@mastersthesis {oghenekohwo2017THetl,
	title = {Economic time-lapse seismic acquisition and imaging{\textendash}-Reaping the benefits of randomized sampling with distributed compressive sensing},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(PhD)},
	month = {08},
	school = {The University of British Columbia},
	type = {phd},
	address = {Vancouver},
	abstract = {This thesis presents a novel viewpoint on the implicit opportunities randomized surveys bring to time-lapse seismic - which is a proven surveillance tool for hydrocarbon reservoir monitoring. Time-lapse (4D) seismic combines acquisition and processing of at least two seismic datasets (or vintages) in order to extract information related to changes in a reservoir within a specified time interval. The current paradigm places stringent requirements on replicating the 4D surveys, which is an expensive task often requiring uneconomical dense sampling of seismic wavefields. To mitigate the challenges of dense sampling, several advances in seismic acquisition have been made in recent years including the use of multiple sources firing at near simultaneous random times, and the adaptation of Compressive Sensing (CS) principles to design practical acquisition engines that improve sampling efficiency for seismic data acquisition. However, little is known regarding the implications of these developments for time-lapse studies. By conducting multiple experiments modelling surveys adhering to the principles of CS for 4D seismic, I propose a model that demonstrates the feasibility of randomized acquisitions for time-lapse seismic. The proposed joint recovery model (JRM), which derives from distributed CS, exploits the common information in time-lapse data during recovery of dense wavefields from measured subsampled data, providing highly repeatable and high-fidelity vintages. I show that we obtain better vintages when randomized surveys are not replicated, in contrast to standard practice, paving the way for an opportunity to relax the rigorous requirement to replicate surveys precisely. We assert that the vintages obtained using our proposed model are of sufficient quality to serve as inputs to processes that extract time-lapse attributes from which subsurface changes are deduced. Additionally, I show that recovery with the JRM is robust with respect to errors due to differences between actual and recorded postplot information. Finally, I present an opportunity to adapt our model to problems related to time-lapse seismic imaging where the main finding is that we can better delineate time-lapse changes by adapting the joint recovery model to wave-equation based inversion methods.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, Compressive Sensing, distributed compressive sensing, joint recovery, PhD, thesis, time lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2017/oghenekohwo2017THetl/oghenekohwo2017THetl.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2017/oghenekohwo2017THetl/oghenekohwo2017THetl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo}
}
@presentation {herrmann2017SINBADFhrc,
	title = {Highly repeatable 3D compressive full-azimuth towed-streamer time-lapse acquisition {\textendash}- a numerical feasibility study at scale},
	year = {2017},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Most conventional 3D time-lapse (or 4D) acquisitions are ocean-bottom cable (OBC) or ocean-bottom node (OBN) surveys since these surveys are relatively easy to replicate compared to towed-streamer surveys. To attain high degrees of repeatability, survey replicability and dense periodic sampling has become the norm for 4D surveys that renders this technology expensive. Conventional towed-streamer acquisitions suffer from limited illumination of subsurface due to narrow azimuth. Although, acquisition techniques such as multi-azimuth, wide-azimuth, rich-azimuth acquisition, etc., have been developed to illuminate the subsurface from all possible angles, these techniques can be prohibitively expensive for densely sampled surveys. This leads to uneven sampling, i.e., dense receiver and coarse source sampling or vice-versa, in order to make these acquisitions more affordable. Motivated by the design principles of Compressive Sensing (CS), we acquire economic, randomly subsampled (or compressive) and simultaneous towed-streamer time-lapse data without the need of replicating the surveys. We recover densely sampled time-lapse data on one and the same periodic grid by using a joint-recovery model (JRM) that exploits shared information among different time-lapse recordings, coupled with a computationally cheap and scalable rank-minimization technique. The acquisition is low cost since we have subsampled measurements (about 70\% subsampled), simulated with a simultaneous long-offset acquisition configuration of two source vessels travelling across a survey area at random azimuths. We analyze the performance of our proposed compressive acquisition and subsequent recovery strategy by conducting a synthetic, at scale, seismic experiment on a 3D time-lapse model containing geological features such as channel systems, dipping and faulted beds, unconformities and a gas cloud. Our findings indicate that the insistence on replicability between surveys and the need for OBC/OBN 4D surveys can, perhaps, be relaxed. Moreover, this is a natural next step beyond the successful CS acquisition examples discussed during this session.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2017, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2017/Fall/herrmann2017SINBADFhrc/herrmann2017SINBADFhrc.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2017/Fall/herrmann2017SINBADFhrc/herrmann2017SINBADFhrc.mov},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Shashin Sharan and Felix Oghenekohwo}
}
@article {oghenekohwo2017hrt,
