@presentation {herrmann2016SINBADFwom,
	title = {Welcome \& Overview of the Meeting},
	year = {2016},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2016, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/herrmann2016SINBADFwom/herrmann2016SINBADFwom.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/herrmann2016SINBADFwom/herrmann2016SINBADFwom.mov},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {fang2015SINBADwri,
	title = {Wavefield reconstruction inversion with source estimation and its application to 2014 Chevron synthetic blind test dataset},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present a robust wavefield reconstruction inversion with source estimation. The source wavelet is estimated with the reconstruction of wavefield simultaneously by solving an extended data augmentation problem. We apply this method to the 2014 Chevron synthetic blind test dataset and show the robustness of our method.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/fang2015SINBADwri/fang2015SINBADwri.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {fang2015SINBADFwri,
	title = {Wavefield-reconstruction inversion with source estimation and minimum smoothness constraint {\textendash} application to the Chevron 2014 dataset},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present a robust wavefield reconstruction inversion with source estimation. The source wavelet is estimated with the reconstruction of wavefield simultaneously by solving an extended data-augmented problem. We apply this method to the 2014 Chevron synthetic blind test dataset and show the robustness of our method.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/fang2015SINBADFwri/fang2015SINBADFwri.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/fang2015SINBADFwri/fang2015SINBADFwri.mov},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {herrmann2015SINBADFwom,
	title = {Welcome \& Overview of the Meeting},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/herrmann2015SINBADFwom/herrmann2015SINBADFwom.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/herrmann2015SINBADFwom/herrmann2015SINBADFwom.mov},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {herrmann2014SINBADwri,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) - a new take on wave-equation based inversion},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We discuss a recently proposed novel method for waveform inversion: Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI). As opposed to conventional FWI {\textendash}- which attempts to minimize the error between observed and predicted data obtained by solving a wave equation {\textendash}- WRI reconstructs a wave-field from the data and extracts a model-update from this wavefield by minimizing the wave-equation residual. The method does not require explicit computation of an adjoint wavefield as all the necessary information is contained in the reconstructed wavefield. We show how the corresponding model updates can be interpreted physically analogously to the conventional imaging-condition-based approach.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/herrmann2014SINBADwri/herrmann2014SINBADwri.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {ghadermarzy2014SINBADwrr,
	title = {Wavefield reconstruction via randomized sampling},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Regular sampling along the time axis is a common approach for seismic imaging. However, seismic data are often spatially undersampled due to economical reasons as well as ground surface limitations. Operational conditions might result in noisy traces or even gaps in coverage and irregular sampling which often leads to image artifacts. Seismic trace interpolation aims to interpolate missing traces in an otherwise regularly sampled seismic data to a complete regular grid. In this talk, we explain some techniques, with low computational complexity, that can be used to improve the results. In particular, we talk about weighting, switching to midpoint-offset domain from frequency-space domain, and uniform versus jittered undersampling. We illustrate the advantages of these modifications using a real seismic line from the Gulf of Suez.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/ghadermarzy2014SINBADwrr/ghadermarzy2014SINBADwrr.pdf},
	author = {Navid Ghadermarzy and Ozgur Yilmaz and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {li2014SINBADwmg,
	title = {Why the modified Gauss-Newton method?},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In our earlier work, we develop the modified Gauss-Newton method for FWI, which requires each update of FWI to be sparse in the curvelet domain. Our empirical observation of the MGN method is that it can find us a solution for FWI problem with sparse perturbation of the initial guess without changing the underlying objective. In this talk, we will analyze the MGN method to find out the reason why it can generate a sparse perturbation of the initial model, because sum of spares updates could easily generate non-sparse perturbations. Moreover, we will illustrate when do we expect the modified Gauss-Newton method to yield a solution with sparse perturbation and in what circumstances should we use it in place of other algorithms like standard Gauss-Newton.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/li2014SINBADwmg/li2014SINBADwmg.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {kumar2013SINBADwrs,
