@presentation {rizzuti2021ML4SEISMICdfw,
	title = {A dual formulation of wavefield reconstruction inversion for large-scale seismic inversion},
	year = {2021},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Many of the seismic inversion techniques currently proposed that focus on robustness with respect to the background model choice are not apt to large-scale 3D applications, and the methods that are computationally feasible for industrial problems, such as full waveform inversion, are notoriously limited by convergence stagnation and require adequate starting models. We propose a novel solution that is both scalable and less sensitive to starting models or inaccurate parameters (such as anisotropy) that are typically kept fixed during inversion. It is based on a dual reformulation of the classical wavefield reconstruction inversion, whose empirical robustness with respect to these issues is well documented in the literature. While the classical version is not suited to 3D, as it leverages expensive frequency-domain solvers for the wave equation, our proposal allows the deployment of state-of-the-art time-domain finite-difference methods, and is potentially mature for industrial-scale problems.},
	keywords = {FWI, ML4SEISMIC, SLIM, wave-equation, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2021/rizzuti2021ML4SEISMICdfw/Tue-10-55-Rizzuti.pdf},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {rizzuti2021SIAMGSwrid,
	title = {Time-domain Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion for large-scale seismic inversion},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(SIAM GS, virtual)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Data fitting based on a wave equation model has driven the modern development in seismic imaging, and it is now relevant for large scale inversion. A wider adoption is currently being limited by available computational resources and the classical limitations of non-linear optimization, which often produces suboptimal local minima. A class of methods based on the inexact solution of the wave equation, known as wavefield reconstruction inversion, have shown remarkable robustness towards local minima, however the solvers required for the inexact wave equation scale badly to 3D problems. We propose a reformulation of wavefield reconstruction inversion which involves the solution of the classical time-domain wave equation, and it is practical for large-scale problems. Applications to tilted-transverse isotropy synthetic datasets clearly demonstrate the advantage over traditional full-waveform inversion.},
	keywords = {FWI, SIAM, time domain, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAMGS/2021/rizzuti2021SIAMGSwrid/rizzuti2021SIAMGSwrid.pdf},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {louboutin2020SEGtwri,
	title = {Time-domain Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion in a TTI medium},
	number = {TR-CSE-2020-1},
	year = {2020},
	month = {4},
	institution = {Georgia Institute of Technology},
	abstract = {We introduce a generalization of time-domain wavefield reconstruction inversion to anisotropic acoustic modeling. Wavefield reconstruction inversion has been extensively researched in recent years for its ability to mitigate cycle skipping. The original method was formulated in the frequency domain with acoustic isotropic physics. However, frequency-domain modeling requires sophisticated iterative solvers that are difficult to scale to industrial-size problems and more realistic physical assumptions, such as tilted transverse isotropy, object of this study. The work presented here is based on a recently proposed dual formulation of wavefield reconstruction inversion, which allows time-domain propagator that are suitable to both large scales and more accurate physics.},
	keywords = {anisotropy, FWI, TTI, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2020/louboutin2020SEGtwri/louboutin2020SEGtwri.html},
	url2 = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.07355.pdf},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Gabrio Rizzuti and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {louboutin2020SIAMTXLAtdw,
	title = {Time-Domain Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion In Tilted Transverse Isostropic Media},
	booktitle = {SIAM Texas-Louisiana},
	year = {2020},
	note = {SIAMTXLA},
	month = {10},
	abstract = {We introduce a generalization of time-domain wavefield reconstruction inversion to anisotropic acoustic modeling. Wavefield reconstruction inversion has been extensively researched in recent years for its ability to mitigate cycle skipping. The original method was formulated in the frequency domain with acoustic isotropic physics. However, frequency-domain modeling requires sophisticated iterative solvers that are difficult to scale to industrial-size problems and more realistic physical assumptions, such as tilted transverse isotropy, object of this study. The work presented here is based on a recently proposed dual formulation of wavefield reconstruction inversion, which allows time-domain propagator that are suitable to both large scales and more accurate physics.},
	keywords = {FWI, Time-domain, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAMTXLA/2020/louboutin2020SIAMTXLAtdw/louboutin2020SIAMTXLAtdw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Gabrio Rizzuti and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {rizzuti2019SIAMGStwri,
	title = {A dual formulation for time-domain wavefield reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SIAM GS)},
	month = {03},
	abstract = {Wavefield reconstruction inversion (WRI) is based on the combination of data misfit and PDE-residual penalty terms, and it aims at the reconstruction of the optimal property model and field pair. A full-space optimization would require the storage of field variables for every frequency or time sample (and every source). Remedies via variable projection are well studied, but they entail the solution of a modified wave equation, which is costly both in frequency and time domain. Here, we explore an efficient alternative to WRI, where properties are complemented, instead, by elements of the dual data space. The starting point of our proposal is the denoising reformulation of WRI: the PDE compliance is optimized under the constraint of a given data fit. Since the field variable can be eliminated from the associated saddle-point problem, we obtain a new objective functional of only properties and Lagrange multipliers. Its evaluation, and gradient computation, involves the solution of the original wave equation, which is amenable to time-domain discretization. The optimization scheme of choice can now leverage on affordable storage of the iterates.},
	keywords = {WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAMGS/2019/rizzuti2019SIAMGStwri/rizzuti2019SIAMGStwri.pdf},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Emmanouil Daskalakis and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {fang2017sewri,
