@article {oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl,
	title = {Low-cost time-lapse seismic with distributed compressive sensing{\textendash}-Part 1: exploiting common information among the vintages},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {82},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {P1-P13},
	abstract = {Time-lapse seismic is a powerful technology for monitoring a variety of subsurface changes due to reservoir fluid flow. However, the practice can be technically challenging when one seeks to acquire colocated time-lapse surveys with high degrees of replicability among the shot locations. We have determined that under "ideal" circumstances, in which we ignore errors related to taking measurements off the grid, high-quality prestack data can be obtained from randomized subsampled measurements that are observed from surveys in which we choose not to revisit the same randomly subsampled on-the-grid shot locations. Our acquisition is low cost because our measurements are subsampled. We have found that the recovered finely sampled prestack baseline and monitor data actually improve significantly when the same on-the-grid shot locations are not revisited. We achieve this result by using the fact that different time-lapse data share information and that nonreplicated (on-the-grid) acquisitions can add information when prestack data are recovered jointly. Whenever the time-lapse data exhibit joint structure{\textendash}-i.e., they are compressible in some transform domain and share information{\textendash}-sparsity-promoting recovery of the "common component" and "innovations," with respect to this common component, outperforms independent recovery of the prestack baseline and monitor data. The recovered time-lapse data are of high enough quality to serve as the input to extract poststack attributes used to compute time-lapse differences. Without joint recovery, artifacts{\textendash}-due to the randomized subsampling{\textendash}-lead to deterioration of the degree of repeatability of the time-lapse data. We tested this method by carrying out experiments with reliable statistics from thousands of repeated experiments. We also confirmed that high degrees of repeatability are achievable for an ocean-bottom cable survey acquired with time-jittered continuous recording.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, joint recovery method, marine, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2016-0076.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2017/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl.html},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {wason2016GEOPctl,
	title = {Low-cost time-lapse seismic with distributed compressive sensing{\textendash}-Part 2: impact on repeatability},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {82},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {P15-P30},
	abstract = {Irregular or off-the-grid spatial sampling of sources and receivers is inevitable in field seismic acquisitions. Consequently, time-lapse surveys become particularly expensive since current practices aim to replicate densely sampled surveys for monitoring changes occurring in the reservoir due to hydrocarbon production. We demonstrate that under certain circumstances, high-quality prestack data can be obtained from cheap randomized subsampled measurements that are observed from nonreplicated surveys. We extend our time-jittered marine acquisition to time-lapse surveys by designing acquisition on irregular spatial grids that render simultaneous, subsampled and irregular measurements. Using the fact that different time-lapse data share information and that nonreplicated surveys add information when prestack data are recovered jointly, we recover periodic densely sampled and colocated prestack data by adapting the recovery method to incorporate a regularization operator that maps traces from an irregular spatial grid to a regular periodic grid. The recovery method is, therefore, a combined operation of regularization, interpolation (estimating missing fine-grid traces from subsampled coarse-grid data), and source separation (unraveling overlapping shot records). By relaxing the insistence on replicability between surveys, we find that recovery of the time-lapse difference shows little variability for realistic field scenarios of slightly nonreplicated surveys that suffer from unavoidable natural deviations in spatial sampling of shots (or receivers) and pragmatic compressed-sensing based nonreplicated surveys when compared to the "ideal" scenario of exact replicability between surveys. Moreover, the recovered densely sampled prestack baseline and monitor data improve significantly when the acquisitions are not replicated, and hence can serve as input to extract poststack attributes used to compute time-lapse differences. Our observations are based on experiments conducted for an ocean-bottom cable survey acquired with time-jittered continuous recording assuming source equalization (or same source signature) for the time-lapse surveys and no changes in wave heights, water column velocities or temperature and salinity profiles, etc.},
	keywords = {joint recovery method, Marine acquisition, off-the-grid recovery, Optimization, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2016-0252.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2017/wason2016GEOPctl/wason2016GEOPctl.html},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {wason2016SINBADFlcr,
	title = {Low-cost, randomized 3D towed-marine time-lapse seismic acquisition},
	year = {2016},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Most often conventional 3D towed-marine seismic data acquisition suffers from limited illumination of subsurface due to narrow azimuth. Although, acquisition techniques such as Ocean Bottom Cable (OBC), Ocean Bottom Node (OBN), Rich-Azimuth (RAZ) acquisition, Multi-Azimuth (MAZ) acquisition have been developed to illuminate the subsurface from all possible angles, these acquisition techniques are expensive. Motivated by the design principles of compressed sensing, we acquire randomly subsampled and simultaneous (e.g., simultaneous long offset) 3D towed-marine time-lapse seismic data for few (random) azimuths, and recover densely sampled multiple azimuth baseline and monitor data via sparsity promotion and rank minimization. Our acquisition is low cost since we have subsampled measurements.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2016, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/wason2016SINBADFlcr/wason2016SINBADFlcr.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/wason2016SINBADFlcr/marine_acq_mask.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {wason2015SINBADldr,
	title = {Latest developments in randomized marine acquisition and source separation},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present the latest developments in randomized (simultaneous) marine acquisition for time-lapse surveys. We also show a comparison between two source separation algorithms {\textemdash} sparsity-promotion and rank-minimization {\textemdash} for simultaneous data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/wason2015SINBADldr/wason2015SINBADldr.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {li2013SINBADgom,
	title = {Lessons learned from Chevron Gulf of Mexico data set},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Chevron Gulf of Mexico data set is very challenging for FWI because of elastic phases, limited offset, lack of low frequencies and salt structure. To overcome these issue, we first use ray-based tomography on the hand-picked first breaks to generate initial model for FWI, and then we apply curvelet-denosing techniques to improve the poor signal-to-noise ratio of the observed data at low frequencies. Finally, Curvelet domain sparsity promoting Gauss-Newton FWI helps to suppress model space artifacts caused by elastic phases. This is joint work with Andrew J. Calvert, Ian Hanlon, Mostafa Javanmehri, Rajiv Kumar, Tristan van Leeuwen, Brendan R. Smithyman, Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/li2013SINBADgom/li2013SINBADgom.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Brendan R. Smithyman and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
