGedw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Philipp A. Witte and Mathias Louboutin and Henryk Modzelewski and Charles Jones and James Selvage and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {louboutin2018SEGeow,
	title = {Effects of wrong adjoints for RTM in TTI media},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {331-335},
	abstract = {In order to obtain accurate images of the subsurface, anisotropic modeling and imaging is necessary. However, the twenty-one parameter complete wave-equation is too computationally expensive to be of use in this case. The transverse tilted isotropic wave-equation is then the next best feasible representation of the physics to use for imaging. The main complexity arising from transverse tilted isotropic imaging is to model the receiver wavefield (back propagation of the data or data residual) for the imaging condition. Unlike the isotropic or the full physics wave-equations, the transverse tilted isotropic wave-equation is not not self-adjoint. This difference means that time-reversal will not model the correct receiver wavefield and this can lead to incorrect subsurface images. In this work, we derive and implement the adjoint wave-equation to demonstrate the necessity of exact adjoint modeling for anisotropic modeling and compare our result with adjoint-free time-reversed imaging.},
	keywords = {Adjoint, anisotropy, finite-differences, Imaging, RTM, SEG, TTI},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2996274.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/louboutin2018SEGeow/louboutin2018SEGeow.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/louboutin2018SEGeow/louboutin2018SEGeow_pres.pdf},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Philipp A. Witte and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kumar2013SEGMVA,
	title = {Efficient WEMVA using extended images},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Advances in Model Building, Imaging, and FWI; Houston},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	abstract = {Image gathers as a function of subsurface offset are an important tool for velocity analysis in areas of complex geology. Here, we offer a new perspective on image gathers by organizing the extended image as a function of all subsurface offsets and all subsurface points in to a matrix whose (i,j)th entry captures the interaction between gridpoints i and j. For even small problems, it is infeasible to form and store this matrix. Instead, we propose an efficient algorithm to glean information from the image volume via efficient matrix-vector products. We illustrate how this can be used to construct objective functions for automated MVA.},
	keywords = {inversion, MVA, poster, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGMVA/kumar2013SEGMVA_poster.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {almatar10SEGesfd,
	title = {Estimation of surface-free data by curvelet-domain matched filtering and sparse inversion},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2010-1},
	year = {2010},
	institution = {Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences},
	address = {University of British Columbia, Vancouver},
	abstract = {Matching seismic wavefields and images lies at the heart of many pre-post-processing steps part of seismic imaging- whether one is matching predicted wavefield components, such as multiples, to the actual to-be-separated wavefield components present in the data or whether one is aiming to restore migration amplitudes by scaling, using an image-to-remigrated- image matching procedure to calculate the scaling coefficients. The success of these wavefield matching procedures depends on our ability to (i) control possible overfitting, which may lead to accidental removal of energy or to inaccurate image-amplitude corrections, (ii) handle data or images with nonunique dips, and (iii) apply subsequent wavefield separations or migraton amplitude corrections stably. In this paper, we show that the curvelet transform allows us to address all these issues by im- posing smoothness in phase space, by using their capability to handle conflicting dips, and by leveraging their ability to represent seismic data and images sparsely. This latter property renders curvelet-domain sparsity promotion an effective prior.},
	keywords = {SEG},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/almatar10SEGesfd/almatar10SEGesfd.pdf},
	author = {Mufeed H. AlMatar and Tim T.Y. Lin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
