@conference {yin2023IMAGEcpi,
	title = {Coupled physics inversion for geological carbon storage monitoring},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2023},
	note = {(IMAGE, Houston)},
	month = {08},
	abstract = {Understanding CO2 plume behavior is key to the success of geological carbon storage projects. While two-phase flow equations provide a good model to make predictions on future CO2 plume behavior, these equations rely on having access to the true permeability model. Unfortunately, accurate information on the permeability is unavailable, which greatly jeopardizes our ability to predict CO2 plume behavior. To overcome this problem, we estimate the permeability from time-lapse seismic data via a coupled inversion methodology that improve as more monitoring data becomes available over time.},
	keywords = {CCS, coupled inversion, end-to-end, fluid-flow, inversion, monitoring, SEG},
	url = {https://slimgroup.github.io/IMAGE2023/yin2023IMAGEend2end/abstract.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2023/yin2023IMAGEcpi},
	author = {Ziyi Yin and Mathias Louboutin and Olav M{\o}yner and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {yin2021SEGcts,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse seismic monitoring of carbon storage and sequestration with the joint recovery model},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(IMAGE, Denver)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {3434-3438},
	abstract = {Time-lapse seismic monitoring of carbon storage and sequestration is often challenging because the time-lapse signature of the growth of CO$_2$ plumes is weak in amplitude and therefore difficult to detect seismically. This situation is compounded by the fact that the surveys are often coarsely sampled and not replicated to reduce costs. As a result, images obtained for different vintages (baseline and monitor surveys) often contain artifacts that may be attributed wrongly to time-lapse changes. To address these issues, we propose to invert the baseline and monitor surveys jointly. By using the joint recovery model, we exploit information shared between multiple time-lapse surveys. Contrary to other time-lapse methods, our approach does not rely on replicating the surveys to detect time-lapse changes. To illustrate this advantage, we present a numerical sensitivity study where CO$_2$ is injected in a realistic synthetic model. This model is representative of the geology in the southeast of the North Sea, an area currently considered for carbon sequestration. Our example demonstrates that the joint recovery model improves the quality of time-lapse images allowing us to monitor the CO$_2$ plume seismically.},
	keywords = {CCS, Compressive Sensing, Imaging, JRM, marine, SEG, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2021-3569087.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/yin2021SEGcts/yin2021SEGcts.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/yin2021SEGcts/Tue-9-28-Yin.html},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/yin2021SEGcts/yin2021SEGcts.mp4},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/Software.SEG2021},
	author = {Ziyi Yin and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {moldoveanu2018SEGcsbdl,
	title = {Compressive sensing based design for land and OBS surveys: The noise issue},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {102-106},
	abstract = {Two important developments in seismic acquisition in the last decade were introduction of simultaneous shooting and reconstruction via inversion of the complete seismic wavefield. As the seismic wavefield is typically under sampled in at least one of the four spatial coordinates, both developments could contribute to improve the sampling and, in addition, to increase acquisition efficiency. Herein, we look at the impact of seismic noise when simultaneous shooting and seismic wavefield reconstruction are implemented for a land or ocean bottom seismic survey.},
	keywords = {SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2997759.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/moldoveanu2018SEGcsbdl/moldoveanu2018SEGcsbdl.pdf},
	author = {Nick Moldoveanu and Philip Bilsby and John Quigley and Rajiv Kumar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2016SEGWSctl,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Low cost geophysics: How to be creative in a cost-challenged environment; Dallas},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {Acquisition, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/herrmann2016SEGWSctl/herrmann2016SEGWSctl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason}
}
@conference {herrmann2016SEGWScvp,
	title = {Constraints versus penalties for edge-preserving full-waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Where are we heading with FWI; Dallas},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion is arguably one of the most challenging inverse problems out there. For this reason, it is remarkable that so much progress has been made over the years. While we can look back with confidence at an increasing number of success stories, the application of full-waveform technologies to deeper targets and complex geologies remains challenging making it an expensive proposition. So far, efforts to overcome some of these challenges have mainly been directed towards extended formulations such as Symes{\textquoteright}s and Biondi{\textquoteright}s subsurface offset/rau-parameters, Mike Warner/Lluis Guasch{\textquoteright}s Wiener filters in their adaptive full-waveform inversion, and