@conference {yin2021SEGcts,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse seismic monitoring of carbon storage and sequestration with the joint recovery model},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(IMAGE, Denver)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {3434-3438},
	abstract = {Time-lapse seismic monitoring of carbon storage and sequestration is often challenging because the time-lapse signature of the growth of CO$_2$ plumes is weak in amplitude and therefore difficult to detect seismically. This situation is compounded by the fact that the surveys are often coarsely sampled and not replicated to reduce costs. As a result, images obtained for different vintages (baseline and monitor surveys) often contain artifacts that may be attributed wrongly to time-lapse changes. To address these issues, we propose to invert the baseline and monitor surveys jointly. By using the joint recovery model, we exploit information shared between multiple time-lapse surveys. Contrary to other time-lapse methods, our approach does not rely on replicating the surveys to detect time-lapse changes. To illustrate this advantage, we present a numerical sensitivity study where CO$_2$ is injected in a realistic synthetic model. This model is representative of the geology in the southeast of the North Sea, an area currently considered for carbon sequestration. Our example demonstrates that the joint recovery model improves the quality of time-lapse images allowing us to monitor the CO$_2$ plume seismically.},
	keywords = {CCS, Compressive Sensing, Imaging, JRM, marine, SEG, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2021-3569087.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/yin2021SEGcts/yin2021SEGcts.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/yin2021SEGcts/Tue-9-28-Yin.html},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2021/yin2021SEGcts/yin2021SEGcts.mp4},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/Software.SEG2021},
	author = {Ziyi Yin and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {kumar2017hrc,
	title = {Highly repeatable 3D compressive full-azimuth towed-streamer time-lapse acquisition {\textendash}- a numerical feasibility study at scale},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {36},
	number = {8},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {08},
	pages = {677-687},
	abstract = {Most conventional 3D time-lapse (or 4D) acquisitions are ocean-bottom cable (OBC) or ocean-bottom node (OBN) surveys since these surveys are relatively easy to replicate compared to towed-streamer surveys. To attain high degrees of repeatability, survey replicability and dense periodic sampling has become the norm for 4D surveys that renders this technology expensive. Conventional towed-streamer acquisitions suffer from limited illumination of subsurface due to narrow azimuth. Although, acquisition techniques such as multi-azimuth, wide-azimuth, rich-azimuth acquisition, etc., have been developed to illuminate the subsurface from all possible angles, these techniques can be prohibitively expensive for densely sampled surveys. This leads to uneven sampling, i.e., dense receiver and coarse source sampling or vice-versa, in order to make these acquisitions more affordable. Motivated by the design principles of Compressive Sensing (CS), we acquire economic, randomly subsampled (or compressive) and simultaneous towed-streamer time-lapse data without the need of replicating the surveys. We recover densely sampled time-lapse data on one and the same periodic grid by using a joint-recovery model (JRM) that exploits shared information among different time-lapse recordings, coupled with a computationally cheap and scalable rank-minimization technique. The acquisition is low cost since we have subsampled measurements (about 70\% subsampled), simulated with a simultaneous long-offset acquisition configuration of two source vessels travelling across a survey area at random azimuths. We analyze the performance of our proposed compressive acquisition and subsequent recovery strategy by conducting a synthetic, at scale, seismic experiment on a 3D time-lapse model containing geological features such as channel systems, dipping and faulted beds, unconformities and a gas cloud. Our findings indicate that the insistence on replicability between surveys and the need for OBC/OBN 4D surveys can, perhaps, be relaxed. Moreover, this is a natural next step beyond the successful CS acquisition examples discussed in this special issue.},
	keywords = {3D, CS, marine, rank minimization, simultaneous long offset, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/tle36080677.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2017/kumar2017hrc/kumar2017hrc.html},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Shashin Sharan and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {oghenekohwo2017hrt,
	title = {Highly repeatable time-lapse seismic with distributed Compressive Sensing{\textendash}-mitigating effects of calibration errors},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {36},
	number = {8},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {08},
	pages = {688-694},
