@article {rizzuti2020dfw,
	title = {A dual formulation of wavefield reconstruction inversion for large-scale seismic inversion},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {86},
	number = {6},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1ND-Z3},
	abstract = {Many of the seismic inversion techniques currently proposed that focus on robustness with respect to the background model choice are not apt to large-scale 3D applications, and the methods that are computationally feasible for industrial problems, such as full waveform inversion, are notoriously limited by convergence stagnation and require adequate starting models. We propose a novel solution that is both scalable and less sensitive to starting models or inaccurate parameters (such as anisotropy) that are typically kept fixed during inversion. It is based on a dual reformulation of the classical wavefield reconstruction inversion, whose empirical robustness with respect to these issues is well documented in the literature. While the classical version is not suited to 3D, as it leverages expensive frequency-domain solvers for the wave equation, our proposal allows the deployment of state-of-the-art time-domain finite-difference methods, and is potentially mature for industrial-scale problems.},
	keywords = {3D, finite-difference, Full-waveform inversion, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2020-0743.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2021/rizzuti2020dfw/rizzuti2020dfw.html},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {rizzuti2020SEGuqavp,
	title = {Parameterizing uncertainty by deep invertible networks, an application to reservoir characterization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2020},
	note = {(SEG, virtual)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1541-1545},
	abstract = {Uncertainty quantification for full-waveform inversion provides a probabilistic characterization of the ill-conditioning of the problem, comprising the sensitivity of the solution with respect to the starting model and data noise. This analysis allows to assess the confidence in the candidate solution and how it is reflected in the tasks that are typically performed after imaging (e.g., stratigraphic segmentation following reservoir characterization). Classically, uncertainty comes in the form of a probability distribution formulated from Bayesian principles, from which we seek to obtain samples. A popular solution involves Monte Carlo sampling. Here, we propose instead an approach characterized by training a deep network that "pushes forward" Gaussian random inputs into the model space (representing, for example, density or velocity) as if they were sampled from the actual posterior distribution. Such network is designed to solve a variational optimization problem based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the posterior and the network output distributions. This work is fundamentally rooted in recent developments for invertible networks. Special invertible architectures, besides being computational advantageous with respect to traditional networks, do also enable analytic computation of the output density function. Therefore, after training, these networks can be readily used as a new prior for a related inversion problem. This stands in stark contrast with Monte-Carlo methods, which only produce samples. We validate these ideas with an application to angle-versus-ray parameter analysis for reservoir characterization.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, Uncertainty quantification},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2020-3428150.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2020/rizzuti2020SEGuqavp/rizzuti2020SEGuqavp.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2020/rizzuti2020SEGuqavp/rizzuti2020SEGuqavp_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2020/rizzuti2020SEGuqavp/rizzuti2020SEGuqavp_pres.mp4},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/Software.SEG2020},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Ali Siahkoohi and Philipp A. Witte and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {rizzuti2020EAGEtwri,
	title = {Time-domain wavefield reconstruction inversion for large-scale seismics},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2020},
	note = {Accepted in EAGE, withdrawn due to logistical challenge},
	month = {1},
	abstract = {Wavefield reconstruction inversion is an imaging technique akin to full-waveform inversion, albeit based on a relaxed version of the wave equation. This relaxation aims to beat the multimodality typical of full-waveform inversion. However it prevents the use of time-marching solvers for the augmented equation and, as a consequence, cannot be straightforwardly employed to large 3D problems. In this work, we formulate a dual version of wavefield reconstruction inversion amenable to explicit time-domain solvers, yielding a robust and scalable inversion technique.},
	keywords = {3D, EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Time-domain},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2020/rizzuti2020EAGEtwri/rizzuti2020EAGEtwri.html},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {rizzuti2019SEGadf,
	title = {A dual formulation for time-domain wavefield reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SEG, San Antonio)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1480-1485},
	abstract = {We illustrate a dual formulation for full-waveform inversion potentially apt to large 3-D problems. It is based on the optimization of the wave equation compliance, under the constraint of data misfit not exceeding a prescribed noise level. In the Lagrangian formulation, model and wavefield state variables are complemented with multipliers having the same dimension of data ("dual data" variables). Analogously to classical wavefield reconstruction inversion, the wavefield unknowns can be projected out in closed form, by solving a version of the augmented wave equation. This leads to a saddle-point problem whose variables are only model and dual data. As such, this formulation represents a model extension, and is potentially robust against local minima. The classical downsides of model extension methods and wavefield reconstruction inversion are here effectively mitigated: storage of the dual variables is affordable, the augmented wave equation is amenable to time-marching finite-difference schemes, and no continuation strategy for penalty parameters is needed, with the prospect of 3-D applications.},
	keywords = {3D, Full-waveform inversion, SEG, Time-domain},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2019-3216760.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/rizzuti2019SEGadf/rizzuti2019SEGadf.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/rizzuti2019SEGadf/rizzuti2019SEGadf_pres.pdf},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/Software.rizzuti2019SEGadf},
	author = {Gabrio Rizzuti and Mathias Louboutin and Rongrong Wang and Emmanouil Daskalakis and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {peters2019SEGans,