van Leeuwen/Herrmann{\textquoteright}s Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion, where the wave-equation appears as a least-squares term in the objective. While this recent work {\textendash}- including other approaches such as different data-misfit objective functions {\textendash}- has removed some of FWI cycle-skip issues it does, with the exception perhaps of box constraints, not incorporate rudimentary information on the geology on the unknown model. Following recent work by Ernie Esser, we present a general framework how to incorporate this type of information in the form of constraints. Contrary to Tikhonov-like regularization or gradient filtering, imposing constraints has several key advantages, namely (i) they can be expressed in simple human understandable terms such as lower and upper limits for the velocity without the necessity to introduce additional parameters and assumptions on the probability distribution of the model; (ii) they can consist of several constraints, e.g. box and smoothness constraints, as long as their intersection in non-empty; and (iii) they can be imposed in a separate inner loop, which does not affect gradients and Hessians of full-waveform inversion itself. By means of examples, we will demonstrate the advocacy of constrained formulations as they apply to full-waveform inversion. This is joint work with Bas Peters.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/herrmann2016SEGWScvp/herrmann2016SEGWScvp_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {herrmann2015SEGWScse,
	title = {Compressive Sensing in Exploration Seismology - where we came from, where we are now, and where we need to go},
	booktitle = {SEG Geophysical Compressed Sensing Workshop; Beijing, China},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Beijing, China)},
	month = {12},
	keywords = {compressed sensing, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/herrmann2015SEGWScse/herrmann2015SEGWScse_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {tu2013SEGcle,
	title = {Controlling linearization errors in $\ell_1$ regularized inversion by rerandomization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4640-4644},
	abstract = {Linearized inversion is a data fitting procedure that tries to match the observed seismic data with data predicted by linearized modelling. In practice, the observed data is not necessarily in the column space of the linearized modelling operator. This can be caused by lack of an accurate background velocity model or by coherent noises not explained by linearized modelling. Through carefully designed experiments, we ob- serve that a moderate data mismatch does not pose an issue if we can use all the data in the inversion. However, artifacts do arise from the mismatch when randomized dimensionality reduction techniques are adopted to speed up the inversion. To stabilize the inversion for dimensionality reduction with randomized source aggregates, we propose to rerandomize by drawing independent simultaneous sources occasionally during the inversion. The effect of this rerandomization is remarkable because it results in virtually artifact-free images at a cost comparable to a single reverse-time migration. Implications of our method are profound because we are now able to resolve fine-scale steep subsalt features in a computationally feasible manner.},
	keywords = {inversion, message passing, rerandomization, SEG, sparsity},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1302.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGcle/tu2013SEGcle.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGcle/tu2013SEGcle_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ning Tu and Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2009SEGcib,
	title = {Compressive imaging by wavefield inversion with group sparsity},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2009},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2337-2341},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Migration relies on multi-dimensional correlations between source- and residual wavefields. These multi-dimensional correlations are computationally expensive because they involve operations with explicit and full matrices that contain both wavefields. By leveraging recent insights from compressive sampling, we present an alternative method where linear correlation-based imaging is replaced by imaging via multidimensional deconvolutions of compressibly sampled wavefields. Even though this approach goes at the expense of having to solve a sparsity-promotion recovery program for the image, our wavefield inversion approach has the advantage of reducing the system size in accordance to transform-domain sparsity of the image. Because seismic images also exhibit a focusing of the energy towards zero offset, the compressive-wavefield inversion itself is carried out using a recent extension of one-norm solver technology towards matrix-valued problems. These so-called hybrid $(1,\,2)$-norm solvers allow us to penalize pre-stack energy away from zero offset while exploiting joint sparsity amongst near-offset images. Contrary to earlier work to reduce modeling and imaging costs through random phase-encoded sources, our method compressively samples wavefields in model space. This approach has several advantages amongst which improved system-size reduction, and more flexibility during subsequent inversions for subsurface properties.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3255328},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2009/herrmann09SEGcib/herrmann09SEGcib.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2009/herrmann09SEGcib/herrmann09SEGcib_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {lin2009SEGcsf,