	abstract = {Recently, we demonstrated that combining joint recovery with low-cost non-replicated randomized sampling tailored to time-lapse seismic can give us access to high fidelity, highly repeatable, dense prestack vintages, and high-grade time-lapse. To arrive at this result, we assumed well-calibrated surveys{\textendash}-i.e., we presumed accurate post-plot source/receiver positions. Unfortunately, in practice seismic surveys are prone to calibration errors, which are unknown deviations between actual and post-plot acquisition geometry. By means of synthetic experiments, we analyze the possible impact of these errors on vintages and on time-lapse data obtained with our joint recovery model from compressively sampled surveys. Supported by these experiments, we demonstrate that highly repeatable time-lapse vintages are attainable despite the presence of unknown calibration errors in the positions of the shots. We assess the repeatability quantitatively for two scenarios by studying the impact of calibration errors on conventional dense but irregularly sampled surveys and on low-cost compressed surveys. To separate time-lapse effects from calibration issues, we consider the idealized case where the subsurface remains unchanged and the practical situation where time-lapse changes are restricted to a subset of the data. In both cases, the quality of the recovered vintages and time-lapse decreases gracefully for low-cost compressed surveys with increasing calibration errors. Conversely, the quality of vintages from expensive densely periodically sampled surveys decreases more rapidly as unknown and difficult to control calibration errors increase.},
	keywords = {calibration errors, joint-recovery method, marine, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/tle36080688.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2017/oghenekohwo2017hrt/oghenekohwo2017hrt.html},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl,
	title = {Low-cost time-lapse seismic with distributed compressive sensing{\textendash}-Part 1: exploiting common information among the vintages},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {82},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {P1-P13},
	abstract = {Time-lapse seismic is a powerful technology for monitoring a variety of subsurface changes due to reservoir fluid flow. However, the practice can be technically challenging when one seeks to acquire colocated time-lapse surveys with high degrees of replicability among the shot locations. We have determined that under "ideal" circumstances, in which we ignore errors related to taking measurements off the grid, high-quality prestack data can be obtained from randomized subsampled measurements that are observed from surveys in which we choose not to revisit the same randomly subsampled on-the-grid shot locations. Our acquisition is low cost because our measurements are subsampled. We have found that the recovered finely sampled prestack baseline and monitor data actually improve significantly when the same on-the-grid shot locations are not revisited. We achieve this result by using the fact that different time-lapse data share information and that nonreplicated (on-the-grid) acquisitions can add information when prestack data are recovered jointly. Whenever the time-lapse data exhibit joint structure{\textendash}-i.e., they are compressible in some transform domain and share information{\textendash}-sparsity-promoting recovery of the "common component" and "innovations," with respect to this common component, outperforms independent recovery of the prestack baseline and monitor data. The recovered time-lapse data are of high enough quality to serve as the input to extract poststack attributes used to compute time-lapse differences. Without joint recovery, artifacts{\textendash}-due to the randomized subsampling{\textendash}-lead to deterioration of the degree of repeatability of the time-lapse data. We tested this method by carrying out experiments with reliable statistics from thousands of repeated experiments. We also confirmed that high degrees of repeatability are achievable for an ocean-bottom cable survey acquired with time-jittered continuous recording.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, joint recovery method, marine, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2016-0076.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2017/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl.html},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@mastersthesis {wason2017THsss,
	title = {Simultaneous-source seismic data acquisition and processing with compressive sensing},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(PhD)},
	month = {08},
	school = {The University of British Columbia},
	type = {phd},
	address = {Vancouver},
	abstract = {The work in this thesis adapts ideas from the field of compressive sensing (CS) that lead to new insights into acquiring and processing seismic data, where we can fundamentally rethink how we design seismic acquisition surveys and process acquired data to minimize acquisition- and processing-related costs. Current efforts towards dense source/receiver sampling and full azimuthal coverage to produce high-resolution images of the subsurface have led to the deployment of multiple sources across survey areas. A step ahead from multisource acquisition is simultaneous-source acquisition, where multiple sources fire shots at near-simultaneous/random times resulting in overlapping shot records, in comparison to no overlaps during conventional sequential-source acquisition. Adoption of simultaneous-source techniques has helped to improve survey efficiency and data density. The engine that drives simultaneous-source technology is