@presentation {fang2016SINBADFeaq,
	title = {Efficient approach for quantifying uncertainty of wavefield reconstruction inversion},
	year = {2016},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Due to the noisy measurements, sparse observations, uncertain forward models, and uncertain prior parameter information, significant uncertainty arises in the inverted velocity model of full-waveform inversion. The uncertain velocity model leads to the uncertainty in the correct positions of events in the migrated images, which subsequently influences the important decision-makings in the oil and gas exploration and production (E\&P) business such as the drilling decisions and economic evaluations. Therefore, understanding the uncertainty in the inverted velocity model is essential for the mitigation of the E\&P risks. A common approach to accounting for uncertainty in seismic inverse problems like full-waveform inversion is to describe the unknown parameters in probabilistic by the Bayesian inference. The Bayesian inference aims at incorporating the information from the data, physics, and one{\textquoteright}s prior knowledge to formulate a posterior distribution function to characterize the statistical properties of the unknown parameters. However, characterizing uncertainties for the large-scale full-waveform inversion in seismic exploration is prohibitively expensive since it requires thousands of function evaluations to sample the parameter space (e.g. via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling). Apart from this, the existing methods of uncertainty quantification for full-waveform inversion is through applying the Bayesian inference to the standard method such as the adjoint-state method with the assumption that no uncertainty arises from the wave-equation. However, the wave-equation may not be able to reflect all the physics, hence, incorporating uncertainty from wave-equation might benefit the quantification of uncertainty. In this work, we propose to perform uncertainty quantification using the recently proposed wavefield reconstruction inversion technique, which gives an appropriate framework to tackle the uncertainty in wave-equation solve by adding the misfit of the wave-equation to the likelihood distribution and relaxing the wave-equation constraint. Moreover, we propose a computationally feasible approach to analyzing the posterior distribution of the wavefield reconstruction inversion method, which incorporates a Gaussian distribution that approximates the posterior distribution with an optimization-driven Gaussian simulator to sample the Gaussian distribution efficiently. Numerical examples show that comparing to the McMC method, our approach is able to produce comparable results with less computational cost. This is joint work with Curt da Silva and Rachel Kuske.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2016, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/fang2016SINBADFeaq/fang2016SINBADFeaq.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/fang2016SINBADFeaq/fang2016SINBADFeaq.mov},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Chia Ying Lee and Curt Da Silva and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann and Rachel Kuske}
}
@presentation {kumar2016SINBADFels,
	title = {Efficient large-scale 5D seismic data acquisition and processing using rank-minimization},
	year = {2016},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Seismic data collection is becoming challenging because of increased demands for high-quality, long-offset and wide-azimuth data. Leveraging ideas from CS, in this work we establish a cost effective acquisition and processing techniques, which are no longer dominated by survey area size but by the sparsity of seismic data volumes. In the first part of abstract, we establish connections between random time dithering and jittered sampling in space. Specifically, we recover high-quality 5D seismic data volumes from time-jittered marine acquisition where the average inter-shot time is significantly reduced, leading to cheaper surveys due to fewer overlapping shots. The time-jittered acquisition, in conjunction with the shot separation by Singular-Value Decomposition (SVD)-free factorization based rank-minimization approach, allows us to recover high quality 5D seismic data volumes. Results are illustrated for simulations of simultaneous time-jittered continuous recording for a 3D ocean-bottom cable survey, where we outperforms existing techniques, by an order of magnitude computational speedup and using 1/20th of the memory, that use sparsity in transforms domains. The second part of abstract focussed on leveraging low-rank structure in seismic data to solve extremely large data recovery (interpolation) problems. We introduced a large{\textendash}scale SVD-free optimization framework that is robust with respect to outliers and that uses information on the support. We test the efficacy of the proposed interpolation framework on a large-scale 5D seismic data, generated from the geologically complex synthetic 3D Compass velocity model, where 80\% of the data has been removed. Our findings show that major computational and memory gains are possible compared to curvelet-based reconstruction.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2016, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/kumar2016SINBADFels/kumar2016SINBADFels.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/kumar2016SINBADFels/kumar2016SINBADFels.mov},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {louboutin2015SINBADFess,