	title = {Compressive simultaneous full-waveform simulation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2009},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2577-2581},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {The fact that the computational complexity of wavefield simulation is proportional to the size of the discretized model and acquisition geometry, and not to the complexity of the simulated wavefield, is a major impediment within seismic imaging. By turning simulation into a compressive sensing problem{\textendash}where simulated data is recovered from a relatively small number of independent simultaneous sources{\textendash}we remove this impediment by showing that compressively sampling a simulation is equivalent to compressively sampling the sources, followed by solving a reduced system. As in compressive sensing, this allows for a reduction in sampling rate and hence in simulation costs. We demonstrate this principle for the time-harmonic Helmholtz solver. The solution is computed by inverting the reduced system, followed by a recovery of the full wavefield with a sparsity promoting program. Depending on the wavefield{\textquoteright}s sparsity, this approach can lead to a significant cost reduction, in particular when combined with the implicit preconditioned Helmholtz solver, which is known to converge even for decreasing mesh sizes and increasing angular frequencies. These properties make our scheme a viable alternative to explicit time-domain finite-difference.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3255381},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2009/Lin09SEGcsf/Lin09SEGcsf.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2009/Lin09SEGcsf/Lin09SEGcsf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tim T.Y. Lin and Yogi A. Erlangga and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {shahidi2009SEGcmf,
	title = {Curvelet-domain matched filtering with frequency-domain regularization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {28},
	year = {2009},
	month = {10},
	pages = {3645-3649},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {In Herrmann et al. (2008), it is shown that zero-order pseudodifferential operators, which model the migration-demigration operator and the operator mapping the predicted multiples to the true multiples, can be represented by a diagonal weighting in the curvelet domain. In that paper, a smoothness constraint was introduced in the phase space of the operator in order to regularize the solution to make it unique. In this paper, we use recent results in Demanet and Ying (2008) on the discrete symbol calculus to impose a further smoothness constraint, this time in the frequency domain. It is found that with this additional constraint, faster convergence is realized. Results on a synthetic pseudodifferential operator as well as on an example of primary-multiple separation in seismic data are included, comparing the model with and without the new smoothness constraint, from which it is found that results of improved quality are also obtained.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3255624},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2009/shahidi09SEGcmf/shahidi09segcmf.pdf},
	author = {Reza Shahidi and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {moghaddam2008SEGcbm,
	title = {Curvelet-based migration preconditioning},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {27},
	year = {2008},
	month = {11},
	pages = {2211-2215},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {In this paper, we introduce a preconditioner for seismic imaging{\textendash}-i.e., the inversion of the linearized Born scattering operator. This preconditioner approximately corrects for the {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}square root{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} of the normal{\textendash}-i.e., the demigration-migration operator. This approach consists of three parts, namely (i) a left preconditoner, defined by a fractional time integration designed to make the migration operator zero order, and two right preconditioners that apply (ii) a scaling in the physical domain accounting for a spherical spreading, and (iii) a curvelet-domain scaling that corrects for spatial and reflector-dip dependent amplitude errors. We show that a combination of these preconditioners lead to a significant improvement of the convergence for iterative least-squares solutions to the seismic imaging problem based on reverse-time migration operators.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3059325},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2008/moghaddam08SEGcbm/moghaddam08SEGcbm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2008/moghaddam08SEGcbm/moghaddam08SEGcbm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Peyman P. Moghaddam and Cody R. Brown and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2008SEGcdm,
	title = {Curvelet-domain matched filtering},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {27},
	number = {3643-3649},
	year = {2008},
