@mastersthesis {oghenekohwo2017THetl,
	title = {Economic time-lapse seismic acquisition and imaging{\textendash}-Reaping the benefits of randomized sampling with distributed compressive sensing},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(PhD)},
	month = {08},
	school = {The University of British Columbia},
	type = {phd},
	address = {Vancouver},
	abstract = {This thesis presents a novel viewpoint on the implicit opportunities randomized surveys bring to time-lapse seismic - which is a proven surveillance tool for hydrocarbon reservoir monitoring. Time-lapse (4D) seismic combines acquisition and processing of at least two seismic datasets (or vintages) in order to extract information related to changes in a reservoir within a specified time interval. The current paradigm places stringent requirements on replicating the 4D surveys, which is an expensive task often requiring uneconomical dense sampling of seismic wavefields. To mitigate the challenges of dense sampling, several advances in seismic acquisition have been made in recent years including the use of multiple sources firing at near simultaneous random times, and the adaptation of Compressive Sensing (CS) principles to design practical acquisition engines that improve sampling efficiency for seismic data acquisition. However, little is known regarding the implications of these developments for time-lapse studies. By conducting multiple experiments modelling surveys adhering to the principles of CS for 4D seismic, I propose a model that demonstrates the feasibility of randomized acquisitions for time-lapse seismic. The proposed joint recovery model (JRM), which derives from distributed CS, exploits the common information in time-lapse data during recovery of dense wavefields from measured subsampled data, providing highly repeatable and high-fidelity vintages. I show that we obtain better vintages when randomized surveys are not replicated, in contrast to standard practice, paving the way for an opportunity to relax the rigorous requirement to replicate surveys precisely. We assert that the vintages obtained using our proposed model are of sufficient quality to serve as inputs to processes that extract time-lapse attributes from which subsurface changes are deduced. Additionally, I show that recovery with the JRM is robust with respect to errors due to differences between actual and recorded postplot information. Finally, I present an opportunity to adapt our model to problems related to time-lapse seismic imaging where the main finding is that we can better delineate time-lapse changes by adapting the joint recovery model to wave-equation based inversion methods.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, Compressive Sensing, distributed compressive sensing, joint recovery, PhD, thesis, time lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2017/oghenekohwo2017THetl/oghenekohwo2017THetl.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2017/oghenekohwo2017THetl/oghenekohwo2017THetl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo}
}
@article {oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl,
	title = {Low-cost time-lapse seismic with distributed compressive sensing{\textendash}-Part 1: exploiting common information among the vintages},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {82},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {P1-P13},
	abstract = {Time-lapse seismic is a powerful technology for monitoring a variety of subsurface changes due to reservoir fluid flow. However, the practice can be technically challenging when one seeks to acquire colocated time-lapse surveys with high degrees of replicability among the shot locations. We have determined that under "ideal" circumstances, in which we ignore errors related to taking measurements off the grid, high-quality prestack data can be obtained from randomized subsampled measurements that are observed from surveys in which we choose not to revisit the same randomly subsampled on-the-grid shot locations. Our acquisition is low cost because our measurements are subsampled. We have found that the recovered finely sampled prestack baseline and monitor data actually improve significantly when the same on-the-grid shot locations are not revisited. We achieve this result by using the fact that different time-lapse data share information and that nonreplicated (on-the-grid) acquisitions can add information when prestack data are recovered jointly. Whenever the time-lapse data exhibit joint structure{\textendash}-i.e., they are compressible in some transform domain and share information{\textendash}-sparsity-promoting recovery of the "common component" and "innovations," with respect to this common component, outperforms independent recovery of the prestack baseline and monitor data. The recovered time-lapse data are of high enough quality to serve as the input to extract poststack attributes used to compute time-lapse differences. Without joint recovery, artifacts{\textendash}-due to the randomized subsampling{\textendash}-lead to deterioration of the degree of repeatability of the time-lapse data. We tested this method by carrying out experiments with reliable statistics from thousands of repeated experiments. We also confirmed that high degrees of repeatability are achievable for an ocean-bottom cable survey acquired with time-jittered continuous recording.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, joint recovery method, marine, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2016-0076.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2017/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl.html},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2016SEGWSctl,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Low cost geophysics: How to be creative in a cost-challenged environment; Dallas},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {Acquisition, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/herrmann2016SEGWSctl/herrmann2016SEGWSctl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason}