	title = {A numerical solver for least-squares sub-problems in 3D wavefield reconstruction inversion and related problem formulations},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SEG, San Antonio)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1536-1540},
	abstract = {Recent years saw a surge of interest in seismic waveform inversion approaches based on quadratic-penalty or augmented-Lagrangian methods, including Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion. These methods typically need to solve a least-squares sub-problem that contains a discretization of the Helmholtz equation. Memory requirements for direct solvers are often prohibitively large in three dimensions, and this limited the examples in the literature to two dimensions. We present an algorithm that uses iterative Helmholtz solvers as a black-box to solve the least-squares problem corresponding to 3D grids. This algorithm enables Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion and related formulations, in three dimensions. Our new algorithm also includes a root-finding method to convert a penalty into a constraint on the data-misfit without additional computational cost, by reusing precomputed quantities. Numerical experiments show that the cost of parallel communication and other computations are small compared to the main cost of solving one Helmholtz problem per source and one per receiver.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, least-squares, numerical linear algebra, penalty method, quadratic constraints, root finding, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2019-3216638.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/peters2019SEGans/peters2019SEGans.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/peters2019SEGans/peters2019SEGans_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2018SEGada,
	title = {A debiasing approach to microseismic},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2942-2946},
	abstract = {Microseismic data is often used to locate fracture locations and their origin in time created by fracking. Although surface microseismic data can have large apertures and is easier to acquire than the borehole data, it often suffers from poor signal to noise ratio (S/R). Poor S/R poses a challenge in terms of estimating the correct location and source-time function of a microseismic source. In this work, we propose a denoising step in combination with a computationally cheap debiasing based approach to locate microseismic sources and to estimate their source-time functions with correct amplitude from extremely noisy data. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our method can work with closely spaced microseismic sources with source-time functions of different peak amplitudes and frequencies. We have also shown the ability of our method with the smooth velocity model.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Imaging, microseismic, noise, SEG, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2997252.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/sharan2018SEGada/sharan2018SEGada.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/sharan2018SEGada/sharan2018SEGada_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rajiv Kumar and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {peters2018pmf,
	title = {Projection methods and applications for seismic nonlinear inverse problems with multiple constraints},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {84},
	number = {2},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {02},
	pages = {R251-R269},
	abstract = {Nonlinear inverse problems are often hampered by non-uniqueness and local minima because of missing low frequencies and far offsets in the data, lack of access to good starting models, noise, and modeling errors. A well-known approach to counter these deficiencies is to include prior information on the unknown model, which regularizes the inverse problem. While conventional regularization methods have resulted in enormous progress in ill-posed (geophysical) inverse problems, challenges remain when the prior information consists of multiple pieces. To handle this situation, we propose an optimization framework that allows us to add multiple pieces of prior information in the form of constraints. Compared to additive regularization penalties, constraints have a number of advantages making them more suitable for inverse problems such as full-waveform inversion. The proposed framework is rigorous because it offers assurances that multiple constraints are imposed uniquely at each iteration, irrespective of the order in which they are invoked. To project onto the intersection of multiple sets uniquely, we employ Dykstra{\textquoteright}s algorithm that scales to large problems and does not rely on trade-off parameters. In that sense, our approach differs substantially from approaches such as Tikhonov regularization, penalty methods, and gradient filtering. None of these offer assurances, which makes them less suitable to full-waveform inversion where unrealistic intermediate results effectively derail the iterative inversion process. By working with intersections of sets, we keep expensive objective and gradient calculations unaltered, separate from projections, and we also avoid trade-off parameters. These features allow for easy integration into existing code bases. In addition to more predictable behavior, working with constraints also allows for heuristics where we built up the complexity of the model gradually by relaxing the constraints. This strategy helps to avoid convergence to local minima that represent unrealistic models. We illustrate this unique feature with examples of varying complexity.},
	keywords = {constraints, Full-waveform inversion, intersection, Optimization, projection, regularization},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2018-0192.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2018/peters2018pmf/peters2018pmf.html},
	author = {Bas Peters and Brendan R. Smithyman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {esser2016tvr,
	title = {Total-variation regularization strategies in full-waveform inversion},
	journal = {SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences},
	volume = {11},
	number = {1},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences)},
	pages = {376-406},
	abstract = {We propose an extended full-waveform inversion formulation that includes general convex constraints on the model. Though the full problem is highly nonconvex, the overarching optimization scheme arrives at geologically plausible results by solving a sequence of relaxed and warm-started constrained convex subproblems. The combination of box, total-variation, and successively relaxed asymmetric total-variation constraints allows us to steer free from parasitic local minima while keeping the estimated physical parameters laterally continuous and in a physically realistic range. For accurate starting models, numerical experiments carried out on the challenging 2004 BP velocity benchmark demonstrate that bound and total-variation constraints improve the inversion result significantly by removing inversion artifacts, related to source encoding, and by clearly improved delineation of top, bottom, and flanks of a high-velocity high-contrast salt inclusion. The experiments also show that for poor starting models these two constraints by themselves are insufficient to detect the bottom of high-velocity inclusions such as salt. Inclusion of the one-sided asymmetric total-variation constraint overcomes this issue by discouraging velocity lows to buildup during the early stages of the inversion. To the author{\textquoteright}s knowledge the presented algorithm is the first to successfully remove the imprint of local minima caused by poor starting models and band-width limited finite aperture data.},
