@article {silva2018alr,
	title = {Applications of low-rank compressed seismic data to full waveform inversion and extended image volumes},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	year = {2019},
	note = {Accepted on January 22, 2019.},
	abstract = {Conventional oil and gas fields are increasingly difficult to explore and image, resulting in the call for more complex wave-equation based inversion algorithms that require dense long-offset samplings. Consequently, there is an exponential growth in the size of data volumes and prohibitive demands on computational resources. In this work, we propose a method to compress and process seismic data directly in a low-rank tensor format, which drastically reduces the amount of storage required to represent the data. We first outline how seismic data exhibits low-rank structure in a particular transform-domain, which can be exploited to compress the dense data in one extremely storage-efficient tensor format when the data is fully sampled. In the more realistic case of missing data, we can use efficient interpolation techniques to approximate the fully sampled volume in compressed form. In either case, once we have our data represented in its compressed tensor form, we design an algorithm to extract source or receiver gathers directly from the compressed parameters. This extraction process can be done on-the-fly directly on the compressed data, in a full waveform inversion context, and does not require scanning through the entire dataset in order to form shot gathers. To the best of our knowledge, this work is one of the first major contributions to working with seismic data applications directly in the compressed domain without reconstructing the entire data volume. We use a stochastic inversion approach, which works with small subsets of source experiments at each iteration, further reducing the computational and memory costs of full waveform inversion. We also demonstrate how this data compression and extraction technique can be applied to forming full subsurface image gathers through probing techniques.},
	keywords = {common shot/receiver gather, extended image volume, full waveform inversion, low rank, tensor},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2018-0116.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2019/silva2018alr/silva2018alr.pdf},
	author = {Curt Da Silva and Yiming Zhang and Rajiv Kumar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {peters2016cvp,
	title = {Constraints versus penalties for edge-preserving full-waveform inversion},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {36},
	number = {1},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {01},
	pages = {94-100},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion is challenging in complex geologic areas. Even when provided with an accurate starting model, the inversion algorithms often struggle to update the velocity model. Compared with other areas in applied geophysics, including prior information in full-waveform inversion is still in its relative infancy. In part, this is due to the fact that it is difficult to incorporate prior information that relates to geologic settings where strong discontinuities in the velocity model dominate, because these settings call for nonsmooth regularizations. We tackle this problem by including constraints on the spatial variations and value ranges of the inverted velocities, as opposed to adding penalties to the objective, which is more customary in mainstream geophysical inversion. By demonstrating the lack of predictability of edge-preserving inversion when the regularization is in the form of an added penalty term, we advocate the inclusion of constraints instead. Our examples show that the latter leads to more predictable results and to significant improvements in the delineation of salt bodies when these constraints are relaxed gradually in combination with extending the search space to approximately fit the observed data but not the noise.},
	keywords = {algorithm, full waveform inversion, noise, Optimization, penalty methods, salt dome, total variation},
	doi = {10.1190/tle36010094.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2016/peters2016cvp/peters2016cvp.html},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {witte2015TRoam,
	title = {Overview on anisotropic modeling and inversion},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2015-6},
	year = {2015},
	month = {08},
	institution = {UBC},
	abstract = {This note provides an overview on strategies for modeling and inversion with the anisotropic wave equation. Since linear and non-linear inversion methods like least squares RTM and Full Waveform Inversion depend on matching observed field data with synthetically modelled data, accounting for anisotropy effects is necessary in order to accurately match waveforms at long offsets and propagation times. In this note, the two main strategies for anisotropic modelling by solving either a pseudo acoustic wave equation or a pure quasi-P-wave equation are discussed and an inversion workflow using the pure quasi-P-wave equation is provided. In particular, we derive the exact adjoint of the anisotropic forward modelling and jacobian operator and give a detailled describtion of their implementation. The anistropic FWI workflow is tested on a sythetic data example.},
	keywords = {anisotropy, full waveform inversion, Modeling},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2015/witte2015TRoam/witte2015TRoam.html},
	author = {Philipp A. Witte and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {esser2014SEGsgp,
	title = {A scaled gradient projection method for total variation regularized full waveform inversion},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2014-2},
	year = {2014},
	month = {04},
	institution = {UBC},
	abstract = {We propose an extended full waveform inversion formulation that includes convex constraints on the model. In particular, we show how to simultaneously constrain the total variation of the slowness squared while enforcing bound constraints to keep it within a physically realistic range. Synthetic experiments show that including total variation regularization can improve the recovery of a high velocity perturbation to a smooth background model.},
	keywords = {convex constraints, full waveform inversion, total variation regularization},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2014/esser2014SEGsgp/esser2014SEGsgp.html},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI,
	title = {In which domain should we measure the misfit for robust full waveform inversion?},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on minimizing the difference between observed and modeled data, as measured by some penalty function. A popular choice, of course, is the least-squares penalty. However, when outliers are present in the data, the use of robust penalties such as the Huber or Student{\textquoteright}s t may significantly improve the results since they put relatively less weight on large residuals. In order for robust penalties to be effective, the outliers must be somehow localized and distinguishable from the good data. We propose to first transform the residual into a domain where the outliers are localized before measuring the misfit with a robust penalty. This is exactly how one would normally devise filters to remove the noise before applying conventional FWI. We propose to merge the two steps and let the inversion process implicitly filter out the noise. Results on a synthetic dataset show the effectiveness of the approach.},
	keywords = {EAGE, full waveform inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130839},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Henri Calandra and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