	title = {Highly repeatable time-lapse seismic with distributed Compressive Sensing{\textendash}-mitigating effects of calibration errors},
	journal = {The Leading Edge},
	volume = {36},
	number = {8},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(The Leading Edge)},
	month = {08},
	pages = {688-694},
	abstract = {Recently, we demonstrated that combining joint recovery with low-cost non-replicated randomized sampling tailored to time-lapse seismic can give us access to high fidelity, highly repeatable, dense prestack vintages, and high-grade time-lapse. To arrive at this result, we assumed well-calibrated surveys{\textendash}-i.e., we presumed accurate post-plot source/receiver positions. Unfortunately, in practice seismic surveys are prone to calibration errors, which are unknown deviations between actual and post-plot acquisition geometry. By means of synthetic experiments, we analyze the possible impact of these errors on vintages and on time-lapse data obtained with our joint recovery model from compressively sampled surveys. Supported by these experiments, we demonstrate that highly repeatable time-lapse vintages are attainable despite the presence of unknown calibration errors in the positions of the shots. We assess the repeatability quantitatively for two scenarios by studying the impact of calibration errors on conventional dense but irregularly sampled surveys and on low-cost compressed surveys. To separate time-lapse effects from calibration issues, we consider the idealized case where the subsurface remains unchanged and the practical situation where time-lapse changes are restricted to a subset of the data. In both cases, the quality of the recovered vintages and time-lapse decreases gracefully for low-cost compressed surveys with increasing calibration errors. Conversely, the quality of vintages from expensive densely periodically sampled surveys decreases more rapidly as unknown and difficult to control calibration errors increase.},
	keywords = {calibration errors, joint-recovery method, marine, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/tle36080688.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/TheLeadingEdge/2017/oghenekohwo2017hrt/oghenekohwo2017hrt.html},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl,
	title = {Improved time-lapse data repeatability with randomized sampling and distributed compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(EAGE, Paris)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Recently, new ideas on randomized sampling for time-lapse seismic acquisition have been proposed to address some of the challenges of replicating time-lapse surveys. These ideas, which stem from distributed compressed sensing (DCS) led to the birth of a joint recovery model (JRM) for processing time-lapse data (noise-free) acquired from non-replicated acquisition geometries. However, when the earth does not change{\textendash}-i.e. no time-lapse{\textemdash}the recovered vintages from two non-replicated surveys should show high repeatability measured in terms of normalized RMS, which is a standard metric for quantifying time-lapse data repeatability. Under this assumption of no time-lapse change, we demonstrate improved repeatability (with JRM) of the recovered data from non-replicated random samplings, first with noisy data and secondly in situations where there are calibration errors i.e. where the acquisition parameters such as source/receiver coordinates are not precise.},
	keywords = {calibration, Compressive Sensing, EAGE, noise, repeatability, time lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201701389},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2017/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2017/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl/oghenekohwo2017EAGEitl_poster.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl,
	title = {Low-cost time-lapse seismic with distributed compressive sensing{\textendash}-Part 1: exploiting common information among the vintages},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {82},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {P1-P13},
	abstract = {Time-lapse seismic is a powerful technology for monitoring a variety of subsurface changes due to reservoir fluid flow. However, the practice can be technically challenging when one seeks to acquire colocated time-lapse surveys with high degrees of replicability among the shot locations. We have determined that under "ideal" circumstances, in which we ignore errors related to taking measurements off the grid, high-quality prestack data can be obtained from randomized subsampled measurements that are observed from surveys in which we choose not to revisit the same randomly subsampled on-the-grid shot locations. Our acquisition is low cost because our measurements are subsampled. We have found that the recovered finely sampled prestack baseline and monitor data actually improve significantly when the same on-the-grid shot locations are not revisited. We achieve this result by using the fact that different time-lapse data share information and that nonreplicated (on-the-grid) acquisitions can add information when prestack data are recovered jointly. Whenever the time-lapse data exhibit joint structure{\textendash}-i.e., they are compressible in some transform domain and share information{\textendash}-sparsity-promoting recovery of the "common component" and "innovations," with respect to this common component, outperforms independent recovery of the prestack baseline and monitor data. The recovered time-lapse data are of high enough quality to serve as the input to extract poststack attributes used to compute time-lapse differences. Without joint recovery, artifacts{\textendash}-due to the randomized subsampling{\textendash}-lead to deterioration of the degree of repeatability of the time-lapse data. We tested this method by carrying out experiments with reliable statistics from thousands of repeated experiments. We also confirmed that high degrees of repeatability are achievable for an ocean-bottom cable survey acquired with time-jittered continuous recording.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, joint recovery method, marine, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2016-0076.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2017/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl/oghenekohwo2016GEOPctl.html},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {wason2016GEOPctl,
