@mastersthesis {peters2019THiso,
	title = {Intersections and sums of sets for the regularization of inverse problems},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(PhD)},
	month = {05},
	school = {The University of British Columbia},
	type = {phd},
	address = {Vancouver},
	abstract = {Inverse problems in the imaging sciences encompass a variety of applications. The primary problem of interest is the identification of physical parameters from observed data that come from experiments governed by partial-differential-equations. The secondary type of imaging problems attempts to reconstruct images and video that are corrupted by, for example, noise, subsampling, blur, or saturation. The quality of the solution of an inverse problem is sensitive to issues such as noise and missing entries in the data. The non-convex seismic full-waveform inversion problem suffers from parasitic local minima that lead to wrong solutions that may look realistic even for noiseless data. To meet some of these challenges, I propose solution strategies that constrain the model parameters at every iteration to help guide the inversion. To arrive at this goal, I present new practical workflows, algorithms, and software, that avoid manual tuning-parameters and that allow us to incorporate multiple pieces of prior knowledge. Opposed to penalty methods, I avoid balancing the influence of multiple pieces of prior knowledge by working with intersections of constraint sets. I explore and present advantages of constraints for imaging. Because the resulting problems are often non-trivial to solve, especially on large 3D grids, I introduce faster algorithms, dedicated to computing projections onto intersections of multiple sets. To connect prior knowledge more directly to problem formulations, I also combine ideas from additive models, such as cartoon-texture decomposition and robust principal component analysis, with intersections of multiple constraint sets for the regularization of inverse problems. The result is an extension of the concept of a Minkowski set. Examples from non-unique physical parameter estimation problems show that constraints in combination with projection methods provide control over the model properties at every iteration. This can lead to improved results when the constraints are carefully relaxed.},
	keywords = {FWI, Optimization, PhD, regularization, Sets},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2019/peters2019THiso/peters2019THiso.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2019/peters2019THiso/peters2019THiso_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters}
}
@conference {peters2016SEGprs,
	title = {Parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1411-1415},
	abstract = {This abstract is about reducing the total computation time to solve full-waveform inversion problems. A common problem formulation is a nonlinear least-squares problem where the gradient is computed using the adjoint-state algorithm. This formulation offers parallelism for the computation of gradients for different sources and frequencies. The adjoint-state algorithm itself is sequential however and this is a limiting factor when a lot of compute nodes are available and only a few wavefields need to be computed. This situation occurs when stochastic optimization strategies are used to minimize the objective function. We present a parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state algorithm, which allows the forward- and adjoint wavefields to be computed in parallel. Both algorithms are mathematically equivalent but the parallel version is twice as fast in run time. An important characteristic of the proposed algorithm is that one wavefield needs to be computed per source and one per receiver. These fields can be used to apply the (inverse) Gauss-Newton Hessian to a vector without recomputing wavefields. A 2D example shows that good full-waveform inversion results are obtained, even when a small number of sources and receivers is used.},
	keywords = {FWI, numerical linear algebra, parallel computing, PDE-constrained optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13966771.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2015SIAMpcf,
	title = {Pros and cons of full- and reduced-space methods for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, Stanford University, California)},
	month = {06-07},
	abstract = {By insisting on fitting observed data, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) is no longer cycle skipped and therefore less reliant on the accuracy of starting models. While extending the search space mitigates local minima, there are challenges scaling to 3D seismic when using reduced-space methods that require accurate solves. Conversely, full-space methods allow for inaccurate solves but require storage of all wavefields. We weigh pros and cons of these two approaches in the seismic context.},
	keywords = {FWI, SIAM, WRI},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2015/herrmann2015SIAMpcf/herrmann2015SIAMpcf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {louboutin2015IIPFWIrwi,
	title = {Regularizing waveform inversion by projections onto convex sets},
	booktitle = {Inaugural Full-Waveform Inversion Workshop},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Natal, Brazil)},
	month = {08-09},
	abstract = {A framework is proposed for regularizing the waveform inversion problem by projections onto intersections of convex sets. Multiple pieces of prior information about the geology are represented by multiple convex sets, for example limits on the velocity or minimum smoothness conditions on the model. The data-misfit is then minimized, such that the estimated model is always in the intersection of the convex sets. Therefore, it is clear what properties the estimated model will have at each iteration. This approach does not require any quadratic penalties to be used and thus avoids the known problems and limitations of those types of penalties. It is shown that by formulating waveform inversion as a constrained problem, regularization ideas such as Tikhonov regularization and gradient filtering can be incorporated into one framework. The algorithm is generally applicable, in the sense that it works with any (differentiable) objective function and does not require significant additional computation. The method is demonstrated on the inversion of the 2D marine isotropic elastic synthetic seismic benchmark by Chevron using an acoustic modeling code. To highlight the effect of the projections, we apply no data pre-processing. This is joint work with Bas Peters.},
	keywords = {convex, FWI, regularization},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IIPFWI/louboutin2015IIPFWIrwi/louboutin2015IIPFWIrwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Mathias Louboutin and Bas Peters and Brendan R. Smithyman and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014SEGWS,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) {\textendash} a new take on wave-equation based inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Full Waveform Inversion - Elastic Approaches and Issues with Anisotropy, Nonshallow Inversion, Poor Starting Model; Denver},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Denver)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/herrmann2014SEGWSwri/herrmann2014SEGWSwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Bas Peters}
}
