@presentation {peters2015SINBADrwi,
	title = {Regularizing waveform inversion by projections onto convex sets},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {A framework is proposed for regularizing the waveform inversion problem by projections onto intersections of convex sets. Multiple pieces of prior information about the geology are represented by multiple convex sets, for example limits on the velocity or minimum smoothness conditions on the model. The data-misfit is then minimized, such that the estimated model is always in the intersection of the convex sets. Therefore, it is clear what properties the estimated model will have at each iteration. This approach does not require any quadratic penalties to be used and thus avoids the known problems and limitations of those types of penalties. It is shown that by formulating waveform inversion as a constrained problem, regularization ideas such as Tikhonov regularization and gradient filtering can be incorporated into one framework. The algorithm is generally applicable, in the sense that it works with any (differentiable) objective function and does not require significant additional computation. The method is demonstrated on the inversion of the 2D marine isotropic elastic synthetic seismic benchmark by Chevron using an acoustic modeling code. To highlight the effect of the projections, we apply no data pre-processing.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/peters2015SINBADrwi/peters2015SINBADrwi.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Brendan R. Smithyman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {peters2015SINBADFrwi,
	title = {Regularizing waveform inversion by projections onto intersections of convex sets},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Common strategies to regularize waveform inversion (and other geophysical inverse problems) are adding quadratic penalty terms to the objective function or filtering the gradients used to update the model estimate. An example are penalties or filters to prevent/filter spurious high spatial frequency oscillations in the model while working with low frequency data. We present an alternative way of regularization, which works by projecting the model onto an intersection of convex sets, where each sets encodes certain desired model properties. This approach has certain theoretical and practical advantages over quadratic penalties or gradient filters. Some examples of useful convex sets in various challenging waveform inversion settings are shown on both real and synthetic data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/peters2015SINBADFrwi/peters2015SINBADFrwi.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/peters2015SINBADFrwi/peters2015SINBADFrwi.mov},
	author = {Bas Peters and Brendan R. Smithyman and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {peters2014SINBADcda,
	title = {Challenges and developments arising from 2D FWI of a land VSP dataset in the Permian Basin},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion was carried out to map 3D velocity structures for a site in the Permian Basin of Texas, USA. The data come from co-located surface and 3D VSP seismic surveys that share common source vibration points. This challenging on-land setting has been used as a testbed to evaluate our FWI algorithms and their effectiveness when applied to real-data problems. We discuss the challenges posed by this case study, and several new techniques and methodological refinements that have been developed and tested as a result. These include: regularization and incorporation of multiple datasets in an on-land FWI workflow; restrictions on the types of models allowed (viz., smoothness regularization) by quadratic penalty and by Projected Quasi-Newton (PQN) inversion; corrections to enable 2D FWI and recovery of 3D models; the state of ongoing work in WRI ({\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}Penalty Method{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} inversion) and the handling of anisotropy.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/peters2014SINBADcda/peters2014SINBADcda.pdf},
	author = {Brendan R. Smithyman and Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {li2013SINBADgom,
	title = {Lessons learned from Chevron Gulf of Mexico data set},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Chevron Gulf of Mexico data set is very challenging for FWI because of elastic phases, limited offset, lack of low frequencies and salt structure. To overcome these issue, we first use ray-based tomography on the hand-picked first breaks to generate initial model for FWI, and then we apply curvelet-denosing techniques to improve the poor signal-to-noise ratio of the observed data at low frequencies. Finally, Curvelet domain sparsity promoting Gauss-Newton FWI helps to suppress model space artifacts caused by elastic phases. This is joint work with Andrew J. Calvert, Ian Hanlon, Mostafa Javanmehri, Rajiv Kumar, Tristan van Leeuwen, Brendan R. Smithyman, Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/li2013SINBADgom/li2013SINBADgom.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Brendan R. Smithyman and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {smithyman2013SINBADprb,
	title = {Phase-residual based quality-control methods and techniques for mitigating cycle skips},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Most full-waveform inversion algorithms use local optimization methods to iteratively improve the numerical earth model. All of these make the implicit assumption that the the model close to the true earth to avoid cycle. In practice this may not be true. We explore two questions: 1. How do we understand and visualize the cycle skip phenomenon in order to recognize it if it exists? 2. How do we automate this quality control step and use the rich information from multiple data to mitigate cycle skips and avoid local minima?},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/smithyman2013SINBADprb/smithyman2013SINBADprb.pdf},
	author = {Brendan R. Smithyman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {herrmann2012SINBADfwi,
	title = {Our findings on the Chevron benchmark dataset},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {During this presentation, we will review our findings working with the synthetic GOM data released as part of the post SEG workshop:"Gulf of Mexico Imaging Challenges: What Can Full Waveform Inversion Achieve?". This is joint work with Andrew J. Calvert, Ian Hanlon, Mostafa Javanmehri, Rajiv Kumar, Tristan van Leeuwen, Xiang Li, Brendan R. Smithyman, Eric Takam Takougang, and Haneet Wason.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2012, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2012/Fall/herrmann2012SINBADfwi/herrmann2012SINBADfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li and Brendan R. Smithyman and Eric Takam Takougang and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