	month = {08},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Matching seismic wavefields and images lies at the heart of many pre-/post-processing steps part of seismic imaging{\textendash}- whether one is matching predicted wavefield components, such as multiples, to the actual to-be-separated wavefield components present in the data or whether one is aiming to restore migration amplitudes by scaling, using an image-to-remigrated-image matching procedure to calculate the scaling coefficients. The success of these wavefield matching procedures depends on our ability to (i) control possible overfitting, which may lead to accidental removal of energy or to inaccurate image-amplitude corrections, (ii) handle data or images with nonunique dips, and (iii) apply subsequent wavefield separations or migraton amplitude corrections stably. In this paper, we show that the curvelet transform allows us to address all these issues by imposing smoothness in phase space, by using their capability to handle conflicting dips, and by leveraging their ability to represent seismic data and images sparsely. This latter property renders curvelet-domain sparsity promotion an effective prior.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2008/herrmann08SEGcdm/herrmann08SEGcdm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2008/herrmann08SEGcdm/herrmann08SEGcdm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Peyman P. Moghaddam and Deli Wang}
}
@conference {herrmann2008SEGcdm3,
	title = {Curvelet-domain matched filtering},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {27},
	year = {2008},
	month = {11},
	pages = {3643-3649},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Matching seismic wavefields lies at the heart of seismic processing whether one is adaptively subtracting multiples predictions or groundroll. In both cases, the predictions are matched to the actual to-be-separated wavefield components in the observed data. The success of these wavefield matching procedures depends on our ability to (i) control possible overfitting, which may lead to accidental removal of primary energy, (ii) handle data with nonunique dips, and (iii) apply wavefield separation after matching stably. In this paper, we show that the curvelet transform allows us to address these issues by imposing smoothness in phase space, by using their capability to handle conflicting dips, and by leveraging their ability to represent seismic data sparsely.},
	keywords = {SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3064089},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2008/Herrmann08SEGcdm3/Herrmann08SEGcdm3.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {lin2007SEGcwe1,
	title = {Compressed wavefield extrapolation with curvelets},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {1997-2001},
	abstract = {An explicit algorithm for the extrapolation of one-way wavefields is proposed which combines recent developments in information theory and theoretical signal processing with the physics of wave propagation. Because of excessive memory requirements, explicit formulations for wave propagation have proven to be a challenge in 3-D. By using ideas from {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}compressed sensing{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}, we are able to formulate the (inverse) wavefield extrapolation problem on small subsets of the data volume, thereby reducing the size of the operators. According to compressed sensing theory, signals can successfully be recovered from an imcomplete set of measurements when the measurement basis is incoherent with the representation in which the wavefield is sparse. In this new approach, the eigenfunctions of the Helmholtz operator are recognized as a basis that is incoherent with curvelets that are known to compress seismic wavefields. By casting the wavefield extrapolation problem in this framework, wavefields can successfully be extrapolated in the modal domain via a computationally cheaper operation. A proof of principle for the {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}compressed sensing{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} method is given for wavefield extrapolation in 2-D. The results show that our method is stable and produces identical results compared to the direct application of the full extrapolation operator. \copyright2007 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2792882},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/lin07SEGcwe1/lin07SEGcwe1.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/lin07SEGcwe1/lin07SEGcwe1_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tim T.Y. Lin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {saab2007SEGcbp,
	title = {Curvelet-based primary-multiple separation from a Bayesian perspective},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {2510-2514},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {In this abstract, we present a novel primary-multiple separation scheme which makes use of the sparsity of both primaries and multiples in a transform domain, such as the curvelet transform, to provide estimates of each. The proposed algorithm utilizes seismic data as well as the output of a preliminary step that provides (possibly) erroneous predictions of the multiples. The algorithm separates the signal components, i.e., the primaries and multiples, by solving an optimization problem that assumes noisy input data and can be derived from a Bayesian perspective. More precisely, the optimization problem can be arrived at via an assumption of a weighted Laplacian distribution for the primary and multiple coefficients in the transform domain and of white Gaussian noise contaminating both the seismic data and the preliminary prediction of the multiples, which both serve as input to the algorithm. \copyright2007 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2792988},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/saab07SEGcbp/saab07SEGcbp.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/saab07SEGcbp/saab07SEGcbp_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rayan Saab and Deli Wang and Ozgur Yilmaz and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {yarham2006SEGcgrr,