	title = {Low-cost time-lapse seismic with distributed compressive sensing{\textendash}-Part 2: impact on repeatability},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {82},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysics)},
	month = {05},
	pages = {P15-P30},
	abstract = {Irregular or off-the-grid spatial sampling of sources and receivers is inevitable in field seismic acquisitions. Consequently, time-lapse surveys become particularly expensive since current practices aim to replicate densely sampled surveys for monitoring changes occurring in the reservoir due to hydrocarbon production. We demonstrate that under certain circumstances, high-quality prestack data can be obtained from cheap randomized subsampled measurements that are observed from nonreplicated surveys. We extend our time-jittered marine acquisition to time-lapse surveys by designing acquisition on irregular spatial grids that render simultaneous, subsampled and irregular measurements. Using the fact that different time-lapse data share information and that nonreplicated surveys add information when prestack data are recovered jointly, we recover periodic densely sampled and colocated prestack data by adapting the recovery method to incorporate a regularization operator that maps traces from an irregular spatial grid to a regular periodic grid. The recovery method is, therefore, a combined operation of regularization, interpolation (estimating missing fine-grid traces from subsampled coarse-grid data), and source separation (unraveling overlapping shot records). By relaxing the insistence on replicability between surveys, we find that recovery of the time-lapse difference shows little variability for realistic field scenarios of slightly nonreplicated surveys that suffer from unavoidable natural deviations in spatial sampling of shots (or receivers) and pragmatic compressed-sensing based nonreplicated surveys when compared to the "ideal" scenario of exact replicability between surveys. Moreover, the recovered densely sampled prestack baseline and monitor data improve significantly when the acquisitions are not replicated, and hence can serve as input to extract poststack attributes used to compute time-lapse differences. Our observations are based on experiments conducted for an ocean-bottom cable survey acquired with time-jittered continuous recording assuming source equalization (or same source signature) for the time-lapse surveys and no changes in wave heights, water column velocities or temperature and salinity profiles, etc.},
	keywords = {joint recovery method, Marine acquisition, off-the-grid recovery, Optimization, random sampling, time-lapse seismic},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2016-0252.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2017/wason2016GEOPctl/wason2016GEOPctl.html},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2016SINBADFast,
	title = {Asymmetric sampling for time-lapse surveys},
	year = {2016},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In this talk, we use the joint recovery model (JRM), which derives from distributed compressed sensing, to reconstruct time-lapse data acquired via time-jittered marine sources that are significantly subsampled in the monitor survey(s) in comparison to the baseline survey, hence, saving acquisition cost. We analyze the effects of two or more asymmetrically subsampled monitor surveys on wavefield reconstruction via JRM. We leverage the common information shared amongst the vintages during our sparsity-promoting recovery.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2016, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/oghenekohwo2016SINBADFast/oghenekohwo2016SINBADFast.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/oghenekohwo2016SINBADFast/oghenekohwo2016SINBADFast.mov},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2016SEGWSctl,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Low cost geophysics: How to be creative in a cost-challenged environment; Dallas},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {Acquisition, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/herrmann2016SEGWSctl/herrmann2016SEGWSctl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason}
}
@presentation {wason2016SINBADFlcr,
	title = {Low-cost, randomized 3D towed-marine time-lapse seismic acquisition},
	year = {2016},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Most often conventional 3D towed-marine seismic data acquisition suffers from limited illumination of subsurface due to narrow azimuth. Although, acquisition techniques such as Ocean Bottom Cable (OBC), Ocean Bottom Node (OBN), Rich-Azimuth (RAZ) acquisition, Multi-Azimuth (MAZ) acquisition have been developed to illuminate the subsurface from all possible angles, these acquisition techniques are expensive. Motivated by the design principles of compressed sensing, we acquire randomly subsampled and simultaneous (e.g., simultaneous long offset) 3D towed-marine time-lapse seismic data for few (random) azimuths, and recover densely sampled multiple azimuth baseline and monitor data via sparsity promotion and rank minimization. Our acquisition is low cost since we have subsampled measurements.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2016, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/wason2016SINBADFlcr/wason2016SINBADFlcr.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2016/Fall/wason2016SINBADFlcr/marine_acq_mask.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Shashin Sharan and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2015SINBADFcst,