simultaneous-source separation {\textendash}- a methodology that aims to recover conventional sequential-source data from simultaneous-source data. This is essential because many seismic processing techniques rely on dense and periodic (or regular) source/receiver sampling. We address the challenge of source separation through a combination of tailored simultaneous-source acquisition design and sparsity-promoting recovery via convex optimization using l1 objectives. We use CS metrics to investigate the relationship between marine simultaneous-source acquisition design and data reconstruction fidelity, and consequently assert the importance of randomness in the acquisition system in combination with an appropriate choice for a sparsifying transform (i.e., curvelet transform) in the reconstruction algorithm. We also address the challenge of minimizing the cost of expensive, dense, periodically-sampled and replicated time-lapse surveying and data processing by adapting ideas from distributed compressive sensing. We show that compressive randomized time-lapse surveys need not be replicated to attain acceptable levels of data repeatability, as long as we know the shot positions (post acquisition) to a sufficient degree of accuracy. We conclude by comparing sparsity-promoting and rank-minimization recovery techniques for marine simultaneous-source separation, and demonstrate that recoveries are comparable; however, the latter approach readily scales to large-scale seismic data and is computationally faster.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, Compressive Sensing, marine, Optimization, PhD, simultaneous source, source separation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2017/wason2017THsss/wason2017THsss.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2017/wason2017THsss/wason2017THsss_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason}
}
@conference {kumar2016SEGtjm,
	title = {Time-jittered marine acquisition{\textendash}-a rank-minimization approach for 5D source separation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {119-123},
	abstract = {Simultaneous source marine acquisition has been recognized as an economic way of improving spatial sampling and speedup acquisition time, where a single- (or multiple-) source vessel fires at jittered source locations and time instances. Consequently, the acquired simultaneous data volume is processed to separate the overlapping shot records resulting in densely sampled data volume. It has been shown in the past that the simultaneous source acquisition design and source separation process can be setup as a compressed sensing problem, where conventional seismic data is reconstructed from simultaneous data via a sparsity-promoting optimization formulation. While the recovery quality of separated data is reasonably well, the recovery process can be computationally expensive due to transform-domain redundancy. In this paper, we present a computationally tractable rank-minimization algorithm to separate simultaneous data volumes. The proposed algorithm is suitable for large-scale seismic data, since it avoids singular-value decompositions and uses a low-rank based factorized formulation instead. Results are illustrated for simulations of simultaneous time-jittered continuous recording for a 3D ocean-bottom cable survey.},
	keywords = {5D, marine, SEG, source separation, time-jittered acquisition},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13878249.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/kumar2016SEGtjm/kumar2016SEGtjm.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/kumar2016SEGtjm/kumar2016SEGtjm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {kumar2015sss,
	title = {Source separation for simultaneous towed-streamer marine acquisition {\textendash}- a compressed sensing approach},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {80},
	number = {6},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {11},
	pages = {WD73-WD88},
	abstract = {Simultaneous marine acquisition is an economic way to sample seismic data and speed up acquisition, wherein single or multiple source vessels fire sources at near-simultaneous or slightly random times, resulting in overlapping shot records. The current paradigm for simultaneous towed-streamer marine acquisition incorporates {\textquotedblleft}low variability{\textquotedblright} in source firing times, i.e., 0 <= 1 or 2 s because the sources and receivers are moving. This results in a low degree of randomness in simultaneous data, which is challenging to separate (into its constituent sources) using compressed-sensing-based separation techniques because randomization is key to successful recovery via compressed sensing. We have addressed the challenge of source separation for simultaneous towed-streamer acquisitions via two compressed-sensing-based approaches, i.e., sparsity promotion and rank minimization. We have evaluated the performance of the sparsity-promotion- and rank-minimization-based techniques by simulating two simultaneous towed-streamer acquisition scenarios, i.e., over/under and simultaneous long offset. A field data example from the Gulf of Suez for the over/under acquisition scenario was also developed. We observed that the proposed approaches gave good and comparable recovery qualities of the separated sources, but the rank-minimization technique outperformed the sparsity-promoting technique in terms of the computational time and memory. We also compared these two techniques with the normal-moveout-based median-filtering-type approach, which had comparable results.},
