@presentation {friedlander2012SINBADrsh,
	title = {Randomized sampling: How confident are you?},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {At last year{\textquoteright}s consortium meeting, I described an inexact gradient method and sampling scheme for data fitting. The randomization method has good convergence properties, at least as measured by the distance to the solution{\textendash}{\textendash}in expectation. But as one insightful critic rightly pointed out, we don{\textquoteright}t usually observe the expectation, at least not in a single run. In this talk I will characterize the convergence of the method in terms of bounds on the probability of being too far away from the solution.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/friedlander2012SINBADrsh/friedlander2012SINBADrsh_pres.pdf},
	author = {Michael P. Friedlander}
}
@article {mansour2012IEEETITrcs,
	title = {Recovering compressively sampled signals using partial support information},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Information Theory},
	volume = {58},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {02},
	pages = {1122-1134},
	publisher = {Department of Computer Science},
	address = {University of British Columbia, Vancouver},
	abstract = {We study recovery conditions of weighted $\ell_1$ minimization for signal reconstruction from compressed sensing measurements when partial support information is available. We show that if at least 50\% of the (partial) support information is accurate, then weighted $\ell_1$ minimization is stable and robust under weaker sufficient conditions than the analogous conditions for standard $\ell_1$ minimization. Moreover, weighted $\ell_1$ minimization provides better upper bounds on the reconstruction error in terms of the measurement noise and the compressibility of the signal to be recovered. We illustrate our results with extensive numerical experiments on synthetic data and real audio and video signals.},
	keywords = {Compressive Sensing},
	doi = {10.1109/TIT.2011.2167214},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/IEEETransInformationTheory/2012/mansour2012IEEETITrcs/mansour2012IEEETITrcs.pdf},
	author = {Michael P. Friedlander and Hassan Mansour and Rayan Saab and Ozgur Yilmaz}
}
@article {Aravkin11TRridr,
	title = {Robust inversion, dimensionality reduction, and randomized sampling},
	journal = {Mathematical Programming},
	volume = {134},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {08},
	pages = {101-125},
	abstract = {We consider a class of inverse problems in which the forward model is the solution operator to linear ODEs or PDEs. This class admits several dimensionality-reduction techniques based on data averaging or sampling, which are especially useful for large-scale problems. We survey these approaches and their connection to stochastic optimization. The data-averaging approach is only viable, however, for a least-squares misfit, which is sensitive to outliers in the data and artifacts unexplained by the forward model. This motivates us to propose a robust formulation based on the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution of the error. We demonstrate how the corresponding penalty function, together with the sampling approach, can obtain good results for a large-scale seismic inverse problem with 50 \% corrupted data.},
	keywords = {FWI, Inverse problems, Optimization, Robust estimation, Seismic inversion, Stochastic optimization},
	doi = {10.1007/s10107-012-0571-6},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/35rwr101h5736340/},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/MathematicalProgramming/aravkin2012MPrid/aravkin2012MPrid.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Michael P. Friedlander and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {aravkin2012ICASSProbustb,
	title = {Robust inversion via semistochastic dimensionality reduction},
	booktitle = {ICASSP},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {5245-5248},
	publisher = {ICASSP},
	organization = {ICASSP},
	abstract = {We consider a class of inverse problems where it is possible to aggregate the results of multiple experiments. This class includes problems where the forward model is the solution operator to linear ODEs or PDEs. The tremendous size of such problems motivates the use dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques based on randomly mixing experiments. These techniques break down, however, when robust data-fitting formulations are used, which are essential in cases of missing data, unusually large errors, and systematic features in the data unexplained by the forward model. We survey robust methods within a statistical framework, and propose a sampling optimization approach that allows DR. The efficacy of the methods are demonstrated for a large-scale seismic inverse problem using the robust Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution, where a useful synthetic velocity model is recovered in the extreme scenario of 60\% corrupted data. The sampling approach achieves this recovery using 20\% of the effort required by a direct robust approach.},
	keywords = {ICASSP},
	doi = {10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6289103},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICASSP/2012/AravkinFriedlanderLeeuwen/AravkinFriedlanderLeeuwen.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Michael P. Friedlander and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@presentation {friedlander2011SINBADrir,
	title = {Robust inversion, data-fitting, and inexact gradient methods},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2011, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2011/Fall/friedlander2011SINBADrir/friedlander2011SINBADrir_pres.pdf},
	author = {Michael P. Friedlander}
}