	title = {Comparative study of time-lapse FWI approaches},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {I will illustrate the performance of our joint recovery model for time-lapse FWI. Specifically, I will compare our method to other conventional methods, namely, parallel difference and sequential difference FWI. I will illustrate the robustness of our method compared to others especially in the presence of missing data caused by large acquisition gaps. In addition, I will assess the performance of these methods in the detectability of the time-lapse change in synthetic data. Analysis of these methods under different starting FWI model will also be highlighted.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFcst/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFcst.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFcst/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFcst.mov},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2015EAGEcsm,
	title = {Compressed sensing in 4-D marine{\textendash}-recovery of dense time-lapse data from subsampled data without repetition},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered marine acquisition for time-lapse surveys by working on more realistic field acquisition scenarios by incorporating irregular spatial grids without insisting on repeatability between the surveys. Since we are always subsampled in both the baseline and monitor surveys, we are interested in recovering the densely sampled baseline and monitor, and then the (complete) 4-D difference from subsampled/incomplete baseline and monitor data.},
	keywords = {EAGE, NFFT, off-the-grid, simultaneous acquisition, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413088},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/wason2015EAGEcsm/wason2015EAGEcsm.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/wason2015EAGEcsm/wason2015EAGEcsm_poster.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl,
	title = {Compressive time-lapse seismic data processing using shared information},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(CSEG, Calgary)},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Time-lapse images void of acquisition and processing artifacts can provide more useful information about subsurface changes compared to those with acquisition footprints and other unwanted anomalies. Although, several pre-processing techniques are being developed and used to mitigate these unwanted artifacts, these operations can be very expensive, challenging and data dependent. Migration, as a processing tool, using a sparsity constraint has been shown to reduce artifacts drastically but little is known about the significance for compressed time-lapse seismic data. Leveraging ideas from distributed compressed sensing, and motivated by our earlier work on recovery of densely sampled time-lapse data from compressively sampled measurements, we present a sparsity-constrained migration for time-lapse data that uses a common component shared by the baseline and monitor data. Our algorithm tested on a synthetic example highlights the advantages of exploiting the common information, compared to ad hoc methods that involve parallel processing of the time-lapse data before differencing.},
	keywords = {CSEG, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2015/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2015/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl/oghenekohwo2015CSEGctl_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {wason2015SINBADldr,
	title = {Latest developments in randomized marine acquisition and source separation},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present the latest developments in randomized (simultaneous) marine acquisition for time-lapse surveys. We also show a comparison between two source separation algorithms {\textemdash} sparsity-promotion and rank-minimization {\textemdash} for simultaneous data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/wason2015SINBADldr/wason2015SINBADldr.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Rajiv Kumar and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2015PIMSntc,
	title = {A new take on compressive time-lapse seismic acquisition, imaging and inversion},
	booktitle = {PIMS Workshop on Advances in Seismic Imaging and Inversion},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(PIMS Workshop on Advances in Seismic Imaging and Inversion, University of Alberta, Edmonton)},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Compressive sensing (CS), a sampling paradigm that is changing how data is acquired and processed in many fields, has attracted tremendous attention in recent years. In exploration seismology, particularly in 3D seismic technology, there have been published work on the application of CS to seismic data acquisition, processing and inversion. However, very little is known about the implications of CS in time-lapse (4D) seismic. Leveraging ideas from distributed CS where more than one signal is acquired and processed, as in 4D seismic, we present a joint recovery algorithm for time-lapse seismic data acquisition, imaging and inversion. The algorithm exploits the common information in the data sets (baseline and monitor) as part of an inversion procedure. Application of our algorithm to realistic synthetic examples highlight its advantages over other conventional approaches for processing time-lapse seismic data.},
