@unpublished {gahlot2026IMAGEirs,
	title = {Improving reservoir state prediction in digital shadows using Radon-transformed subsurface common-offset gathers},
	year = {2026},
	month = {3},
	abstract = {Digital shadows for subsurface monitoring use simulation-based inference to map seismic and well-log observations to evolving reservoir states such as CO 2  saturation and pressure. When the simulation forward models rely on simplified or misspecified rock physics, predictions become biased and uncertainty quantification degrades. We address this by combining rock-physics-aware amortized Bayesian inference with inference in the Radon domain of common-image gathers (CIGs). Angle-dependent information from Radon-transformed subsurface offset gathers improves separation of fluid and stress effects: fluids exhibit distinct amplitude-variation-with-angle (AVA) signatures, so conditioning the digital shadow on angle gathers yields more accurate and physically consistent joint estimates of saturation and pressure than conditioning on migrated stacks or offset-domain gathers. We train a context-aware amortized posterior estimator that conditions on seismic data and rock-physics context, enabling robustness to model misspecification and structured what-if analysis at inference time without retraining. On a synthetic 2D geological carbon storage scenario, conditioning on Radon-transformed CIGs improves joint saturation and pressure prediction relative to reverse-time migrated images, while context conditioning preserves interpretability and calibration under rock physics uncertainty.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, SEG, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2026/gahlot2026IMAGEirs/abstract.html},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2026/gahlot2026IMAGEirs/IMAGE_Abhinav.pdf},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@unpublished {li2026IMAGEsca,
	title = {JUDIAgent: a scientific coding agent for JUDI workflows in wave-equation imaging},
	year = {2026},
	month = {3},
	abstract = {We present JUDIAgent, a scientific coding assistant for JUDI.jl, an open-source Julia framework for wave-equation-based seismic modeling, imaging, and inversion. In seismic experimentation, the practical difficulty is not only writing executable code, but assembling a complete seismic workflow with the required physical model, acquisition geometry, modeling or migration operator, and saved outputs needed for inspection. JUDIAgent addresses this problem by retrieving JUDI examples, generating Julia code, running the code in the target environment, and checking whether the generated script contains the requested workflow pieces and outputs, such as acquisition geometry and saved figures. We demonstrate the system with validated 2D forward-modeling and reverse-time migration (RTM) examples. These case studies show that, for JUDI-based seismic scripts, domain-aware validation can turn a lightweight user request into a more complete experimental workflow by detecting missing workflow steps that are not captured by runtime correctness alone and by making the resulting scripts easier to inspect and revise.},
	keywords = {Agentic AI, devito, FWI, IMAGE, Imaging, JUDI, RTM, scientific coding agent, SEG},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2026/li2026IMAGEsca/abstract.html},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2026/li2026IMAGEsca/IMAGE_Haoyun.pdf},
	author = {Haoyun Li and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@unpublished {zeng2026IMAGEssn,
	title = {Self-attention summary networks for subsurface velocity-model building from common-image gathers},
	year = {2026},
	month = {3},
	abstract = {Common-image gathers (CIGs) contain physically meaningful information about velocity-model errors through reflector focusing and residual moveout, but in conventional imaging workflows they are typically used only as diagnostic tools. In this work, we propose a multiscale self-attention summary network that maps high-dimensional 3D CIG volumes into compact conditioning embeddings for probabilistic subsurface velocity inversion. These learned embeddings preserve offset-dependent kinematic structure and spatial coherence while reducing variability caused by background-velocity mismatch. Conditioned on these summary embeddings, a flow-matching model learns a transport from a Gaussian source distribution to the posterior distribution of plausible velocity fields. Numerical experiments show that, compared with direct conditioning on raw CIGs, the proposed summary network improves posterior velocity inference. In particular, the multiscale attention design provides greater robustness to background-model mismatch, yielding more accurate posterior reconstructions and lower predictive uncertainty.},
	keywords = {attention, Bayesian inference, CIG, deep learning, diffusion models, FWI, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, learned summary statistics, RTM, SEG, uncertainty calibration, Uncertainty quantification, velocity model building, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2026/zeng2026IMAGEssn/abstract.html},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2026/zeng2026IMAGEssn/IMAGE_Shiqin.pdf},
	author = {Shiqin Zeng and Yunlin Zeng and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Zijun Deng and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@unpublished {gahlot2025EAGEagc,
	title = {Advancing Geological Carbon Storage Monitoring with 3D Digital Shadow Technology},
	year = {2025},
	month = {6},
	keywords = {3D digital shadow, Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, experimental design, FWI, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, RTM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2025/gahlot2025EAGEagc/abstract.html},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Rafael Orozco and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann20205IMAGEapg,
	title = {Attention Please: Getting the Most from CIGs with Learned Summary Statistics},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2025},
	month = {8},
	keywords = {attention, Bayesian inference, CIG, deep learning, diffusion models, FWI, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, learned summary statistics, RTM, SEG, uncertainty calibration, Uncertainty quantification, velocity model building, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/herrmann20205IMAGEapg},
	author = {Shiqin Zeng and Rafael Orozco and Yunlin Zeng and Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2025IMAGEceo,
	title = {CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Through Digital Shadow Modeling},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2025},