	keywords = {constrained optimization, Full-waveform inversion, hinge loss, salt, total variation},
	doi = {10.1137/17M111328X},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/SIAMJournalOnImagingSciences/2018/esser2016tvr/esser2016tvr.pdf},
	url2 = {https://doi.org/10.1137/17M111328X},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2017SEGhrf,
	title = {High resolution fast microseismic source collocation and source time function estimation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(SEG, Houston)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {2778-2783},
	abstract = {Sparsity promotion based joint microseismic source collocation and source time function estimation, using Linearized Bregman algorithm, although simple to implement, suffers from slow convergence. This is due to the fact that Linearized Bregman algorithm has only first order of convergence. In this work, we propose to accelerate the existing Linearized Bregman algorithm using the L-BFGS algorithm. Without any initial guess for the source location or source time function, our method is able to estimate the source location and source time function for kinematically correct smooth velocity model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for multiple sources spaced within half a wavelength. We also compare our results with Linearized Bregman based method in {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}2.5{\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}D instead of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}2{\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}D.},
	keywords = {algorithm, Full-waveform inversion, microseismic, passive imaging, SEG, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2017-17787749.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2017/sharan2017SEGhrf/sharan2017SEGhrf.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2017/sharan2017SEGhrf/sharan2017SEGhrf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {witte2017SIAMlsw,
	title = {Large-scale workflows for wave-equation based inversion in Julia},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Atlanta)},
	month = {02-03},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion is a PDE-constrained optimisation problem involving massive amounts of data (petabytes) and large numbers of unknowns (O(10^9)). This well known compute-intensive and data-intensive is extremely challenging for several reasons. First, there is the complexity of having to handle extremely large data volumes with metadata related to experimental details in the field, and the discretization of the unknown earth parameters and approximate physics. Second, reduced or adjoint-state methods call for computationally intensive PDE solves for each source experiment (of which there are thousands) for each iteration of a gradient-based optimization scheme. The talks will give an overview how carefully chosen layers of abstraction can help manage both the complexity and scale of inversion while still achieving the high degree of computational performance required to make full-waveform a practical tool. Specifically, the presentations will focus on domain specific stencil language for time-stepping methods to solve various types of wave equations and on abstracts for large-scale parallel optimization frameworks.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Julia, large scale, least-squares migration, SIAM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2017/witte2017SIAMlsw/witte2017SIAMlsw_pres.mov},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2017/witte2017SIAMlsw/witte2017SIAMlsw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Philipp A. Witte and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2016SEGWScvp,
	title = {Constraints versus penalties for edge-preserving full-waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Where are we heading with FWI; Dallas},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion is arguably one of the most challenging inverse problems out there. For this reason, it is remarkable that so much progress has been made over the years. While we can look back with confidence at an increasing number of success stories, the application of full-waveform technologies to deeper targets and complex geologies remains challenging making it an expensive proposition. So far, efforts to overcome some of these challenges have mainly been directed towards extended formulations such as Symes{\textquoteright}s and Biondi{\textquoteright}s subsurface offset/rau-parameters, Mike Warner/Lluis Guasch{\textquoteright}s Wiener filters in their adaptive full-waveform inversion, and van Leeuwen/Herrmann{\textquoteright}s Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion, where the wave-equation appears as a least-squares term in the objective. While this recent work {\textendash}- including other approaches such as different data-misfit objective functions {\textendash}- has removed some of FWI cycle-skip issues it does, with the exception perhaps of box constraints, not incorporate rudimentary information on the geology on the unknown model. Following recent work by Ernie Esser, we present a general framework how to incorporate this type of information in the form of constraints. Contrary to Tikhonov-like regularization or gradient filtering, imposing constraints has several key advantages, namely (i) they can be expressed in simple human understandable terms such as lower and upper limits for the velocity without the necessity to introduce additional parameters and assumptions on the probability distribution of the model; (ii) they can consist of several constraints, e.g. box and smoothness constraints, as long as their intersection in non-empty; and (iii) they can be imposed in a separate inner loop, which does not affect gradients and Hessians of full-waveform inversion itself. By means of examples, we will demonstrate the advocacy of constrained formulations as they apply to full-waveform inversion. This is joint work with Bas Peters.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/herrmann2016SEGWScvp/herrmann2016SEGWScvp_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {deaguiar2016SCdff,
	title = {DeVito: fast finite difference computation},
