@conference {tu2013SEGcle,
	title = {Controlling linearization errors in $\ell_1$ regularized inversion by rerandomization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4640-4644},
	abstract = {Linearized inversion is a data fitting procedure that tries to match the observed seismic data with data predicted by linearized modelling. In practice, the observed data is not necessarily in the column space of the linearized modelling operator. This can be caused by lack of an accurate background velocity model or by coherent noises not explained by linearized modelling. Through carefully designed experiments, we ob- serve that a moderate data mismatch does not pose an issue if we can use all the data in the inversion. However, artifacts do arise from the mismatch when randomized dimensionality reduction techniques are adopted to speed up the inversion. To stabilize the inversion for dimensionality reduction with randomized source aggregates, we propose to rerandomize by drawing independent simultaneous sources occasionally during the inversion. The effect of this rerandomization is remarkable because it results in virtually artifact-free images at a cost comparable to a single reverse-time migration. Implications of our method are profound because we are now able to resolve fine-scale steep subsalt features in a computationally feasible manner.},
	keywords = {inversion, message passing, rerandomization, SEG, sparsity},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1302.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGcle/tu2013SEGcle.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGcle/tu2013SEGcle_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ning Tu and Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe,
	title = {Optimization driven model-space versus data-space approaches to invert elastic data with the acoustic wave equation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {986-990},
	abstract = {Inverting data with elastic phases using an acoustic wave equation can lead to erroneous results, especially when the number of iterations is too high, which may lead to over fitting the data. Several approaches have been proposed to address this issue. Most commonly, people apply "data-independent" filtering operations that are aimed to deemphasize the elastic phases in the data in favor of the acoustic phases. Examples of this approach are nested loops over offset range and Laplace parameters. In this paper, we discuss two complementary optimization-driven methods where the minimization process decides adaptively which of the data or model components are consistent with the objective. Specifically, we compare the Student{\textquoteright}s t misfit function as the data-space alternative and curvelet-domain sparsity promotion as the model-space alternative. Application of these two methods to a realistic synthetic lead to comparable results that we believe can be improved by combining these two methods.},
	keywords = {elastic, Full-waveform inversion, least-squares, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1375.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Anais Tamalet and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2012SEGfwi,
	title = {FWI from the West Coasts: lessons learned from "Gulf of Mexico Imaging Challenges: What Can Full Waveform Inversion Achieve?"},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on FWI; Las Vegas},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/herrmann2012SEGfwi/herrmann2012SEGfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li and Brendan R. Smithyman and Eric Takam Takougang and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2012SEGspmamp,
	title = {Sparsity-promoting migration accelerated by message passing},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2012},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-6},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Seismic imaging via linearized inversion requires multiple iterations to minimize the least-squares misfit as a function of the medium perturbation. Unfortunately, the cost for these iterations are prohibitive because each iteration requires many wave-equation simulations, which without direct solvers require an expensive separate solve for each source. To overcome this problem, we use dimensionality-reduction to decrease the size of seismic imaging problem by turning the large number of sequential shots into a much small number of simultaneous shots. In our approach, we take advantage of sparsifying transforms to remove source crosstalk resulting from randomly weighting and stacking sequential shots into a few super shots. We also take advantage of the fact that the convergence of large-scale sparsity-promoting solvers can be improved significantly by borrowing ideas from message passing, which are designed to break correlation built up between the linear system and the model iterate. In this way, we arrive at a formulation where we run the sparsity-promoting solver for a relatively large number of very iterations. Aside from leading to a significant speed up, our approach had the advantage of greatly reducing the memory imprint and IO requirements. We demonstrate this feature by solving a sparsity-promoting imaging problem with operators of reverse-time migration, which is computationally infeasible without the dimensionality reduction.},
	keywords = {Imaging, inversion, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2012-1500.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/li2012SEGspmamp/li2012SEGspmamp.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/li2012SEGspmamp/li2012SEGspmamp_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SEGffw,
	title = {Fast full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/HerrmannSEG2011fws/HerrmannSEG2011fws.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {li2010SEGfwi,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion from compressively recovered model updates},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {29},
	year = {2010},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1029-1033},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on the collection of large multi-experiment data volumes in combination with a sophisticated back-end to create high-fidelity inversion results. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current trend of incessantly pushing for higher quality models in increasingly complicated regions of the Earth reveals fundamental shortcomings in our ability to handle increasing problem size numerically. Two main culprits can be identified. First, there is the so-called {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} exemplified by Nyquist{\textquoteright}s sampling criterion, which puts disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. Secondly, there is the recent {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}departure from Moore{\textquoteright}s law{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} that forces us to lower our expectations to compute ourselves out of this. In this paper, we address this situation by randomized dimensionality reduction, which we adapt from the field of compressive sensing. In this approach, we combine deliberate randomized subsampling with structure-exploiting transform-domain sparsity promotion. Our approach is successful because it reduces the size of seismic data volumes without loss of information. With this reduction, we compute Newton-like updates at the cost of roughly one gradient update for the fully-sampled wavefield.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Presentation, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3513022},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/li10SEGfwi/li10SEGfwi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/li10SEGfwi/li10SEGfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