	keywords = {2D, Acquisition, inversion, marine, Optimization, Rank, source separation, sparsity},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2015-0108.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2015/kumar2015sss/kumar2015sss_revised.pdf},
	url2 = {http://library.seg.org/doi/abs/10.1190/geo2015-0108.1},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2014SEGrrt,
	title = {Randomization and repeatability in time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {46-51},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered simultaneous marine acquisition to time-lapse surveys where the requirement for repeatability in acquisition can be waived provided we know the acquisition geometry afterwards. Our method, which does not require repetition, gives 4-D signals comparable to conventional methods where repeatability is key to their success.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, deblending, marine, SEG, time-laspe},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1677.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGrrt/wason2014SEGrrt.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGrrt/wason2014SEGrrt_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2014SEGsss,
	title = {Source separation via SVD-free rank minimization in the hierarchical semi-separable representation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {120-126},
	abstract = {Recent developments in matrix rank optimization have allowed for new computational approaches in the field of source separation or deblending. In this paper, we propose a source separation algorithm for blended marine acquisition, where two sources are deployed at different depths (over/under acquisition). The separation method incorporates the Hierarchical Semi-Separable structure (HSS) inside rank-regularized least-squares formulations. The proposed approach is suitable for large scale problems, since it avoids SVD computations and uses a low-rank factorized formulation instead. We illustrate the performance of the new HSS-based deblending approach by simulating an over/under blended acquisition, wherein uniformly random time delays (of < 1 second) are applied to one of the sources.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, deblending, HSS, marine, Rank, SEG, source separation},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1583.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGsss/wason2014SEGsss.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGsss/wason2014SEGsss_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Rajiv Kumar and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2013EAGEobs,
	title = {Ocean bottom seismic acquisition via jittered sampling},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We present a pragmatic marine acquisition scheme where multiple source vessels sail across an ocean-bottom array firing at airgunsjittered source locations and instances in time. Following the principles of compressive sensing, we can significantly impact the reconstruction quality of conventional seismic data (from jittered data) and demonstrate successful recovery by sparsity promotion. In contrast to random (under)sampling, acquisition via jittered (under)sampling helps in controlling the maximum gap size, which is a practical requirement of wavefield reconstruction with localized sparsifying transforms. Results are illustrated with simulations of time-jittered marine acquisition, which translates to jittered source locations for a given speed of the source vessel, for two source vessels.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, blended, deblending, EAGE, interpolation, marine},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130379},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/wason2013EAGEobs/wason2013EAGEobs.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/wason2013EAGEobs/wason2013EAGEobs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2013SEGtjo,
	title = {Time-jittered ocean bottom seismic acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1-6},
	abstract = {Leveraging ideas from the field of compressed sensing, we show how simultaneous or blended acquisition can be setup as a {\textendash} compressed sensing problem. This helps us to design a pragmatic time-jittered marine acquisition scheme where multiple source vessels sail across an ocean-bottom array firing airguns at {\textendash} jittered source locations and instances in time, resulting in better spatial sampling, and speedup acquisition. Furthermore, we can significantly impact the reconstruction quality of conventional seismic data (from jittered data) and demonstrate successful recovery by sparsity promotion. In contrast to random (under)sampling, acquisition via jittered (under)sampling helps in controlling the maximum gap size, which is a practical requirement of wavefield reconstruction with localized sparsifying transforms. Results are illustrated with simulations of time-jittered marine acquisition, which translates to jittered source locations for a given speed of the source vessel, for two source vessels.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, blending, deblending, interpolation, jittered sampling, marine, OBC, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1391.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/wason2013SEGtjo/wason2013SEGtjo.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/wason2013SEGtjo/wason2013SEGtjo_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2012EAGEcsm,