	booktitle = {Super Computing (SC16)},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(Super Computing, Utah)},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Seismic imaging, used in energy exploration, is arguably the most compute and data intensive application in the private sector. The commonly used methods involve solving the wave equations numerically using finite difference formulations. Writing optimized code for these applications involves multiple man-years of effort that need to be repeated every time a new development needs to be factored in {\textendash} for every target platform. DeVito is a new tool for performing optimized Finite Difference (FD) computation from high-level symbolic problem definitions. The application developer needs to provide a differential equation in symbolic form. DeVito performs automated code generation and Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation based on this symbolic equation to create and execute highly optimized Finite Difference kernels on multiple computer platforms. DeVito has been designed to be used as part of complex workflows involving data flows across multiple applications over different nodes of a cluster.},
	keywords = {finite differences, Full-waveform inversion, high performance computing},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SC/2016/deaguiar2016SCdff/deaguiar2016SCdff_poster.pdf},
	url2 = {http://sc16.supercomputing.org/sc-archive/tech_poster/tech_poster_pages/post155.html},
	author = {Marcos de Aguiar and Gerard Gorman and Felix J. Herrmann and Navjot Kukreja and Michael Lange and Mathias Louboutin and Felippe Vieira Zacarias}
}
@article {li2015GEOPmgn,
	title = {Modified Gauss-Newton full-waveform inversion explained{\textendash}-why sparsity-promoting updates do matter},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {81},
	number = {3},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {R125-R138},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion can be formulated as a nonlinear least-squares optimization problem. This non-convex problem can be extremely computationally expensive because it requires repeatedly solving large linear systems that correspond to discretized partial differential equations. Randomized subsampling techniques allow us to work with small subsets of (monochromatic) source experiments, reducing the computational cost. However, this subsampling weakens subsurface illumination and introduces subsampling related incoherent artifacts. These subsampling-related artifacts{\textendash}-in conjunction with local minima that are known to plague full-waveform inversion{\textendash}-motivate us to come up with a technique to "regularize" this problem. Following earlier work, we take advantage of the fact that curvelets represent subsurface models and perturbations parsimoniously. At first impulse promoting sparsity on the model directly seems the most natural way to proceed, but we will demonstrate that in certain cases it can be advantageous to promote sparsity on the Gauss-Newton updates instead. While constraining the one-norm of the descent directions does not change not change the underlying full-waveform inversion objective, the constrained model updates remain descent directions, remove subsampling-related artifacts and improve the overall inversion result. We empirically observe this phenomenon in situations where the different model updates occur at roughly the same locations in the curvelet domain. We further investigate and analyze this phenomenon, where nonlinear inversions benefit from sparsity-promoting constraints on the updates, by means of a set of carefully selected examples including phase retrieval and full-waveform inversion. In all cases, we observe a faster decay of the residual and model error as a function of the number of iterations.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Gauss-Newton method, sparsity promotion},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2015-0266.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2016/li2015GEOPmgn/li2015GEOPmgn.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {dasilva2016SEGuse,
	title = {A unified 2D/3D software environment for large scale time-harmonic full waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1169-1173},
	abstract = {Full-Waveform Inversion is a costly and complex procedure for realistically sized 3D seismic data. The performance-critical nature of this problem often results in software environments that are written entirely in low-level languages, making them hard to understand, maintain, improve, and extend. The unreadability of such codes can stymie research developments, where the translation from higher level mathematical ideas to high performance codes can be lost, inhibiting the uptake of new ideas in production-level codebases. We propose a new software organization paradigm for Full-Waveform Inversion and other PDE-constrained optimization problems that is flexible, efficient, scalable, and demonstrably correct. We decompose the various structural components of FWI in to its constituent components, from parallel computation to assembling objective functions and gradients to lower level matrix-vector multiplications. This decomposition allows us to create a framework where individual components can be easily swapped out to suit a particular user{\textquoteright}s existing software environment. The ease of applying high-level algorithms to the FWI problem allows us to easily implement stochastic FWI and demonstrate its effectiveness on a large scale 3D problem.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, large scale, numerical analysis, SEG, software},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13869051.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/dasilva2016SEGuse/dasilva2016SEGuse.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/dasilva2016SEGuse/dasilva2016SEGuse_pres.pdf},
	author = {Curt Da Silva and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {esser2015SEGasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textendash}- Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG, New Orleans)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1337-1343},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {convex constraints, Full-waveform inversion, salt, SEG, total-variation norm},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2015-5877995.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {louboutin2015SEGtcs,
	title = {Time compressively sampled full-waveform inversion with stochastic optimization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG, New Orleans)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {5153-5157},
	abstract = {Time-domain Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI) aims to image the subsurface of the earth accurately from field recorded data and can be solved via the reduced adjoint-state method. However, this method requires access to the forward and adjoint wavefields that are meet when computing gradient updates. The challenge here is that the adjoint wavefield is computed in reverse order during time stepping and therefore requires storage or other type of mitigation because storing the full time history of the forward wavefield is too expensive in realistic 3D settings. To overcome this challenge, we propose an approximate adjoint-state method where the wavefields are subsampled randomly, which drastically the amount of storage needed. By using techniques from stochastic optimization, we control the errors induced by the subsampling. Examples of the proposed technique on a synthetic but realistic 2D model show that the subsampling-related artifacts can be reduced significantly by changing the sampling for each source after each model update. Combination of this gradient approximation with a quasi-Newton method shows virtually artifact free inversion results requiring only 5\% of storage compared to saving the history at Nyquist. In addition, we avoid having to recompute the wavefields as is required by checkpointing.},
