@article {tu2015GJIsem,
	title = {Source estimation with surface-related multiples{\textendash}-fast ambiguity-resolved seismic imaging},
	journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
	volume = {205},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(published online in Geophysical Journal International)},
	month = {03},
	pages = {1492-1511},
	abstract = {We address the problem of obtaining a reliable seismic image without prior knowledge of the source wavelet, especially from data that contain strong surface-related multiples. Conventional reverse-time migration requires prior knowledge of the source wavelet, which is either technically or computationally challenging to accurately determine; inaccurate estimates of the source wavelet can result in seriously degraded reverse-time migrated images, and therefore wrong geological interpretations. To solve this problem, we present a "wavelet-free" imaging procedure that simultaneously inverts for the source wavelet and the seismic image, by tightly integrating source estimation into a fast least-squares imaging framework, namely compressive imaging, given a reasonably accurate background velocity model. However, this joint inversion problem is difficult to solve as it is plagued with local minima and the ambiguity with respect to amplitude scalings because of the multiplicative, and therefore nonlinear, appearance of the source wavelet in the otherwise linear formalism. We have found a way to solve this nonlinear joint-inversion problem using a technique called variable projection, and a way to overcome the scaling ambiguity by including surface-related multiples in our imaging procedure following recent developments in surface-related multiple prediction by sparse inversion. As a result, we obtain without prior knowledge of the source wavelet high-resolution seismic images, comparable in quality to images obtained assuming the true source wavelet is known. By leveraging the computationally efficient compressive-imaging methodology, these results are obtained at affordable computational costs compared with conventional processing work flows that include surface-related multiple removal and reverse-time migration.},
	keywords = {computational seismology, free surface, Inverse theory, multiples, seismic imaging, time series analysis, wave propagation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/GeophysicalJournalInternational/2016/tu2015GJIsem/tu2015GJIsem.pdf},
	url2 = {http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/205/3/1492.full.pdf?keytype=ref\&ijkey=zFydRGQpiJzeCS9},
	author = {Ning Tu and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Tim T.Y. Lin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {vanderneut2013GJIirs,
	title = {Interferometric redatuming by sparse inversion},
	journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
	volume = {192},
	year = {2013},
	month = {02},
	pages = {666-670},
	abstract = {Assuming that exact transmission responses are known between the surface and a particular depth level in the subsurface, seismic sources can be effectively mapped to that level by a process called interferometric redatuming. After redatuming, the obtained wavefields can be used for imaging below this particular depth level. Interferometric redatuming consists of two steps, namely (i) the decomposition of the observed wavefields into up- and down-going constituents and (ii) a multidimensional deconvolution of the up- and downgoing wavefields. While this method works in theory, sensitivity to noise and artifacts due to incomplete acquisition call for a different formulation. In this letter, we demonstrate the benefits of formulating the two steps that undergird interferometric redatuming in terms of a transform-domain sparsity-promoting program. By exploiting compressibility of seismic wavefields in the curvelet domain, we not only become robust with respect to noise but we are also able to remove certain artifacts while preserving the frequency content. These improvements lead to a better image of the target from the redatumed data.},
	keywords = {Controlled source seismology, Interferometry, Inverse theory},
	url = {http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/192/2/666},
	author = {Joost van der Neut and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