}
@conference {wason2014SEGrrt,
	title = {Randomization and repeatability in time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {46-51},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered simultaneous marine acquisition to time-lapse surveys where the requirement for repeatability in acquisition can be waived provided we know the acquisition geometry afterwards. Our method, which does not require repetition, gives 4-D signals comparable to conventional methods where repeatability is key to their success.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, deblending, marine, SEG, time-laspe},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1677.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGrrt/wason2014SEGrrt.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGrrt/wason2014SEGrrt_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw,
	title = {Randomized sampling without repetition in time-lapse surveys},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {4848-4852},
	abstract = {Vouching for higher levels of repeatability in acquisition and processing of time-lapse (4D) seismic data has become the standard with oil and gas contractor companies, with significant investment in the design of acquisition systems and processing algorithms that attempt to address some of the current 4D challenges, in particular, imaging weak 4D signals. Recent developments from the field of compressive sensing have shown the benefits of variants of randomized sampling in marine seismic acquisition and its impact for the future of seismic exploration. Following these developments, we show that the requirement for accurate survey repetition in time-lapse seismic data acquisition can be waived provided we solve a sparsity-promoting convex optimization program that makes use of the shared component between the baseline and monitor data. By setting up a framework for inversion of the stacked sections of a time-lapse data, given the pre-stack data volumes, we are able to extract 4D signals with relatively highfidelity from significant subsamplings. Our formulation is applied to time-lapse data that has been acquired with different source/receiver geometries, paving the way for an efficient approach to dealing with time-lapse data acquired with initially poor repeatability levels, provided the survey geometry details are known afterwards.},
	keywords = {4D, Acquisition, random, repetition, SEG, time-lapse},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1627.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld,
	title = {Assessing the need for repeatability in acquisition of time-lapse data},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {There are several factors that affect the repeatability of 4D(time-lapse) seismic data. One of the most significant factors is the repeatability of the acquisition, particularly the locations of the sources and receivers. It is important to repeat the source-receiver locations, used during the baseline survey, in the monitor or repeat survey. Also, it is essential that the stacked data volumes used for time-lapse analysis are created using the same offset ranges for each survey. This condition is crucial in order to be able to produce an image of the same location over a period of time and enhances proper reservoir characterization. The cost of repeating the seismic acquisition is very expensive, as often times, the receiver array has to be left at the same location over the period for which the data will be acquired. In other words, it is important to repeat the acquisition geometry as much as possible. In this talk, we investigate the results of changing the acquisition geometry, by a random placement of the receivers for both the baseline surveys and newer (monitor) surveys. Results show that we are still able to observe any time-lapse effects from the proposed acquisition geometry. Our experiments have been performed on a synthetic model.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, CSEG, migration, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2013/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2013/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {oghenekohwo2013SEGtlswrs,
	title = {Time-lapse seismics with randomized sampling},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2013-3},
	year = {2013},
	institution = {UBC},
	abstract = {In time-lapse or 4D seismics, repeatability of the acquisition is a very crucial step, as we do not want spurious events that are not there. In this paper, we propose an approach which avoids any requirement to repeat the surveys, by using randomized sampling technique which allows us to be more efficient in the acquisition. Our method applies to sampling data using ocean bottom nodes (OBN) as receivers. We test the efficacy of our proposed randomized acquisition geometry for time-lapse survey on two different models. In the first example, model properties does not change with time, while in the second example, model exhibit a time-lapse effect which may be caused by the migration of fluid within the reservoir. We perform two types of randomized sampling - uniform randomized sampling and jittered sampling to visualize the effects of non-repeatability in time-lapse survey. We observe that jittered randomized sampling is a more efficient method compared to randomized sampling, due to it{\textquoteright}s requirement to control the maximum spacing between the receivers. The results are presented, in the image space, as a least-squares migration of the model perturbation and they are shown for a subset of a synthetic model - the Marmousi model},
	keywords = {Acquisition, migration, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2013/oghenekohwo2013SEGtlswrs/oghenekohwo2013SEGtlswrs.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