	keywords = {acoustic, Full-waveform inversion, inversion, SEG, Stochastic optimization, Subsampling, Time-domain},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2015-5924937.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/louboutin2015SEGtcs/louboutin2015SEGtcs.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/louboutin2015SEGtcs/louboutin2015SEGtcs_poster.pdf},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {peters2015AIPwri,
	title = {Wavefield-reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {Conference on Applied Inverse Problems},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(AIP, Helsinki)},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion is a method for PDE-constrained optimization, which revolves around the estimation of fields using the PDE as well as the observed data in a least-squares sense. The method is quadratic penalty based, which offers some interesting possibilities for the construction of algorithms, compared to the Lagrangian form. One of the main benefits of the method is when the initial guess is far from the global minimizer. Reduced-space and full-space algorithms are discussed, including illustrative examples. The method was developed with seismic applications in mind, but applies to other PDE-constrained optimization problems as well.},
	keywords = {AIP, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, penalty method, Waveform reconstruction inversion},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/AIP/2015/peters2015AIPwri/peters2015AIPwri.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {smithyman2014SEGjfw,
	title = {Joint full-waveform inversion of on-land surface and VSP data from the Permian Basin},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2014-4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {04},
	institution = {UBC},
	abstract = {Full-waveform Inversion is applied to generate a high-resolution model of P-wave velocity for a site in the Permian Basin, Texas, USA. This investigation jointly inverts seismic waveforms from a surface 3-D vibroseis surface seismic survey and a co-located 3-D Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP) survey, which shared common source Vibration Points (VPs). The resulting velocity model captures features that were not resolvable by conventional migration velocity analysis.},
	keywords = {downhole receivers, Full-waveform inversion, land, seismic, vibroseis},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2014/smithyman2014SEGjfw/smithyman2014SEGjfw.html},
	author = {Brendan R. Smithyman and Bas Peters and Bryan DeVault and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {leeuwen2014EAGEntf,
	title = {A new take on FWI: wavefield reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We discuss a recently proposed novel method for waveform inversion: Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI). As opposed to conventional FWI {\textendash} which attempts to minimize the error between observed and predicted data obtained by solving a wave equation {\textendash} WRI reconstructs a wave-field from the data and extracts a model-update from this wavefield by minimizing the wave-equation residual. The method does not require explicit computation of an adjoint wavefield as all the necessary information is contained in the reconstructed wavefield. We show how the corresponding model updates can be interpreted physically analogously to the conventional imaging-condition-based approach.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, penalty method, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20140703},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/leeuwen2014EAGEntf/leeuwen2014EAGEntf.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/leeuwen2014EAGEntf/leeuwen2014EAGEntf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {peters2014SEGsrh,
	title = {A sparse reduced Hessian approximation for multi-parameter wavefield reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1206-1210},
	abstract = {Multi-Parameter full-waveform inversion is a challenging problem, because the unknown parameters appear in the same wave equation and the magnitude of the parameters can vary many orders of magnitude. This makes accurate estimation of multiple-parameters very difficult. To mitigate the problems, sequential strategies, regularization methods and scalings of gradients and quasi-Newton Hessians have been proposed. All of these require design, fine-tuning and adaptation to different waveform inversion problems. We propose to use a sparse approximation to the Hessian derived from a penalty-formulation of the objective function. Sparseness allows to have the Hessian in memory and compute update directions at very low cost. This results in decent reconstruction of the multiple parameters at very low additional memory and computational expense.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Hessian, Optimization, penalty method, SEG},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1667.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/peters2014SEGsrh/peters2014SEGsrh.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/peters2014SEGsrh/peters2014SEGsrh_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {peters2014EAGEweb,
	title = {Wave-equation based inversion with the penalty method: adjoint-state versus wavefield-reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In this paper we make a comparison between wave-equation based inversions based on the adjoint-state and penalty methods. While the adjoint-state method involves the minimization of a data-misfit and exact solutions of the wave-equation for the current velocity model, the penalty-method aims to first find a wavefield that jointly fits the data and honours the physics, in a least-squares sense. Given this reconstructed wavefield, which is a proxy for the true wavefield in the true model, we calculate updates for the velocity model. Aside from being less nonlinear{\textendash}the acoustic wave equation is linear in the wavefield and model parameters but not in both{\textendash}the inversion is carried out over a solution space that includes both the model and the wavefield. This larger search space allows the algortihm to circumnavigate local minima, very much in the same way as recently proposed model extentions try to acomplish. We include examples for low frequencies, where we compare full-waveform inversion results for both methods, for good and bad starting models, and for high frequencies where we compare reverse-time migration with linearized imaging based on wavefield-reconstruction inversion. The examples confirm the expected benefits of the proposed method.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Imaging, Optimization, penalty method},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20140704},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/peters2014EAGEweb/peters2014EAGEweb.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/peters2014EAGEweb/peters2014EAGEweb_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe,
