@conference {herrmann2022EAGEcvm,
	title = {Capturing velocity-model uncertainty and two-phase flow with Fourier Neural Operators},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2022},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	pages = {AI in Geoscience and Geophysics: Current Trends and Future Prospects (Dedicated Session)},
	keywords = {CCS, EAGE, Fourier neural operators, JRM, seismic imaging, Uncertainty quantification},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2022/herrmann2022EAGEcvm/index.html},
	author = {Ali Siahkoohi and Thomas J. Grady II and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kumar2018EAGEcsb,
	title = {Compressed sensing based land simultaneous acquisition using encoded sweeps},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(EAGE, Copenhagen)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Simultaneous shooting methods using encoded sweeps can enhance the productivity of land acquisition in situations where deployment of many vibrators and larger receiver spread is not possible in the field due to obstructions or permit limitations. However, the existing framework requires shooting the full sequence of encoded sweeps on each shot point to reconstruct the complete frequency bandwidth Green{\textquoteright}s function. Although this simultaneous shooting method reduces the sweeping time vs conventional sequential shooting, the gain in efficiency is limited. To further reduce the sweeping time, we propose to acquire randomly selected subsets of the encoded sweeps sequences followed by a rank-minimization based joint source separation and spectral interpolation framework to reconstruct the full bandwidth deblended Green{\textquoteright}s function. We demonstrate the advantages of proposed sampling and reconstruction framework using a synthetic seismic line simulated using SEG-SEAM Phase II land velocity and density model.},
	keywords = {compressed sensing, EAGE, land, SEAM, source separation, spectral interpolation},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201800643},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2018/kumar2018EAGEcsb/kumar2018EAGEcsb.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2018/kumar2018EAGEcsb/kumar2018EAGEcsb_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Shashin Sharan and Nick Moldoveanu and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2015EAGEcsm,
	title = {Compressed sensing in 4-D marine{\textendash}-recovery of dense time-lapse data from subsampled data without repetition},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered marine acquisition for time-lapse surveys by working on more realistic field acquisition scenarios by incorporating irregular spatial grids without insisting on repeatability between the surveys. Since we are always subsampled in both the baseline and monitor surveys, we are interested in recovering the densely sampled baseline and monitor, and then the (complete) 4-D difference from subsampled/incomplete baseline and monitor data.},
	keywords = {EAGE, NFFT, off-the-grid, simultaneous acquisition, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413088},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/wason2015EAGEcsm/wason2015EAGEcsm.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/wason2015EAGEcsm/wason2015EAGEcsm_poster.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {smithyman2015EAGEcwi,
	title = {Constrained waveform inversion of colocated VSP and surface seismic data},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Constrained Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI) is applied to produce a high-resolution velocity model from both Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP) and surface seismic data. The case study comes from the Permian Basin in Texas, USA. This dataset motivates and tests several new developments in methodology that enable recovery of model results that sit within multiple a priori constraint sets. These constraints are imposed through a Projected Quasi-Newton (PQN) approach, wherein the projection set is the intersection of physical property bounds and anisotropic wavenumber filtering. This enables the method to recover geologically-reasonable models while preserving the fast model convergence offered by a quasi-Newton optimization scheme like l-BFGS. In the Permian Basin example, low-frequency data from both arrays are inverted together and regularized by this projection approach. Careful choice of the constraint sets is possible without requiring tradeoff parameters as in a quadratic penalty approach to regularization. Multiple 2D FWI results are combined to produce an interpolated 3D model that is consistent with the models from migration velocity analysis and VSP processing, while offering improved resolution and illumination of features from both datasets.},
	keywords = {EAGE, VSP, waveform inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201412906},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/smithyman2015EAGEcwi/smithyman2015EAGEcwi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/smithyman2015EAGEcwi/smithyman2015EAGEcwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Brendan R. Smithyman and Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {lin2013EAGEcsd,
	title = {Cosparse seismic data interpolation},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Many modern seismic data interpolation and redatuming algorithms rely on the promotion of transform-domain sparsity for high-quality results. Amongst the large diversity of methods and different ways of realizing sparse reconstruction lies a central question that often goes unaddressed: is it better for the transform-domain sparsity to be achieved through explicit construction of sparse representations (e.g., by thresholding of small transform-domain coefficients), or by demanding that the algorithm return physical signals which produces sparse coefficients when hit with the forward transform? Recent results show that the two approaches give rise to different solutions when the transform is redundant, and that the latter approach imposes a whole new class of constraints related to where the forward transform produces zero coefficients. From this framework, a new reconstruction algorithm is proposed which may allow better reconstruction from subsampled signaled than what the sparsity assumption alone would predict. In this work we apply the new framework and algorithm to the case of seismic data interpolation under the curvelet domain, and show that it admits better reconstruction than some existing L1 sparsity-based methods derived from compressive sensing for a range of subsampling factors.},