	keywords = {PIMS, time-lapse, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/PIMS/2015/oghenekohwo2015PIMSntc/oghenekohwo2015PIMSntc_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {wason2015SINBADFrtl,
	title = {Randomization of time-lapse marine surveys},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered (simultaneous) marine acquisition for time-lapse surveys, where we work on more realistic field acquisition scenarios by incorporating irregular spatial grids without insisting on repeatability between the surveys. Since we are always subsampled in both the baseline and monitor surveys, we recover the densely sampled baseline and monitor and then the (complete) 4-D difference from subsampled baseline and monitor data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/wason2015SINBADFrtl/wason2015SINBADFrtl.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/wason2015SINBADFrtl/wason2015SINBADFrtl.mov},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2015SINBADrdc,
	title = {Recent developments in compressive sensing for time-lapse studies},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present an overview of the advances we have made with respect to extending compressive sensing ideas to time-lapse studies. We show applications in compressive time-lapse seismic data acquisition, imaging and full-waveform inversion.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/oghenekohwo2015SINBADrdc/oghenekohwo2015SINBADrdc.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Ning Tu and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2015IIPFWItlf,
	title = {Time-lapse FWI with distributed compressed sensing},
	booktitle = {Inaugural Full-Waveform Inversion Workshop},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Natal, Brazil)},
	month = {08-09},
	abstract = {In this talk, I will discuss our most recent application of full-waveform inversion (FWI) to time-lapse seismic data inversion. Specifically, I will illustrate how a joint recovery model (JRM) can be used in a joint inversion framework, leveraging ideas from distributed compressed sensing (DCS). The key idea involves exploiting the common information in the baseline and monitor gradients during the inversion.},
	keywords = {distributed compressed sensing, FWI, time lapse},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IIPFWI/oghenekohwo2015IIPFWItlf/oghenekohwo2015IIPFWItlf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2015SINBADFtli,
	title = {Time-lapse imaging with multiples and distributed compressed sensing},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In this talk, we leverage our joint-recovery model, which uses the fact that time-lapse images generally have a lot in common, to improve imaging problems with large gaps. We demonstrate that the adverse effects of large acquisition gaps can be mitigated by using this joint-recovery model especially in combination with imaging with surface-related multiples.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFtli/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFtli.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFtli/oghenekohwo2015SINBADFtli.mov},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci,
	title = {Using common information in compressive time-lapse full-waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {The use of time-lapse seismic data to monitor changes in the subsurface has become standard practice in industry. In addition, full-waveform inversion has also been extended to time-lapse seismic to obtain useful time-lapse information. The computational cost of this method are becoming more pronounced as the volume of data increases. Therefore, it is necessary to develop fast inversion algorithms that can also give improved time-lapse results. Rather than following existing joint inversion algorithms, we are motivated by a joint recovery model which exploits the common information among the baseline and monitor data. We propose a joint inversion framework, leveraging ideas from distributed compressive sensing and the modified Gauss-Newton method for full-waveform inversion, by using the shared information in the time-lapse data. Our results on a realistic synthetic example highlight the benefits of our joint inversion approach over a parallel inversion method that does not exploit the shared information. Preliminary results also indicate that our formulation can address time-lapse data with inconsistent acquisition geometries.},
	keywords = {EAGE, FWI, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413086},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci/oghenekohwo2015EAGEuci_poster.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {wason2014SINBADrrt,
	title = {Randomization and repeatability in time-lapse marine acquisition},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {During this talk, we will show how randomization techniques from (distributed) compressed sensing affect the way we think about time-lapse surveys.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/wason2014SINBADrrt/wason2014SINBADrrt.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014EAGEWSrrt,
	title = {Randomization and repeatability in time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {EAGE Workshop on Land and Ocean Bottom; Broadband Full Azimuth Seismic Surveys; Spain},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(EAGE Workshop, Spain)},
	month = {04},
	keywords = {4D seismic, EAGE, Marine acquisition, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/herrmann2014EAGEWSrrt.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {wason2014SEGrrt,
	title = {Randomization and repeatability in time-lapse marine acquisition},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {46-51},