	title = {Source estimation for wavefield-reconstruction inversion},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {83},
	number = {4},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	pages = {R345-R359},
	abstract = {Source estimation is essential to all the wave-equation-based seismic inversions, including full-waveform inversion and the recently proposed wavefield-reconstruction inversion. When the source estimation is inaccurate, errors will propagate into the predicted data and introduce additional data misfit. As a consequence, inversion results that minimize this data misfit may become erroneous. To mitigate the errors introduced by the incorrect and pre-estimated sources, an embedded procedure that updates sources along with medium parameters is necessary for the inversion. So far, such a procedure is still missing in the context of wavefield-reconstruction inversion, a method that is, in many situations, less prone to local minima related to the so-called cycle skipping, compared to full-waveform inversion through exact data-fitting. While wavefield-reconstruction inversion indeed helps to mitigate issues related to cycle skipping by extending the search space with wavefields as auxiliary variables, it relies on having access to the correct source functions. In this paper, we remove the requirement of having the accurate source functions by proposing a source estimation technique specifically designed for wavefield-reconstruction inversion. To achieve this task, we consider the source functions as unknown variables and arrive at an objective function that depends on the medium parameters, wavefields, and source functions. During each iteration, we apply the so-called variable projection method to simultaneously project out the source functions and wavefields. After the projection, we obtain a reduced objective function that only depends on the medium parameters and invert for the unknown medium parameters by minimizing this reduced objective. Numerical experiments illustrate that this approach can produce accurate estimates of the unknown medium parameters without any prior information of the source functions.},
	keywords = {estimation, FWI, source, variable projection, WRI},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2017-0700.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2018/fang2017sewri/fang2017sewri.html},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {fang2016SEGuqw,
	title = {Uncertainty quantification for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion using a PDE free semidefinite Hessian and randomize-then-optimize method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1390-1394},
	abstract = {The data of full-waveform inversion often contains noise, which induces uncertainties in the inversion results. Ideally, one would like to run a number of independent inversions with different realizations of the noise and assess model-side uncertainties from the resulting models, however this is not feasible because we collect the data only once. To circumvent this restriction, various sampling schemes have been devised to generate an ensemble of models that fit the data to within the noise level. Such sampling schemes typically involve running multiple inversions or evaluating the Hessian of the cost function, both of which are computationally expensive. In this work, we propose a new method to quantify uncertainties based on a novel formulation of the full-waveform inversion problem {\textendash} wavefield reconstruction inversion. Based on this formulation, we formulate a semidefinite approximation of the corresponding Hessian matrix. By precomputing certain quantities, we are able to apply this Hessian to given input vectors without additional solutions of the underlying partial differential equations. To generate a sample, we solve an auxiliary stochastic optimization problem involving this Hessian. The result is a computationally feasible method that, with little overhead, can generate as many samples as required at small additional cost. We test our method on the synthetic BG Compass model and compare the results to a direct-sampling approach. The results show the feasibility of applying our method to computing statistical quantities such as the mean and standard deviation in the context of wavefield reconstruction inversion.},
	keywords = {SEG, Uncertainty quantification, WRI},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13879108.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/fang2016SEGuqw/fang2016SEGuqw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/fang2016SEGuqw/fang2016SEGuqw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Chia Ying Lee and Curt Da Silva and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2015SIAMpcf,
	title = {Pros and cons of full- and reduced-space methods for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, Stanford University, California)},
	month = {06-07},
	abstract = {By insisting on fitting observed data, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) is no longer cycle skipped and therefore less reliant on the accuracy of starting models. While extending the search space mitigates local minima, there are challenges scaling to 3D seismic when using reduced-space methods that require accurate solves. Conversely, full-space methods allow for inaccurate solves but require storage of all wavefields. We weigh pros and cons of these two approaches in the seismic context.},
	keywords = {FWI, SIAM, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2015/herrmann2015SIAMpcf/herrmann2015SIAMpcf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {fang2015EAGEsew,
	title = {Source estimation for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Wavefield reconstruction inversion is a new approach to waveform based inversion that helps overcome the {\textquoteleft}cycle skipping{\textquoteright} problem. However, like most waveform based inversion methods, wavefield reconstruction inversion also requires good source wavelets. Without correct source wavelets, wavefields cannot be reconstructed correctly and the velocity model cannot be updated correctly neither. In this work, we propose a source estimation method for wavefield reconstruction inversion based on the variable projection method. In this method, we reconstruct wavefields and estimate source wavelets simultaneously by solving an extended least-squares problem, which contains source wavelets. This approach does not increase the computational cost compared to conventional wavefield reconstruction inversion. Numerical results illustrates with our source estimation method we are able to recover source wavelets and obtain inversion results that are comparable to results obtained with true source wavelets.},