	title = {Curvelet-based ground roll removal},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {25},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {2777-2782},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {We have effectively identified and removed ground roll through a two-step process. The first step is to identify the major components of the ground roll through various methods including multiscale separation, directional or frequency filtering or by any other method that identifies the ground roll. Given this estimate for ground roll, the recorded signal is separated during the second step through a block-coordinate relaxation method that seeks the sparsest set for weighted curvelet coefficients of the ground roll and the sought-after reflectivity. The combination of these two methods allows us to separate out the ground roll signal while preserving the reflector information. Since our method is iterative, we have control of the separation process. We successfully tested our algorithm on a real data set with a complex ground roll and reflector structure.},
	keywords = {SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2370101},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2006/yarham06SEGcgrr/yarham06SEGcgrr.pdf},
	author = {Carson Yarham and Urs Boeniger and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {beyreuther2005SEGcot,
	title = {Computation of time-lapse differences with 3-D directional frames},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {24},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {2488-2491},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {We present an alternative method of extracting production related differences from time-lapse seismic data sets. Our method is not based on the actual subtraction of the two data sets, risking the enhancement of noise and introduction of artifacts due to local phase rotation and slightly misaligned events. Rather, it mutes events of the monitor survey with respect to the baseline survey based on the magnitudes of coefficients in a sparse and local atomic decomposition. Our technique is demonstrated to be an effective tool for enhancing the time-lapse signal from surveys which have been cross-equalized. \copyright2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2148227},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2005/Beyreuther05SEGcot/Beyreuther05SEGcot.pdf},
	author = {Moritz Beyreuther and Jamin Cristall and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2004SEGcbn,
	title = {Curvelet-based non-linear adaptive subtraction with sparseness constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {23},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {1977-1980},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {In this paper an overview is given on the application of directional basis functions, known under the name Curvelets/Contourlets, to various aspects of seismic processing and imaging, which involve adaptive subtraction. Key concepts in the approach are the use of directional basis functions that localize in both domains (e.g. space and angle); non-linear estimation, which corresponds to localized muting on the coefficients, possibly supplemented by constrained optimization. We will discuss applications that include multiple, ground-roll removal and migration denoising. \copyright2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.1851181},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcbn/Herrmann04SEGcbn.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcbn/Herrmann04SEGcbn_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Peyman P. Moghaddam}
}
@conference {herrmann2004SEGcdm,
	title = {Curvelet-domain multiple elimination with sparseness constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {23},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {1333-1336},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Predictive multiple suppression methods consist of two main steps: a prediction step, in which multiples are predicted from the seismic data, and a subtraction step, in which the predicted multiples are matched with the true multiples in the data. The last step appears crucial in practice: an incorrect adaptive subtraction method will cause multiples to be sub-optimally subtracted or primaries being distorted, or both. Therefore, we propose a new domain for separation of primaries and multiples via the Curvelet transform. This transform maps the data into almost orthogonal localized events with a directional and spatial-temporal component. The multiples are suppressed by thresholding the input data at those Curvelet components where the predicted multiples have large amplitudes. In this way the more traditional filtering of predicted multiples to fit the input data is avoided. An initial field data example shows a considerable improvement in multiple suppression. \copyright2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.1851110},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcdm/Herrmann04SEGcdm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcdm/Herrmann04SEGcdm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and D. J. Verschuur}
}