	abstract = {We present an extension of our time-jittered simultaneous marine acquisition to time-lapse surveys where the requirement for repeatability in acquisition can be waived provided we know the acquisition geometry afterwards. Our method, which does not require repetition, gives 4-D signals comparable to conventional methods where repeatability is key to their success.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, deblending, marine, SEG, time-laspe},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1677.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGrrt/wason2014SEGrrt.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/wason2014SEGrrt/wason2014SEGrrt_pres.pdf},
	author = {Haneet Wason and Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2014SINBADrsw,
	title = {Randomized sampling without repetition in time-lapse seismic surveys},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In this talk, we will show a method for acquiring time-lapse data, where we do not have to repeat the survey geometry. Our method works provided our acquisition is randomized, where sources and receivers are at random locations on a computational grid, and provided we know the spatial locations of the shots and receivers. In addition, we show the implications of either (sub)sampling more for the baseline and less for the monitor or vice-versa, and how this sampling scheme affects the 4-D signal.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Spring/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrsw/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrsw.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw,
	title = {Randomized sampling without repetition in time-lapse surveys},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {4848-4852},
	abstract = {Vouching for higher levels of repeatability in acquisition and processing of time-lapse (4D) seismic data has become the standard with oil and gas contractor companies, with significant investment in the design of acquisition systems and processing algorithms that attempt to address some of the current 4D challenges, in particular, imaging weak 4D signals. Recent developments from the field of compressive sensing have shown the benefits of variants of randomized sampling in marine seismic acquisition and its impact for the future of seismic exploration. Following these developments, we show that the requirement for accurate survey repetition in time-lapse seismic data acquisition can be waived provided we solve a sparsity-promoting convex optimization program that makes use of the shared component between the baseline and monitor data. By setting up a framework for inversion of the stacked sections of a time-lapse data, given the pre-stack data volumes, we are able to extract 4D signals with relatively highfidelity from significant subsamplings. Our formulation is applied to time-lapse data that has been acquired with different source/receiver geometries, paving the way for an efficient approach to dealing with time-lapse data acquired with initially poor repeatability levels, provided the survey geometry details are known afterwards.},
	keywords = {4D, Acquisition, random, repetition, SEG, time-lapse},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-1627.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw/oghenekohwo2014SEGrsw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2014SINBADrst,
	title = {Randomized subsampling in time-lapse surveys and recovery techniques},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {This talk centres on new insights on how we think of acquisition of time-lapse data using ideas from compressed sensing. Specifically, we will show how simultaneous processing of time-lapse data from randomized subsampling gives more reliable estimates of the vintages and time-lapse signal, compared to parallel processing.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrst/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrst.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls,
	title = {Time-lapse seismic without repetition: reaping the benefits from randomized sampling and joint recovery},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In the current paradigm of 4-D seismic, guaranteeing repeatability in acquisition and processing of the baseline and monitor surveys ranks highest amongst the technical challenges one faces in detecting time-lapse signals. By using recent insights from the field of compressive sensing, we show that the condition of survey repeatability can be relaxed as long as we carry out a sparsitypromoting program that exploits shared information between the baseline and monitor surveys. By inverting for the baseline and monitor survey as the common "background", we are able to compute high-fidelity 4-D differences from carefully selected synthetic surveys that have different sets of source/receivers missing. This synthetic example is proof of concept of an exciting new approach to randomized 4-D acquisition where time-lapse signal can be computed as long as the survey details, such as source/receiver locations are known afterwards.},
	keywords = {4-D seismic, EAGE, joint recovery, time-lapse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20141478},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls/oghenekohwo2014EAGEtls_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2014SINBADuwc,
	title = {Use what{\textquoteleft}s in common: time-lapse FWI with distributed Compressive Sensing},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In this talk, we will extend our joint recovery formulation to FWI in time-lapse seismic, using the modified Gauss-Newton approach. Leveraging ideas from distributed compressive sensing, we exploit shared information in the sparse model perturbations of the baseline and monitor data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/oghenekohwo2014SINBADuwc/oghenekohwo2014SINBADuwc.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld,