	month = {8},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, EOR, experimental design, FWI, GCS, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, RTM, SEG, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/li2025IMAGEceo},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/li2025IMAGEceo/IMAGE_Haoyun.pdf},
	author = {Haoyun Li and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2025SEGSPEcua,
	title = {Context- and uncertainty-aware Digital Twins for Integrated Reservoir Management},
	booktitle = {SEG/SPE 2nd Integrated Reservoir Characterization, Surveillance, and Management Workshop: Advances and Challenges},
	year = {2025},
	month = {7},
	abstract = {We present a new framework for Digital Twins (DTs) that supports uncertainty-aware monitoring, optimization, and risk management of underground storage operations, with a particular focus on Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) and Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). The proposed DT addresses key challenges in reservoir characterization, surveillance, and management by integrating generative AI methods with simulation-based inference, enabling scalable, probabilistic decision support under uncertainty. Our approach combines sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI) with ensemble-based data assimilation to efficiently incorporate multimodal time-lapse observations, such as seismic and well data, into dynamic reservoir models. By embedding context-awareness into neural networks, we account for variability in rock-physics relationships linking pressure, saturation, and seismic responses, and quantify uncertainties arising from model misspecifications{\textendash}-e.g. usage of patchy versus uniform saturation models. Computational efficiency is maintained through weight sharing across the network trained on different rock-physics scenarios, enabling rapid evaluation of the impact changing the underlying rock-physics model. The DT is built on industry-strength open-source software: {\textquoteleft}JutulDarcy.jl{\textquoteleft} for fully coupled multiphase flow simulations and {\textquoteleft}JUDI.jl{\textquoteleft}, a seismic inversion package leveraging the {\textquoteleft}Devito{\textquoteleft} finite-difference framework. This computational foundation allows scalable integration of physics-based simulations and data assimilation across large reservoir models, while retaining flexibility to adapt to varying physical contexts such as the inclusion of pressure-dependence of the compressional wavespeed. The resulting DT not only delivers posterior distributions for the reservoir{\textquoteright}s state (pressure/saturation) conditioned on available observations but also enables rapid {\textquotedblleft}what-if{\textquotedblright} scenario analysis by drawing posterior samples across a range of physical contexts without retraining. This capability supports proactive storage management, optimization of injection operations, and improved assurance of storage conformance.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, SEG, SPE, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEGSPE/2025/herrmann2025SEGSPEcua},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Ipsita Bhar and Haoyun Li and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2025AIDT4EScad,
	title = {Context-aware Digital Twin for Underground Storage},
	booktitle = {Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Earth Systems 2025, Austin, TX},
	year = {2025},
	month = {9},
	keywords = {AIDT4ES, Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/AIDT4ES/2025/herrmann2025AIDT4EScad},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Haoyun Li and Ipsita Bhar and Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Rafael Orozco and Ziyi Yin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2025IMSIcad,
	title = {Context-Aware Digital Twin for Underground Storage Operations and Decision Making},
	booktitle = {Data Assimilation and Inverse Problems for Digital Twins Workshop 205, IMSI, Chicago},
	year = {2025},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, decision making, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IMSI/2025/herrmann2025IMSIcad},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Haoyun Li and Ipsita Bhar and Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Rafael Orozco and Ziyi Yin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2025ML4SEISMICdsc,
	title = {Digital Shadow for CO2-based Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR)},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {We present a Digital Shadow for CO2-based Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR), a data-driven surrogate model that predicts reservoir dynamics by conditioning on time-lapse seismic observations. Built upon conditional normalizing flows, the Digital Shadow learns the posterior distribution of subsurface states{\textemdash}CO2 and oil saturation{\textemdash}conditioned on seismic data generated through coupled multiphase flow and rock-physics modeling. The framework integrates high-fidelity simulations with JutulDarcy.jl, nonlinear seismic forward modeling and imaging with JUDI.jl, and nonlinear rock-physics mappings to relate saturation changes to changes in the acoustic properties. Trained on 128 stochastic realizations derived from a North Sea permeability distribution, the model achieves accurate posterior samples for the saturation fields with high structural similarity to the ground truth. This work demonstrates how integrating differentiable physics with generative modeling enables seismic-informed monitoring of CO2 plume evolution and oil recovery, laying the foundation for a Digital Twin of CO2-based EOR operations.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, EOR, experimental design, FWI, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, permeability, reservoir simulation, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/li2025ML4SEISMICdsc},
	author = {Haoyun Li and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Olav Moyner and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@unpublished {gahlot2025EAGEerd,
	title = {Enhancing robustness of Digital Shadow for CO 2  Storage Monitoring with Augmented Rock Physics Modeling},
	year = {2025},
	month = {6},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, augmentation, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, FWI, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, rock physics, RTM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Submitted/2025/gahlot2025EAGEerd/abstract.html},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {gahlot2025SIAMiac,
	title = {It{\textquoteright}s All in the Context: Sensitivity-Aware Digital Twins for Underground Storage},
