@article {witte2018alf,
	title = {A large-scale framework for symbolic implementations of seismic inversion algorithms in Julia},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {84},
	number = {3},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {03},
	pages = {F57-F71},
	abstract = {Writing software packages for seismic inversion is a very challenging task, since problems such as full-waveform inversion or least-squares imaging are both algorithmically and computationally demanding due to the large number of unknown parameters and the fact that we are propagating waves over many wavelengths. Software frameworks therefore need to combine both versatility and performance to provide geophysicists with the means and flexibility to implement complex algorithms that scale to exceedingly large 3D problems. Following these principles, we introduce the Julia Devito Inversion framework, an open-source software package in Julia for large-scale seismic modeling and inversion based on Devito, a domain-specific language compiler for automatic code generation. The framework consists of matrix-free linear operators for implementing seismic inversion algorithms that closely resembles the mathematical notation, a flexible resilient parallelization and an interface to Devito for generating optimized stencil code to solve the underlying wave equations. In comparison to many manually optimized industry codes written in low-level languages, our software is built on the idea of independent layers of abstractions and user interfaces with symbolic operators, making it possible to manage both the complexity of algorithms and performance optimizations, while preserving modularity, which allows for a level of expressiveness needed to formulate a broad range of wave-equation-based inversion problems. Through a series of numerical examples, we demonstrate that this allows users to implement algorithms for waveform inversion and imaging as simple Julia scripts that scale to large-scale 3D problems; thus providing a truly performant research and production framework.},
	keywords = {FWI, inversion, LSRTM, Modeling, software},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2018-0174.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2019/witte2018alf/witte2018alf.pdf},
	author = {Philipp A. Witte and Mathias Louboutin and Navjot Kukreja and Fabio Luporini and Michael Lange and Gerard J. Gorman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {louboutin2017fwip2,
	title = {Full-Waveform Inversion - Part 2: adjoint modeling},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {37},
	number = {1},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {1},
	pages = {69-72},
	abstract = {This tutorial is the second part of a three part tutorial series on full-waveform inversion (FWI), in which we provide a step by step walk through of setting up forward and adjoint wave equation solvers and an optimization framework for inversion. In part 1 (Louboutin et al., 2017), we demonstrated how to discretize the acoustic wave equation and how to set up a basic forward modeling scheme using Devito, a domain-specific language (DSL) in Python for automated finite-difference (FD) computations (Lange et al., 2016). Devito allows us to define wave equations as symbolic Python expressions (Meurer et al., 2017), from which optimized FD stencil code is automatically generated at run time. In part 1, we show how we can use Devito to set up and solve acoustic wave equations with (impulsive) seismic sources and sample wavefields at the receiver locations to model shot records.},
	keywords = {acoustic, devito, finite-difference, FWI, tutorial},
	doi = {10.1190/tle37010069.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2018/louboutin2017fwip2/louboutin2017fwip2.html},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Philipp A. Witte and Michael Lange and Navjot Kukreja and Fabio Luporini and Gerard Gorman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {witte2018fwip3,
	title = {Full-Waveform Inversion - Part 3: optimization},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {37},
	number = {2},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {1},
	pages = {142-145},
	abstract = {This tutorial is the third part of a full-waveform inversion (FWI) tutorial series with a step-by-step walkthrough of setting up forward and adjoint wave equations and building a basic FWI inversion framework. For discretizing and solving wave equations, we use Devito, a Python-based domain-specific language for automated generation of finite-difference code (Lange et al., 2016). The first two parts of this tutorial (Louboutin et al., 2017, 2018) demonstrated how to solve the acoustic wave equation for modeling seismic shot records and how to compute the gradient of the FWI objective function using the adjoint-state method. With these two key ingredients, we will now build an inversion framework that can be used to minimize the FWI least-squares objective function.},
	keywords = {devito, finite-differences, FWI, inversion, Modeling, tutorial},
	doi = {10.1190/tle37020142.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2018/witte2018fwip3/witte2018fwip3.html},
	author = {Philipp A. Witte and Mathias Louboutin and Keegan Lensink and Michael Lange and Navjot Kukreja and Fabio Luporini and Gerard Gorman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {louboutin2017fwi,
	title = {Full-Waveform Inversion - Part 1: forward modeling},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {36},
	number = {12},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {12},
	pages = {1033-1036},
	abstract = {Since its re-introduction by Pratt (1999), full-waveform inversion (FWI) has gained a lot of attention in geophysical exploration because of its ability to build high resolution velocity models more or less automatically in areas of complex geology. While there is an extensive and growing literature on the topic, publications focus mostly on technical aspects, making this topic inaccessible for a broader audience due to the lack of simple introductory resources for newcomers to geophysics. We will accomplish this by providing a hands-on walkthrough of FWI using Devito (Lange et al. 2016), a system based on domain-specific languages that automatically generates code for time-domainfinite-differences.},
	keywords = {devito, finite-differences, FWI, Modeling, tutorial},
	doi = {10.1190/tle36121033.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2017/louboutin2017fwi/louboutin2017fwi.html},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Philipp A. Witte and Michael Lange and Navjot Kukreja and Fabio Luporini and Gerard Gorman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
