@conference {oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl,
	title = {Improved time-lapse data repeatability with randomized sampling and distributed compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(EAGE, Paris)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Recently, new ideas on randomized sampling for time-lapse seismic acquisition have been proposed to address some of the challenges of replicating time-lapse surveys. These ideas, which stem from distributed compressed sensing (DCS) led to the birth of a joint recovery model (JRM) for processing time-lapse data (noise-free) acquired from non-replicated acquisition geometries. However, when the earth does not change{\textendash}-i.e. no time-lapse{\textemdash}the recovered vintages from two non-replicated surveys should show high repeatability measured in terms of normalized RMS, which is a standard metric for quantifying time-lapse data repeatability. Under this assumption of no time-lapse change, we demonstrate improved repeatability (with JRM) of the recovered data from non-replicated random samplings, first with noisy data and secondly in situations where there are calibration errors i.e. where the acquisition parameters such as source/receiver coordinates are not precise.},
	keywords = {calibration, Compressive Sensing, EAGE, noise, repeatability, time lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201701389},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2017/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2017/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl_poster.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI,
	title = {In which domain should we measure the misfit for robust full waveform inversion?},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on minimizing the difference between observed and modeled data, as measured by some penalty function. A popular choice, of course, is the least-squares penalty. However, when outliers are present in the data, the use of robust penalties such as the Huber or Student{\textquoteright}s t may significantly improve the results since they put relatively less weight on large residuals. In order for robust penalties to be effective, the outliers must be somehow localized and distinguishable from the good data. We propose to first transform the residual into a domain where the outliers are localized before measuring the misfit with a robust penalty. This is exactly how one would normally devise filters to remove the noise before applying conventional FWI. We propose to merge the two steps and let the inversion process implicitly filter out the noise. Results on a synthetic dataset show the effectiveness of the approach.},
	keywords = {EAGE, full waveform inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130839},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Henri Calandra and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {hennenfent2007EAGEisf,
	title = {Irregular sampling: from aliasing to noise},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2007},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Seismic data is often irregularly and/or sparsely sampled along spatial coordinates. We show that these acquisition geometries are not necessarily a source of adversity in order to accurately reconstruct adequately-sampled data. We use two examples to illustrate that it may actually be better than equivalent regularly subsampled data. This comment was already made in earlier works by other authors. We explain this behavior by two key observations. Firstly, a noise-free underdetermined problem can be seen as a noisy well-determined problem. Secondly, regularly subsampling creates strong coherent acquisition noise (aliasing) difficult to remove unlike the noise created by irregularly subsampling that is typically weaker and Gaussian-like.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Presentation, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2007/hennenfent07EAGEisf/hennenfent07EAGEisf.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2007/hennenfent07EAGEisf/hennenfent07EAGEisf_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2007/hennenfent07EAGEisf/hennenfent07EAGEisf_WS.pdf},
	author = {Gilles Hennenfent and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