	title = {Extending the search space of time-domain adjoint-state FWI w/ randomized implicit time shifts},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We introduce a modified adjoint-state method for time domain FWI that allows us to extend the research space. As a result, we arrive at a formulation where the sensitivity to cycle skipping is reduced. Our method obtains results with the same computational costs as FWI (The PDE solved is the same) but with significantly reduced memory costs. We use new results in non-convex optimization to justify the method as well as new regularization techniques and stochastic optimization to improve the behavior of the algorithm.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/louboutin2015SINBADFess/louboutin2015SINBADFess.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/louboutin2015SINBADFess/louboutin2015SINBADFess.mov},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {zheglova2014SINBADead,
	title = {Exploring applications of depth stepping in seismic inverse problems},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We are exploring applications of stable depth extrapolation with the full wave equation to imaging and inversion. Depth stepping with full wave equation can be advantageous to the time and frequency domain modelling if special care is taken to stabilize the depth exptrapolator efficiently, since it reduces the higher dimensional modelling problem to a number of lower dimensional subproblems. We are interested in exploring applications in inversion, modelling and imaging. For example, just as the reverse time migration can be shown to be the gradient of the reduced formulation of the full waveform inversion problem, it is interesting to explore whether a formulation of the inversion problem can be achieved whose gradient can be computed using depth stepping techniques. We are also interested in such applications as preconditioning of iterative methods for Helmholtz equation and imaging.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Spring/zheglova2014SINBADead/zheglova2014SINBADead.pdf},
	author = {Polina Zheglova and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {kumar2014SINBADeia,
	title = {Extended images in action {\textendash}- image gather with surface-related multiples},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Common image gathers are used in building velocity models, invert anisotropy parameters and to analyze reservoir attributes. Often primary reflections are used to form the image gathers and multiples are typically attenuated in processing. However, researchers have shown that, if correctly used, they can provide useful information about the subsurface during reverse-time migration. In this work, i will show how we can use multiples along with primaries to form the image-gathers.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/kumar2014SINBADeia/kumar2014SINBADeia.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Ning Tu and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt,
	title = {Estimating 4D differences in time-lapse using randomized sampling techniques},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Repeatability in the seismic survey and processing has been cited as the main reason for which 4D seismic technology work. In the last decade, concerted efforts have been spent to make the 4D seismic process highly repeatable, without significant success. On the contrary, Compressed Sensing, which is also a relatively new sampling paradigm proposes that one can recover an estimate of a fully sampled signal from a noisy, under-sampled measurements provided the acquisition architecture satisfies some properties. By observing different under-sampled and random measurements from each vintage, corresponding to different acquisition geometries, we show that one can still detect the 4D change in time using recent ideas from Compressed sensing. Using a realistic synthetic model, we show two methods of estimating the 4D difference and compare their relative performance to each other.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt/oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {peters2013SINBADepm,
	title = {Examples from the penalty-method},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {A novel penalty method for PDE-constrained optimization was recently proposed by van Leeuwen and Herrmann (2013). The conventional PDE-constrained optimization formulation used in seismic waveform inversion is based on calculating the gradient of the data misfit objective functional via the adjoint-state method, at the cost of two PDE solves. The penalty method requires only one solution of an overdetermined linear system, in the least-squares sense. In this talk some numerical properties of this linear system will be exposed. The penalty method for PDE-constrained optimization involves a parameter, balancing the data misfit and PDE-misfit parts of the objective functional. This talk will address how to select this very important parameter. Some examples will be shown in which the penalty method outperforms the conventional method in non-linear waveform inversion, as well as linearized seismic imaging by migration.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/peters2013SINBADepm/peters2013SINBADepm.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {herrmann2013SINBADeia,
