@conference {oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl,
	title = {Improved time-lapse data repeatability with randomized sampling and distributed compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(EAGE, Paris)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Recently, new ideas on randomized sampling for time-lapse seismic acquisition have been proposed to address some of the challenges of replicating time-lapse surveys. These ideas, which stem from distributed compressed sensing (DCS) led to the birth of a joint recovery model (JRM) for processing time-lapse data (noise-free) acquired from non-replicated acquisition geometries. However, when the earth does not change{\textendash}-i.e. no time-lapse{\textemdash}the recovered vintages from two non-replicated surveys should show high repeatability measured in terms of normalized RMS, which is a standard metric for quantifying time-lapse data repeatability. Under this assumption of no time-lapse change, we demonstrate improved repeatability (with JRM) of the recovered data from non-replicated random samplings, first with noisy data and secondly in situations where there are calibration errors i.e. where the acquisition parameters such as source/receiver coordinates are not precise.},
	keywords = {calibration, Compressive Sensing, EAGE, noise, repeatability, time lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201701389},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2017/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2017/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl_poster.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2015EAGEcsm,
	title = {Compressed sensing in 4-D marine{\textendash}-recovery of dense time-lapse data from subsampled data without repetition},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered marine acquisition for time-lapse surveys by working on more realistic field acquisition scenarios by incorporating irregular spatial grids without insisting on repeatability between the surveys. Since we are always subsampled in both the baseline and monitor surveys, we are interested in recovering the densely sampled baseline and monitor, and then the (complete) 4-D difference from subsampled/incomplete baseline and monitor data.},
	keywords = {EAGE, NFFT, off-the-grid, simultaneous acquisition, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413088},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/wason2015EAGEcsm/wason2015EAGEcsm.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/wason2015EAGEcsm/wason2015EAGEcsm_poster.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci,
	title = {Using common information in compressive time-lapse full-waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {The use of time-lapse seismic data to monitor changes in the subsurface has become standard practice in industry. In addition, full-waveform inversion has also been extended to time-lapse seismic to obtain useful time-lapse information. The computational cost of this method are becoming more pronounced as the volume of data increases. Therefore, it is necessary to develop fast inversion algorithms that can also give improved time-lapse results. Rather than following existing joint inversion algorithms, we are motivated by a joint recovery model which exploits the common information among the baseline and monitor data. We propose a joint inversion framework, leveraging ideas from distributed compressive sensing and the modified Gauss-Newton method for full-waveform inversion, by using the shared information in the time-lapse data. Our results on a realistic synthetic example highlight the benefits of our joint inversion approach over a parallel inversion method that does not exploit the shared information. Preliminary results also indicate that our formulation can address time-lapse data with inconsistent acquisition geometries.},
	keywords = {EAGE, FWI, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413086},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci_poster.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014EAGEWSrrt,
	title = {Randomization and repeatability in time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {EAGE Workshop on Land and Ocean Bottom; Broadband Full Azimuth Seismic Surveys; Spain},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(EAGE Workshop, Spain)},
	month = {04},
	keywords = {4D seismic, EAGE, Marine acquisition, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/herrmann2014EAGEWSrrt.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls,
	title = {Time-lapse seismic without repetition: reaping the benefits from randomized sampling and joint recovery},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In the current paradigm of 4-D seismic, guaranteeing repeatability in acquisition and processing of the baseline and monitor surveys ranks highest amongst the technical challenges one faces in detecting time-lapse signals. By using recent insights from the field of compressive sensing, we show that the condition of survey repeatability can be relaxed as long as we carry out a sparsitypromoting program that exploits shared information between the baseline and monitor surveys. By inverting for the baseline and monitor survey as the common "background", we are able to compute high-fidelity 4-D differences from carefully selected synthetic surveys that have different sets of source/receivers missing. This synthetic example is proof of concept of an exciting new approach to randomized 4-D acquisition where time-lapse signal can be computed as long as the survey details, such as source/receiver locations are known afterwards.},
	keywords = {4-D seismic, EAGE, joint recovery, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20141478},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