	title = {Optimization driven model-space versus data-space approaches to invert elastic data with the acoustic wave equation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {986-990},
	abstract = {Inverting data with elastic phases using an acoustic wave equation can lead to erroneous results, especially when the number of iterations is too high, which may lead to over fitting the data. Several approaches have been proposed to address this issue. Most commonly, people apply "data-independent" filtering operations that are aimed to deemphasize the elastic phases in the data in favor of the acoustic phases. Examples of this approach are nested loops over offset range and Laplace parameters. In this paper, we discuss two complementary optimization-driven methods where the minimization process decides adaptively which of the data or model components are consistent with the objective. Specifically, we compare the Student{\textquoteright}s t misfit function as the data-space alternative and curvelet-domain sparsity promotion as the model-space alternative. Application of these two methods to a realistic synthetic lead to comparable results that we believe can be improved by combining these two methods.},
	keywords = {elastic, Full-waveform inversion, least-squares, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1375.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Anais Tamalet and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SEGffw,
	title = {Fast full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/HerrmannSEG2011fws/HerrmannSEG2011fws.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {aravkin2011SIAMfwi,
	title = {Full waveform inversion with compressive updates},
	booktitle = {SIAM},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SIAM CS\&E 2011},
	organization = {SIAM CS\&E 2011},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on large multi-experiment data volumes. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current push for higher quality models reveals fundamental shortcomings handling increasing problem sizes numerically. To address this fundamental issue, we propose a randomized dimensionality-reduction strategy motivated by recent developments in stochastic optimization and compressive sensing. In this formulation conventional Gauss-Newton iterations are replaced by dimensionality-reduced sparse recovery problems with source encodings.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2011/aravkin2011SIAMfwi/aravkin2011SIAMfwi.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and James V. Burke and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SLRAfwi,
	title = {Full waveform inversion with compressive updates},
	booktitle = {SLRA},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {Sparse and Low Rank Approximation 2011},
	organization = {Sparse and Low Rank Approximation 2011},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on large multi-experiment data volumes. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current push for higher quality models reveals fundamental shortcomings handling increasing problem sizes numerically. To address this fundamental issue, we propose a randomized dimensionality-reduction strategy motivated by recent developments in stochastic optimization and compressive sensing. In this formulation conventional Gauss-Newton iterations are replaced by dimensionality-reduced sparse recovery problems with source encodings.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SLRA/2011/herrmann2011SLRAfwi/herrmann2011SLRAfwi.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Xiang Li and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {li2011EAGEfwirr,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion with randomized L1 recovery for the model updates},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a data fitting procedure that relies on the collection of seismic data volumes and sophisticated computing to create high-resolution results. With the advent of FWI, the improvements in acquisition and inversion have been substantial, but these improvements come at a high cost because FWI involves extremely large multi-experiment data volumes. The main obstacle is the "curse of dimensionality" exemplified by Nyquist{\~O}s sampling criterion, which puts a disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. In this paper, we address the "curse of dimensionality" by randomized dimensionality reduction of the FWI problem adapted from the field of CS. We invert for model updates by replacing the Gauss-Newton linearized subproblem for subsampled FWI with a sparsity promoting formulation, and solve this formulation using the SPGl1 algorithm. We speed up the algorithm and avoid overfitting the data by solving for the linearized updates only approximately. Our approach is successful because it reduces the size of seismic data volumes without loss of information. With this reduction, we can compute a Newton-like update with the reduced data volume at the cost of roughly one gradient update for the fully sampled wavefield.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/li11EAGEfwirr/li11EAGEfwirr.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/li11EAGEfwirr/li11EAGEfwirr_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=50345},
	author = {Xiang Li and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2011ICIAMconvexcompfwi,
	title = {FWI with sparse recovery: a convex-composite approach},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {Iterative inversion algorithms require repeated simulation of 3D time-dependent acoustic, elastic, or electromagnetic wave fields, extending hundreds of wavelengths and hundreds of periods. Also, seismic data is rich in information at every representable scale. Thus simulation-driven optimization approaches to inversion impose great demands on simulator efficiency and accuracy. While computer hardware advances have been of critical importance in bringing inversion closer to practical application, algorithmic advances in simulator methodology have been equally important. Speakers in this two-part session will address a variety of numerical issues arising in the wave simulation, and in its application to inversion.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, ICIAM, Optimization},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/herrmann2011ICIAMconvexcompfwi/herrmann2011ICIAMconvexcompfwi.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011EAGEhsdomwi,
