@conference {oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse seismic data processing using shared information},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(CSEG, Calgary)},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Time-lapse images void of acquisition and processing artifacts can provide more useful information about subsurface changes compared to those with acquisition footprints and other unwanted anomalies. Although, several pre-processing techniques are being developed and used to mitigate these unwanted artifacts, these operations can be very expensive, challenging and data dependent. Migration, as a processing tool, using a sparsity constraint has been shown to reduce artifacts drastically but little is known about the significance for compressed time-lapse seismic data. Leveraging ideas from distributed compressed sensing, and motivated by our earlier work on recovery of densely sampled time-lapse data from compressively sampled measurements, we present a sparsity-constrained migration for time-lapse data that uses a common component shared by the baseline and monitor data. Our algorithm tested on a synthetic example highlights the advantages of exploiting the common information, compared to ad hoc methods that involve parallel processing of the time-lapse data before differencing.},
	keywords = {CSEG, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2015/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2015/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld,
	title = {Assessing the need for repeatability in acquisition of time-lapse data},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {There are several factors that affect the repeatability of 4D(time-lapse) seismic data. One of the most significant factors is the repeatability of the acquisition, particularly the locations of the sources and receivers. It is important to repeat the source-receiver locations, used during the baseline survey, in the monitor or repeat survey. Also, it is essential that the stacked data volumes used for time-lapse analysis are created using the same offset ranges for each survey. This condition is crucial in order to be able to produce an image of the same location over a period of time and enhances proper reservoir characterization. The cost of repeating the seismic acquisition is very expensive, as often times, the receiver array has to be left at the same location over the period for which the data will be acquired. In other words, it is important to repeat the acquisition geometry as much as possible. In this talk, we investigate the results of changing the acquisition geometry, by a random placement of the receivers for both the baseline surveys and newer (monitor) surveys. Results show that we are still able to observe any time-lapse effects from the proposed acquisition geometry. Our experiments have been performed on a synthetic model.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, CSEG, migration, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2013/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2013/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