	keywords = {algorithm, cosparsity, curvelet, EAGE, interpolation, Optimization},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130387},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/lin2013EAGEcsd/lin2013EAGEcsd.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/lin2013EAGEcsd/lin2013EAGEcsd_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tim T.Y. Lin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2012EAGEcsm,
	title = {Compressive sensing in marine acquisition and beyond},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Simultaneous-source marine acquisition is an example of compressive sensing where acquisition with a single vessel is replaced by simultaneous acquisition by multiple vessels with sources that fire at randomly dithered times. By identifying simultaneous acquisition as compressive sensing, we are able to design acquisitions that favour recovery by sparsity promotion. Compared to conventional processing that yields estimates for sequential data, sparse recovery leads to significantly improved results for simultaneous data volumes that are collected in shorter times. These improvements are the result of proper design of the acquisition, selection of the appropriate transform domain, and solution of the recovery problem by sparsity promotion. During this talk, we will show how these design principles can be applied to marine acquisition and to other problems in exploration seismology that can benefit from compressive sensing.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, EAGE, marine, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/herrmann2012EAGEcsm/herrmann2012EAGEcsm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/herrmann2012EAGEcsm/herrmann2012EAGEcsm_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=59854},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Haneet Wason}
}
@conference {frijlink2010EAGEcos,
	title = {Comparison of standard adaptive subtraction and primary-multiple separation in the curvelet domain},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2010},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In recent years, data-driven multiple prediction methods and wavefield extrapolation methods have proven to be powerful methods to attenuate multiples from data acquired in complex 3-D geologic environments. These methods make use of a two-stage approach, where first the multiples (surface-related and / or internal) multiples are predicted before they are subtracted from the original input data in an adaptively. The quality of these predicted multiples often raises high expectations for the adaptive subtraction techniques, but for various reasons these expectations are not always met in practice. Standard adaptive subtraction methods use the well-known minimum energy criterion, stating that the total energy after optimal multiple attenuation should be minimal. When primaries and multiples interfere, the minimum energy criterion is no longer appropriate. Also, when multiples of different orders interfere, adaptive energy minimization will lead to a compromise between different amplitudes corrections for the different orders of multiples. This paper investigates the performance of two multiple subtraction schemes for a real data set that exhibits both interference problems. Results from an adaptive subtraction in the real curvelet domain, separating primaries and multiples, are compared to those obtained using a more conventional adaptive subtraction method in the spatial domain.},
	keywords = {EAGE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2010/frijlink10EAGEcos/frijlink10EAGEcos.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=39875},
	author = {M. O. Frijlink and Reza Shahidi and Felix J. Herrmann and R. G. van Borselen}
}
@conference {herrmann2009EAGEcsa,
	title = {Compressive sensing applied to full-waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2009},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {With the recent resurgence of full-waveform inversion, the computational cost of solving forward modeling problems has become{\textendash}-aside from issues with non-uniqueness{\textendash}-one of the major impediments withstanding successful application of this technology to industry-size data volumes. To overcome this impediment, we argue that further improvements in this area will depend on a problem formulation with a computational complexity that is no longer strictly determined by the size of the discretization but by transform-domain sparsity of its solution. In this new paradigm, we bring computational costs in par with our ability to compress seismic data and images. This premise is related to two recent developments. First, there is the new field of compressive sensing (CS in short throughout the paper, Cand{\textquoteleft}es et al., 2006; Donoho, 2006){\textendash}-where the argument is made, and rigorously proven, that compressible signals can be recovered from severely sub-Nyquist sampling by solving a sparsity promoting program. Second, there is in the seismic community the recent resurgence of simultaneous-source acquisition (Beasley, 2008; Krohn and Neelamani, 2008; Herrmann et al., 2009; Berkhout, 2008; Neelamani et al., 2008), and continuing efforts to reduce the cost of seismic modeling, imaging, and inversion through phase encoding of simultaneous sources (Morton and Ober, 1998; Romero et al., 2000; Krohn and Neelamani, 2008; Herrmann et al., 2009), removal of subsets of angular frequencies (Sirgue and Pratt, 2004; Mulder and Plessix, 2004; Lin et al., 2008) or plane waves (Vigh and Starr, 2008). By using CS principles, we remove sub-sampling interferences asocciated with these approaches through a combination of exploiting transform-domain sparsity, properties of certain sub-sampling schemes, and the existence of sparsity promoting solvers.},