	title = {Extended images in action},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Image gathers as a function of subsurface offset are an important tool for migration-velocity and amplitude-versus-angle analysis in areas of complex geology. Traditionally, these gathers are thought of as multidimensional correlations of the source and receiver wavefields. The bottleneck in computing the gathers lies in the fact that one needs to store and compute these wavefields and in correlating the wavefields to obtain the desired image gathers. Therefore, the image gathers are typically only computed for a limited number of subsurface points and for a limited range of subsurface offsets. In this presentation, we offer a new perspective on such gathers by organizing the extended image as a function of all subsurface offsets for all subsurface points in a matrix whose (i,j) entry captures the interaction between gridpoints i and j. Of course, it is infeasible to form and store this matrix. Instead, we propose an efficient algorithm to glean information from the image volume via the action of matrix-vector products with this matrix. We illustrate how this can be used to (i) form conventional image gathers and construct objective functions for automated MVA and (ii) calculate true two-way wave-equation angle gathers that allow us to carry out linearized angle-versus-offset inversion with geologic-dip correction. This is joint work with Tristan van Leeuwen and Rajiv Kumar.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Spring/herrmann2013SINBADeia/herrmann2013SINBADeia.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {kumar2013SINBADava,
	title = {Extended images in action: efficient AVA via probing},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Common image gathers (CIG) are an important tool to perform AVA analysis in areas of complex geology. Unfortunately, it is prohibitively very expensive to compute these CIG for all the subsurface points. In this work, we present an efficient way to compute CIG for all subsurface offsets without explicitly calculating the source and receiver wavefields for all the sources. Because the CIG contain all possible subsurface offsets, we compute the angle-domain image gathers by selecting the subsurface offset that is aligned with the local geologic dip. We propose a method to compute the local dip information directly from common-image-point gathers. To assess the quality of the angle-domain common-image-points gathers we compute the angle-dependent reflectivity coefficients and compare them with theoretical reflectivity coefficients yielded by the (linearized) Zoeppritz equations for a few synthetic models.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/kumar2013SINBADava/kumar2013SINBADava.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {kumar2013SINBADeia,
	title = {Extended images in action: efficient WEMVA via randomized probing},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Extended images as a function of the full subsurface offset are an important tool to perform wave-equation based migration velocity analysis (WEMVA) in areas of complex geology. Unfortunately, computation \& storage of these extended images is prohibitively expensive. In this work, we present an efficient way to compute extended images for all subsurface offsets without explicitly calculating the source and receiver wavefields for all the sources. Instead, we calculate actions of extended image volumes on probing vectors that live in the image space. The probing can either be defined as vectors from the Dirac basis, which allows us to form the extended image at the location of the point diffractor, or they can be defined in terms of Gaussian noise. The latter corresponds to sources with random weights firing simultaneously at every grid point. We demonstrate that this probing leads to a computationally efficient implementation of WEMVA. This is joint work with Tristan van Leeuwen.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/kumar2013SINBADeia/kumar2013SINBADeia.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {aravkin2012SINBADenp,
	title = {Estimating nuisance parameters in inverse problems},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Many inverse problems include nuisance parameters which, while not of direct interest, are required to recover primary parameters. In this talk, we present the idea of "projecting out" these variables, and how this idea allows us to design methods for solving a broad class of problems with nuisance parameters, such as variance or degrees of freedom. We then discuss several geophysical applications, including including estimation of unknown variance parameters in the Gaussian model for full waveform inversion, degree of freedom (d.o.f.) parameter estimation in the context of robust imaging problems, and robust source estimation.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/aravkin2012SINBADenp/aravkin2012SINBADenp_pres.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin}
}
@presentation {li2011SINBADels,
	title = {Efficient least-squares imaging with sparsity promotion and compressive sensing},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2011, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2011/Fall/li2011SINBADels/li2011SINBADels_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li}
}
@presentation {aravkin2011SINBADesp,
	title = {Extensions to sparsity promotion},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2011, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2011/Fall/aravkin2011SINBADesp/aravkin2011SINBADesp_pres.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin}
}
@presentation {almatar2010SINBADesf,
	title = {Estimation of surface-free data by curvelet-domain matched filtering and sparse inversion},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2010, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2010/Fall/almatar2010SINBADesf/almatar2010SINBADesf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Mufeed H. AlMatar}
}
@presentation {aravkin2010SINBADesf,
	title = {Exploiting sparsity in full-waveform inversion: nonlinear basis pursuit denoise algorithm},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2010, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2010/Fall/aravkin2010SINBADesf/aravkin2010SINBADesf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin}
}