	title = {A hybrid stochastic-deterministic optimization method for waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Present-day high quality 3D acquisition can give us lower frequencies and longer offsets with which to invert. However, the computational costs involved in handling this data explosion are tremendous. Therefore, recent developments in full-waveform inversion have been geared towards reducing the computational costs involved. A key aspect of several approaches that have been proposed is a dramatic reduction in the number of sources used in each iteration. A reduction in the number of sources directly translates to less PDE-solves and hence a lower computational cost. Recent attention has been drawn towards reducing the sources by randomly combining the sources in to a few supershots, but other strategies are also possible. In all cases, the full data misfit, which involves all the sequential sources, is replaced by a reduced misfit that is much cheaper to evaluate because it involves only a small number of sources (batchsize). The batchsize controls the accuracy with which the reduced misfit approximates the full misfit. The optimization of such an inaccurate, or noisy, misfit is the topic of stochastic optimization. In this paper, we propose an optimization strategy that borrows ideas from the field of stochastic optimization. The main idea is that in the early stage of the optimization, far from the true model, we do not need a very accurate misfit. The strategy consists of gradually increasing the batchsize as the iterations proceed. We test the proposed strategy on a synthetic dataset. We achieve a very reasonable inversion result at the cost of roughly 13 evaluations of the full misfit. We observe a speed-up of roughly a factor 20.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=50341},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann and Mark Schmidt and Michael P. Friedlander}
}
@conference {li2011SBGFmgnsu,
	title = {Modified Gauss-Newton with sparse updates},
	booktitle = {SBGF},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SBGF},
	organization = {SBGF},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a data fitting procedure that relies on the collection of seismic data volumes and sophisticated computing to create high-resolution models.With the advent of FWI, the improvements in acquisition and inversion have been substantial, but these improvements come at a high cost because FWI involves extremely large multi-experiment data volumes. The main obstacle is the {\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright} exemplified by Nyquist{\textquoteright}s sampling criterion, which puts a disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. In this paper, we address the {\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright} by using randomized dimensionality reduction of the FWI problem, coupled with a modified Gauss-Newton (GN) method designed to promote curvelet-domain sparsity of model updates. We solve for these updates using the spectral projected gradient method, implemented in the SPG1 software package. Our approach is successful because it reduces the size of seismic data volumes without loss of information. With this reduction, we can compute Gauss-Newton updates with the reduced data volume at the cost of roughly one gradient update for the fully sampled wavefield},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SBGF},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SBGF/2011/li11SBGFmgnsu/li11SBGFmgnsu.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SPIEmsp,
	title = {A modified, sparsity promoting, Gauss-Newton algorithm for seismic waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {Proc. SPIE},
	number = {81380V},
	year = {2011},
	month = {08},
	abstract = {Images obtained from seismic data are used by the oil and gas industry for geophysical exploration. Cutting-edge methods for transforming the data into interpretable images are moving away from linear approximations and high-frequency asymptotics towards Full Waveform Inversion (FWI), a nonlinear data-fitting procedure based on full data modeling using the wave-equation. The size of the problem, the nonlinearity of the forward model, and ill-posedness of the formulation all contribute to a pressing need for fast algorithms and novel regularization techniques to speed up and improve inversion results. In this paper, we design a modified Gauss-Newton algorithm to solve the PDE- constrained optimization problem using ideas from stochastic optimization and compressive sensing. More specifically, we replace the Gauss-Newton subproblems by randomly subsampled, -$\ell_1$ regularized subproblems. This allows us us significantly reduce the computational cost of calculating the updates and exploit the compressibility of wavefields in Curvelets. We explain the relationships and connections between the new method and stochastic optimization and compressive sensing (CS), and demonstrate the efficacy of the new method on a large-scale synthetic seismic example.},
	keywords = {Compressive Sensing, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, SLIM},
	issn = {1},
	doi = {10.1117/12.893861},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SPIE/2011/herrmann2011SPIEmsp/herrmann2011SPIEmsp.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Xiang Li and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {aravkin2011EAGEnspf,
	title = {A nonlinear sparsity promoting formulation and algorithm for full waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. FWI is typically formulated as a nonlinear least squares optimization problem, and various regularization techniques are used to guide the optimization because the problem is illposed. In this paper, we propose a novel sparse regularization which exploits the ability of curvelets to efficiently represent geophysical images. We then formulate a corresponding sparsity promoting constrained optimization problem, which we call Nonlinear Basis Pursuit Denoise (NBPDN) and present an algorithm to solve this problem to recover medium parameters. The utility of the NBPDN formulation and efficacy of the algorithm are demonstrated on a stylized cross-well experiment, where a sparse velocity perturbation is recovered with higher quality than the standard FWI formulation (solved with LBFGS). The NBPDN formulation and algorithm can recover the sparse perturbation even when the data volume is compressed to 5 \% of the original size using random superposition.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/aravkin11EAGEnspf/aravkin11EAGEnspf.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/aravkin11EAGEnspf/aravkin11EAGEnspf_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=50199},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and James V. Burke and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {aravkin2011SEGrobust,
	title = {Robust full-waveform inversion using the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {09},