	title = {Wavefield reconstruction with SVD-free low-rank matrix factorization},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {As shown in past, we can leverage the ideas from the field of compressed sensing to cast problems like seismic data interpolation or sequential shot data recovery from simultaneous data, as a compressed sensing problem. In this work we will show how we can borrow the same ideas of compressed sensing and cast these problems as matrix completion problems. Instead of sparsity we will show that we can exploit the low-rank structure of seismic data to solve these problems. One of the impediments in rank-minimization problem is the computation of singular values. We will also show how we can solve the rank minimization problems SVD-free. The practical application is divided into three parts: 1. In case of sequential seismic data acquisition, how jittered subsampling helps to recover the better quality data as compared to random subsampling. 2. How the incorporation of reciprocity principles help to enhance the quality of recovered fully sampled data. 3. How we can recover the sequential source data from simultaneous source data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/kumar2013SINBADwrs/kumar2013SINBADwrs.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Hassan Mansour and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {xiang2012SINBADweb,
	title = {Wave-equation based inversion with joint sparsity promotion},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/xiang2012SINBADweb/xiang2012SINBADweb_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li}
}
@presentation {yilmaz2012SINBADwms,
	title = {Weighted methods in sparse recovery},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In the recent years we have successfully employed "weighted" algorithms to recover sparse signals from few linear, non-adaptive measurements. The general principle here is to use prior knowledge about the signal to be recovered, e.g., approximate locations of large-in-magnitude transform coefficients, if such information is available. An example for this is the use of weighted 1-norm minimization to improve wavefield reconstruction from randomized (sub)sampling. We will review these results and outline some new directions we have explored during the last year, such as weighted non-convex sparse recovery (see Ghadermarzy{\textquoteright}s talk), weighted analysis-based recovery (see Hargreaves{\textquoteright}s talk), and a weighted randomized Kaczmarz algorithm for solving large overdetermined systems of equations that are known to admit a (nearly) sparse solution. Various examples in seismic will be shown.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/yilmaz2012SINBADwms/yilmaz2012SINBADwms_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ozgur Yilmaz}
}
@presentation {krislock2012SINBADwsn,
	title = {Wireless sensor network localization},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Locating the position of sensors connected together in a wireless network given only the position of a small number of the sensors and estimates of some of the distances between the sensors is a difficult problem with many modern applications. Within the last few years research in wireless sensor network localization has greatly increased due to the many new applications using wireless sensors, from lightweight sensors used to monitor the environment to ocean-bottom sensors used in geophysical applications. A second reason for this increased interest is our recent ability to efficiently solve these problems using modern semidefinite optimization solvers. We will discuss how semidefinite optimization can be used to solve such problems and possible directions for future work.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/krislock2012SINBADwsn/krislock2012SINBADwsn_pres.pdf},
	author = {Nathan Krislock}
}
@presentation {vanleeuwen2011SINBADoofwi,
	title = {Wavefield modelling and inversion in Matlab},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2011, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2011/Fall/vanleeuwen2011SINBADoofwi/vanleeuwen2011SINBADoofwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@presentation {herrmann2011SINBADoverview,
	title = {Welcome and overview of SINBAD \& DNOISE},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2011, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2011/Fall/herrmann2011SINBADoverview/herrmann2011SINBADoverview_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {mansour2011SINBADwcw,
	title = {Why do curvelets work?},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2011, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2011/Fall/mansour2011SINBADwcw/mansour2011SINBADwcw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Hassan Mansour}
}
@presentation {vanleeuwen2010SINBADwis,
	title = {Waveform inversion by stochastic optimization},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2010, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2010/Fall/vanleeuwen2010SINBADwis/vanleeuwen2010SINBADwis_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {yan2008SINBADwru,
	title = {Wavefield reconstruction using simultaneous denoising interpolation vs. denoising after interpolation},
	booktitle = {SINBAD 2008},
	year = {2008},
	abstract = {This report represents and compares two methods of wavefield reconstruction from noisy seismic data with missing traces. The two methods are (i) First interpolate incomplete noisy data to get complete noisy data and then denoise, and (ii) Interpolate and denoise the incomplete noisy data simultaneously. A sample test of synthetic data will be presented. The results of tests show that denoising after interpolation is better than simultaneous denoising and interpolation if the parameter of the denoising problem is chosen appropriately.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2008/yan2008SINBADwru/yan2008SINBADwru.pdf},
	author = {Jiupeng Yan}
}