	title = {Compressive sensing in marine acquisition and beyond},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Simultaneous-source marine acquisition is an example of compressive sensing where acquisition with a single vessel is replaced by simultaneous acquisition by multiple vessels with sources that fire at randomly dithered times. By identifying simultaneous acquisition as compressive sensing, we are able to design acquisitions that favour recovery by sparsity promotion. Compared to conventional processing that yields estimates for sequential data, sparse recovery leads to significantly improved results for simultaneous data volumes that are collected in shorter times. These improvements are the result of proper design of the acquisition, selection of the appropriate transform domain, and solution of the recovery problem by sparsity promotion. During this talk, we will show how these design principles can be applied to marine acquisition and to other problems in exploration seismology that can benefit from compressive sensing.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, EAGE, marine, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/herrmann2012EAGEcsm/herrmann2012EAGEcsm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/herrmann2012EAGEcsm/herrmann2012EAGEcsm_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=59854},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Haneet Wason}
}
@conference {wason2012EAGEode,
	title = {Only dither: efficient simultaneous marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Simultaneous-source acquisition is an emerging technology that is stimulating both geophysical research and commercial efforts. The focus here is on simultaneous-source marine acquisition design and sparsity-promoting sequential-source data recovery. We propose a pragmatic simultaneous-source, randomized marine acquisition scheme where multiple vessels sail across an ocean-bottom array firing airguns at {\textendash}- sequential locations and randomly time-dithered instances. Within the context of compressive sensing, where the choice of the sparsifying transform needs to be incoherent with the compressive sampling matrix, we can significantly impact the reconstruction quality, and demonstrate that the compressive sampling matrix resulting from the proposed sampling scheme is sufficiently incoherent with the curvelet transform to yield successful recovery by sparsity promotion. Results are illustrated with simulations of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}purely" random marine acquisition, which requires an airgun to be located at each source location, and random time-dithering marine acquisition with one and two source vessels. Size of the collected data volumes in all cases is the same. Compared to the recovery from the former acquisition scheme (SNR = 10.5dB), we get good results by dithering with only one source vessel (SNR = 8.06dB) in the latter scheme, which improve at the cost of having an additional source vessel (SNR = 9.44dB).},
	keywords = {Acquisition, EAGE, marine, simultaneous},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/wason2012EAGEode/wason2012EAGEode.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/wason2012EAGEode/wason2012EAGEode_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=58915},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2012CSEGode,
	title = {Only dither: efficient simultaneous marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {02},
	abstract = {Simultaneous-source acquisition is an emerging technology that is stimulating both geophysical research and commercial efforts. Simultaneous marine acquisition calls for the development of a new set of design principles and post-processing tools. The focus here is on simultaneous-source marine acquisition design and sparsity-promoting sequential-source data recovery. We propose a pragmatic simultaneous-source, randomized marine acquisition scheme where multiple vessels sail across an ocean-bottom array firing airguns at {\textendash}- sequential locations and randomly time-dithered instances. By leveraging established findings from the field of compressive sensing, where the choice of the sparsifying transform needs to be incoherent with the compressive sampling matrix, we can significantly impact the reconstruction quality, and demonstrate that the compressive sampling matrix resulting from the proposed sampling scheme is sufficiently incoherent with the curvelet transform to yield successful recovery by sparsity promotion. Results are illustrated with simulations of {\textquotedblleft}purely{\textquotedblright} random marine acquisition, which requires an airgun to be located at each source location, and random time-dithering marine acquisition with one and two source vessels. Size of the collected data volumes in all cases is the same. Compared to the recovery from the former acquisition scheme (SNR = 10.5dB), we get good results by dithering with only one source vessel (SNR = 8.06dB) in the latter scheme, which improve at the cost of having an additional source vessel (SNR = 9.85dB).},
	keywords = {Acquisition, CSEG, marine, simultaneous},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2012/wason2012CSEGode/wason2012CSEGode.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