	title = {Assessing the need for repeatability in acquisition of time-lapse data},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {There are several factors that affect the repeatability of 4D(time-lapse) seismic data. One of the most significant factors is the repeatability of the acquisition, particularly the locations of the sources and receivers. It is important to repeat the source-receiver locations, used during the baseline survey, in the monitor or repeat survey. Also, it is essential that the stacked data volumes used for time-lapse analysis are created using the same offset ranges for each survey. This condition is crucial in order to be able to produce an image of the same location over a period of time and enhances proper reservoir characterization. The cost of repeating the seismic acquisition is very expensive, as often times, the receiver array has to be left at the same location over the period for which the data will be acquired. In other words, it is important to repeat the acquisition geometry as much as possible. In this talk, we investigate the results of changing the acquisition geometry, by a random placement of the receivers for both the baseline surveys and newer (monitor) surveys. Results show that we are still able to observe any time-lapse effects from the proposed acquisition geometry. Our experiments have been performed on a synthetic model.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, CSEG, migration, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2013/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2013/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld/oghenekohwo2013CSEGnratld_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt,
	title = {Estimating 4D differences in time-lapse using randomized sampling techniques},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Repeatability in the seismic survey and processing has been cited as the main reason for which 4D seismic technology work. In the last decade, concerted efforts have been spent to make the 4D seismic process highly repeatable, without significant success. On the contrary, Compressed Sensing, which is also a relatively new sampling paradigm proposes that one can recover an estimate of a fully sampled signal from a noisy, under-sampled measurements provided the acquisition architecture satisfies some properties. By observing different under-sampled and random measurements from each vintage, corresponding to different acquisition geometries, we show that one can still detect the 4D change in time using recent ideas from Compressed sensing. Using a realistic synthetic model, we show two methods of estimating the 4D difference and compare their relative performance to each other.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt/oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {oghenekohwo2013SEGtlswrs,
	title = {Time-lapse seismics with randomized sampling},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2013-3},
	year = {2013},
	institution = {UBC},
	abstract = {In time-lapse or 4D seismics, repeatability of the acquisition is a very crucial step, as we do not want spurious events that are not there. In this paper, we propose an approach which avoids any requirement to repeat the surveys, by using randomized sampling technique which allows us to be more efficient in the acquisition. Our method applies to sampling data using ocean bottom nodes (OBN) as receivers. We test the efficacy of our proposed randomized acquisition geometry for time-lapse survey on two different models. In the first example, model properties does not change with time, while in the second example, model exhibit a time-lapse effect which may be caused by the migration of fluid within the reservoir. We perform two types of randomized sampling - uniform randomized sampling and jittered sampling to visualize the effects of non-repeatability in time-lapse survey. We observe that jittered randomized sampling is a more efficient method compared to randomized sampling, due to it{\textquoteright}s requirement to control the maximum spacing between the receivers. The results are presented, in the image space, as a least-squares migration of the model perturbation and they are shown for a subset of a synthetic model - the Marmousi model},
	keywords = {Acquisition, migration, time-lapse},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2013/oghenekohwo2013SEGtlswrs/oghenekohwo2013SEGtlswrs.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2012SINBADcs,
	title = {Compressed sensing: a tool for eliminating repeatability in acquisition of 4D (time-lapse) seismic data},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In 4D (time-lapse) seismic data acquisition, a very significant step is the repeatability of the acquisition process. In other words, the geophones must be placed at the exact location as they were, during baseline survey and acquisition. This condition is required to be able to produce an image of the same location over time and this enhances a proper reservoir characterization. The cost of repeating the seismic acquisition is very expensive, as geophones (receivers) have to be left at the same location over the period for which the data will be acquired. In this talk, we attempt to highlight the effort of Compressed Sensing, to eliminate this condition of repeatability of the acquisition. We show that a random sampling of the shots or random placement of the geophones is able to reproduce the same image over time, hence eliminating any acquisition imprints on the final seismic image.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/oghenekohwo2012SINBADcs/oghenekohwo2012SINBADcs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo}
}