	keywords = {EAGE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2009/Herrmann09EAGEcsa/Herrmann09EAGEcsa.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2009/Herrmann09EAGEcsa/Herrmann09EAGEcsa_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=23961},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Yogi A. Erlangga and Tim T.Y. Lin}
}
@conference {yarham2007EAGEcai,
	title = {Curvelet applications in surface wave removal},
	booktitle = {EAGE Workshop on Curvelets, contourlets, seislets, {\textellipsis} in seismic data processing - where are we and where are we going?},
	year = {2007},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Ground roll removal of seismic signals can be a challenging prospect. Dealing with undersampleing causing aliased waves amplitudes orders of magnitude higher than reflector signals and low frequency loss of information due to band ...},
	keywords = {EAGE, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2007/yarham07EAGEcai/yarham07EAGEcai.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=7590},
	author = {Carson Yarham and Gilles Hennenfent and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {hennenfent2007EAGEcrw,
	title = {Curvelet reconstruction with sparsity-promoting inversion: successes and challenges},
	booktitle = {EAGE Workshop on Curvelets, contourlets, seislets, {\textellipsis} in seismic data processing - where are we and where are we going?},
	year = {2007},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In this overview of the recent Curvelet Reconstruction with Sparsity-promoting Inversion (CRSI) method, we present our latest 2-D and 3-D interpolation results on both synthetic and real datasets. We compare these results to interpolated data using other existing methods. Finally, we discuss the challenges related to sparsity-promoting solvers for the large-scale problems the industry faces.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Presentation, SLIM, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2007/hennenfent07EAGEcrw/hennenfent07EAGEcrw.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2007/hennenfent07EAGEcrw/hennenfent07EAGEcrw_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=7553},
	author = {Gilles Hennenfent and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {beyreuther2004EAGEcdo,
	title = {Curvelet denoising of 4-D seismic},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2004},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {With burgeoning world demand and a limited rate of discovery of new reserves, there is increasing impetus upon the industry to optimize recovery from already existing fields. 4D, or time-lapse, seismic imaging is an emerging technology that holds great promise to better monitor and optimise reservoir production. The basic idea behind 4D seismic is that when multiple 3D surveys are acquired at separate calendar times over a producing field, the reservoir geology will not change from survey to survey but the state of the reservoir fluids will change. Thus, taking the difference between two 3D surveys should remove the static geologic contribution to the data and isolate the time- varying fluid flow component. However, a major challenge in 4D seismic is that acquisition and processing differences between 3D surveys often overshadow the changes caused by fluid flow. This problem is compounded when 4D effects are sought to be derived from vintage 3D data sets that were not originally acquired with 4D in mind. The goal of this study is to remove the acquisition and imaging artefacts from a 4D seismic difference cube using Curveket processing techniques.},
	keywords = {EAGE, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2004/Beyreuther04EAGEcdo/beyreuther2004EAGEcdo_paper.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2004/Beyreuther04EAGEcdo/Beyreuther04EAGEcdo_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/453/EAGE4D2004.pdf?sequence=1},
	author = {Moritz Beyreuther and Felix J. Herrmann and Jamin Cristall}
}
@conference {herrmann2004EAGEcdl,
	title = {Curvelet-domain least-squares migration with sparseness constraints},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2004},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {A non-linear edge-preserving solution to the least-squares migration problem with sparseness constraints is introduced. The applied formalism explores Curvelets as basis functions that, by virtue of their sparseness and locality, not only allow for a reduction of the dimensionality of the imaging problem but which also naturally lead to a non-linear solution with significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio. Additional conditions on the image are imposed by solving a constrained optimization problem on the estimated Curvelet coefficients initialized by thresholding. This optimization is designed to also restore the amplitudes by (approximately) inverting the normal operator, which is like-wise the (de)-migration operators, almost diagonalized by the Curvelet transform.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Presentation, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2004/Herrmann04EAGEcdl/Herrmann04EAGEcdl.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2004/Herrmann04EAGEcdl/Herrmann04EAGEcdl_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=2073},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Peyman P. Moghaddam}
}