	pages = {2669-2673},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. Robust methods for FWI are needed to overcome sensitivity to noise and in cases where modeling is particularly poor or far from the real data generating process. We survey previous robust methods from a statistical perspective, and use this perspective to derive a new robust method by assuming the random errors in our model arise from the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution. We show that in contrast to previous robust methods, the new method progres- sively down-weighs large outliers, effectively ignoring them once they are large enough. This suggests that the new method is more robust and suitable for situations with very poor data quality or modeling. Experiments show that the new method recovers as well or better than previous robust methods, and can recover models with quality comparable to standard methods on noise-free data when some of the data is completely corrupted, and even when a marine acquisition mask is entirely ignored in the modeling. The ability to ignore a marine acquisition mask via robust FWI methods offers an opportunity for stochastic optimization methods in marine acquisition.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3627747},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/aravkin11SEGrobust/aravkin11SEGrobust.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011ICIAMrfwiu,
	title = {Robust FWI using Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {Iterative inversion algorithms require repeated simulation of 3D time-dependent acoustic, elastic, or electromagnetic wave fields, extending hundreds of wavelengths and hundreds of periods. Also, seismic data is rich in information at every representable scale. Thus simulation-driven optimization approaches to inversion impose great demands on simulator efficiency and accuracy. While computer hardware advances have been of critical importance in bringing inversion closer to practical application, algorithmic advances in simulator methodology have been equally important. Speakers in this two-part session will address a variety of numerical issues arising in the wave simulation, and in its application to inversion.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, ICIAM, Optimization, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/aravkin2011ICIAMrfwiu/aravkin2011ICIAMrfwiu.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011ICIAMspf,
	title = {Sparsity promoting formulations and algorithms for FWI},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Presented at AMP Medical and Seismic Imaging, 2011, Vancouver BC.},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. FWI is typically formulated as a nonlinear least squares optimization problem, and various regularization techniques are used to guide the optimization because the problem is ill-posed. We propose a novel sparse regularization which exploits the ability of curvelets to efficiently represent geophysical images. We then formulate a corresponding sparsity promoting constrained optimization problem, which we solve using an open source algorithm. The techniques are applicable to any inverse problem where sparsity modeling is appropriate. We demonstrate the efficacy of the formulation on a toy example (stylized cross-well experiment) and on a realistic Seismic example (partial Marmoussi model). We also discuss the tradeoff between model fit and sparsity promotion, with a view to extend existing techniques for linear inverse problems to the case where the forward model is nonlinear.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, Presentation, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/aravkin2011ICIAMspf/aravkin2011ICIAMspf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and James V. Burke and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011EAGEspfwi,
	title = {Sparsity promoting formulations and algorithms for FWI},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/Aravkin2011EAGEspfwi/Aravkin2011EAGEspfwi.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and James V. Burke and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2010SEGfwi,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion from compressively recovered model updates},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {29},
	year = {2010},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1029-1033},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on the collection of large multi-experiment data volumes in combination with a sophisticated back-end to create high-fidelity inversion results. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current trend of incessantly pushing for higher quality models in increasingly complicated regions of the Earth reveals fundamental shortcomings in our ability to handle increasing problem size numerically. Two main culprits can be identified. First, there is the so-called {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} exemplified by Nyquist{\textquoteright}s sampling criterion, which puts disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. Secondly, there is the recent {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}departure from Moore{\textquoteright}s law{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} that forces us to lower our expectations to compute ourselves out of this. In this paper, we address this situation by randomized dimensionality reduction, which we adapt from the field of compressive sensing. In this approach, we combine deliberate randomized subsampling with structure-exploiting transform-domain sparsity promotion. Our approach is successful because it reduces the size of seismic data volumes without loss of information. With this reduction, we compute Newton-like updates at the cost of roughly one gradient update for the fully-sampled wavefield.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Presentation, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3513022},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/li10SEGfwi/li10SEGfwi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/li10SEGfwi/li10SEGfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {moghaddam2010SEGrfw,
	title = {Randomized full-waveform inversion: a dimenstionality-reduction approach},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {29},
	year = {2010},
	month = {10},
	pages = {977-982},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on the collection of large multi-experiment data volumes in combination with a sophisticated back-end to create high-fidelity inversion results. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current trend of incessantly pushing for higher quality models in increasingly complicated regions of the Earth reveals fundamental shortcomings in our ability to handle increasing problem sizes numerically. Two main culprits can be identified. First, there is the so-called {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} exemplified by Nyquist{\textquoteright}s sampling criterion, which puts disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. Secondly, there is the recent {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}departure from Moore{\textquoteright}s law{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} that forces us to develop algorithms that are amenable to parallelization. In this paper, we discuss different strategies that address these issues via randomized dimensionality reduction.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, Presentation, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3513940},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/moghaddam10SEGrfw/moghaddam10SEGrfw.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/moghaddam10SEGrfw/moghaddam10SEGrfw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Peyman P. Moghaddam and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