	keywords = {EAGE, source estimation, WRI},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201412588},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/fang2015EAGEsew/fang2015EAGEsew.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/fang2015EAGEsew/fang2015EAGEsew_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {fang2015IIPFWIuqw,
	title = {Uncertainty quantification for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	booktitle = {Inaugural Full-Waveform Inversion Workshop},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Natal, Brazil)},
	month = {08-09},
	abstract = {In this work, we propose a method to quantify the uncertainty of wavefield reconstruction inversion under the framework of Bayesian inference. Unlike the conventional method using the wave equation as the forward mapping, we involve the wave equation misfit in the posterior distribution and propose a new posterior distribution. The negative log-likelihood of the new distribution is less oscillatory than that of the conventional posterior distribution, and its Gauss-Newton Hessian is a diagonal matrix that can be generated without any additional computational cost. We use the diagonal Gauss-Newton Hessian to derive an approximate Gaussian distribution at the maximum likelihood point to quantify the uncertainty. This method makes the uncertainty quantification for WRI computationally tractable and is able to provide reasonable uncertainty analysis based on our numerical results.},
	keywords = {FWI, uncertainty, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IIPFWI/fang2015IIPFWIuqw/fang2015IIPFWIuqw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Chia Ying Lee and Curt Da Silva and Felix J. Herrmann and Rachel Kuske}
}
@conference {fang2015EAGEuqw,
	title = {Uncertainty quantification for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In this work, we propose a method to quantify the uncertainty of wavefield reconstruction inversion under the framework of Bayesian inference. Unlike the conventional method using the wave equation as the forward mapping, we involve the wave equation misfit in the posterior distribution and propose a new posterior distribution. The negative log-likelihood of the new distribution is less oscillatory than that of the conventional posterior distribution, and its Gauss-Newton Hessian is a diagonal matrix that can be generated without any additional computational cost. We use the diagonal Gauss-Newton Hessian to derive an approximate Gaussian distribution at the maximum likelihood point to quantify the uncertainty. This method makes the uncertainty quantification for WRI computationally tractable and is able to provide reasonable uncertainty analysis based on our numerical results.},
	keywords = {EAGE, FWI, UQ, WRI},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413198},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/fang2015EAGEuqw/fang2015EAGEuqw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/fang2015EAGEuqw/fang2015EAGEuqw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Chia Ying Lee and Curt Da Silva and Felix J. Herrmann and Rachel Kuske}
}
@conference {herrmann2015SIAMwri,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion {\textendash} reaping the benefits from extending the search space},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, Stanford University, California)},
	month = {06-07},
	keywords = {SIAM, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2015/herrmann2015SIAMwri/herrmann2015SIAMwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {fang2015IIPFWIwri,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with source estimation and its application to 2014 Chevron synthetic blind test dataset},
	booktitle = {Inaugural Full-Waveform Inversion Workshop},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Natal, Brazil)},
	month = {08-09},
	abstract = {We present a robust wavefield reconstruction inversion with source estimation. The source wavelet is estimated with the reconstruction of wavefield simultaneously by solving an extended data augmentation problem. We apply this method to the 2014 Chevron synthetic blind test dataset and show the robustness of our method.},
	keywords = {FWI, source estimation, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IIPFWI/fang2015IIPFWIwri/fang2015IIPFWIwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wang2015SIAMwds,
	title = {Wavefield-denoising and source encoding},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, Stanford University, California)},
	month = {06-07},
	keywords = {SIAM, source encoding, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2015/wang2015SIAMwds/wang2015SIAMwds_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rongrong Wang and Ozgur Yilmaz and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2015IIPFWIwri,
	title = {Wavefield-Reconstruction Inversion {\textemdash} WRI},
	booktitle = {Inaugural Full-Waveform Inversion Workshop},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Natal, Brazil)},
	month = {08-09},
	abstract = {We discuss a recently proposed novel method for waveform inversion: Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI). As opposed to conventional FWI {\textemdash} which attempts to minimize the error between observed and predicted data obtained by solving a wave equation {\textendash} WRI reconstructs a wave-field from the data and extracts a model-update from this wavefield by minimizing the wave-equation residual. The method does not require explicit computation of an adjoint wavefield as all the necessary information is contained in the reconstructed wavefield. We show how the corresponding model updates can be interpreted physically analogously to the conventional imaging-condition-based approach.},
	keywords = {FWI, inversion, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IIPFWI/herrmann2015IIPFWIwri/herrmann2015IIPFWIwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014ROSErpe,
	title = {Relax the physics and expand the search space {\textendash} FWI via Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	booktitle = {ROSE Consortium; Norway},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(ROSE Consortium)},
	month = {05},
	keywords = {Consortium, FWI, ROSE, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ROSE/2014/herrmann2014ROSErpe.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014SEGWS,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) {\textendash} a new take on wave-equation based inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Full Waveform Inversion - Elastic Approaches and Issues with Anisotropy, Nonshallow Inversion, Poor Starting Model; Denver},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Denver)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/herrmann2014SEGWSwri/herrmann2014SEGWSwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Bas Peters}
}