	booktitle = {SIAM Conference on Mathematical \& Computational Issues in the Geosciences, Baton Rouge},
	year = {2025},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, decision making, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, SIAM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2025/gahlot2025SIAMiac},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Ipsita Bhar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {gahlot2025ML4SEISMICmrm,
	title = {Mitigating Rock-Physics Model Misspecification in Digital Shadows via Amortized Bayesian Inference},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Digital shadows for subsurface monitoring rely on simulation-based inference to map seismic observations to evolving reservoir states. However, when the simulations are generated using simplified or different rock physics models than those governing the observed data, model misspecification leads to biased posterior estimates and degraded uncertainty quantification. We address this challenge through Bayesian frameworks including rock-physics marginalization and a context-aware amortized inference using conditional normalizing flows. The framework learns a mapping from seismic responses to pressure and saturation while accounting for variability across different randomly drawn models for the rock-physics. To enhance sensitivity to fluid and stress effects, we also incorporate pressure-dependent rock physics into the seismic forward model and perform inference in the Radon domain of Common Image Gathers (CIGs) instead of conventional RTM images. Because fluids exhibit distinct angle-dependent signatures in AVA responses, Radon-transformed CIGs are expected to provide improved separation between pressure and saturation effects, leading to more accurate and physically consistent state estimates. Thus, it enables an uncertainty-aware, physics-informed digital shadows under rock-physics model mismatch.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, CIG, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/gahlot2025ML4SEISMICmrm},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Ipsita Bhar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {erdinc2025ML4SEISMICpbi,
	title = {Power-scaled Bayesian inference for velocity-model estimation},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Score-based generative models have emerged as powerful tools for conditional generation in Bayesian inference. While promising, a common criticism of these methods is their reliance on strong, structured priors, which can dominate the inference process and limit the network{\textquoteright}s dependence on observed data. To address this issue, we propose a modification to the generative sampling algorithm that incorporates power scaling of both priors and likelihoods. Our approach enables flexible control over the relative influence of the prior and likelihood without requiring retraining for different scaling configurations. We demonstrate this in the context of synthesizing seismic velocity models conditioned on imaged seismic data. By sampling from intermediate power posteriors, our method naturally supports sensitivity analysis and allows us to assess how varying prior and likelihood weights determines the behavior of the posterior. Through a comprehensive set of experiments, we examine the impact of the power parameters in three scenarios: scaling only the prior, scaling only the likelihood, and scaling both simultaneously. The results show that increasing the likelihood power up to a certain threshold improves the fidelity of posterior samples to the conditioning data, while reducing prior power increases structural diversity in the generated models. Furthermore, moderate likelihood scaling leads to reduced shot data residuals, demonstrating its effectiveness for posterior refinement.},
	keywords = {Bayesian inference, deep learning, generative model, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, power-scaling, RTM, score, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/erdinc2025ML4SEISMICpbi},
	author = {Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Yunlin Zeng and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {erdinc2025IMAGEpbi,
	title = {Power-scaled Bayesian inference with score-based generative models},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2025},
	month = {8},
	keywords = {Bayesian inference, deep learning, generative model, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, power-scaling, RTM, score, SEG, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2504.10807},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/erdinc2025IMAGEpbi},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/erdinc2025IMAGEpbi/IMAGE_Tuna.pdf},
	author = {Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Yunlin Zeng and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {henriksson2025ML4SEISMICpss,
	title = {Predicting Subsurface CO2 Saturation using Late Fusion of Seismic and Streaming Well Data},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Determining subsurface flow of CO2 in porous rock formations is a challenging task especially when it involves intergration of multimodal data that are collected at disparate timescales. In this work, we investigate how data fushion can be used to integrate multimodal data consisting on infrequently collected active-source seismic surveys and continuous streaming data of saturation measurements collected at monitoring wells. For the purpose, we propose a data fusion framework based on late fusion, which combines seismic images, computed from seismic surveys, with time-series data collected at the wells. By integrating the spatial information from seismic data with high-resolution but sparce spatial-temporal patterns from wells, we aim to better approximate the complex CO2 flow patterns.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, late fusion, ML4SEISMIC, permeability, reservoir simulation, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/henriksson2025ML4SEISMICpss},
	author = {Victor Henriksson and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2025ML4SEISMICric,
	title = {Risk-Aware Injectivity Control for Energy Storage},
	booktitle = {ML4SEISMIC Partners Meeting},
	year = {2025},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {We introduce a digital-twin{\textendash}driven framework for real-time injectivity control that maximizes injected CO2 while enforcing reservoir safety. The forward model is a multiphase flow simulator evolving reservoir states under injectivity controls q; time-lapse seismic acts as the observation operator to reduce uncertainty of the the state (reservoir{\textquoteright}s saturation/pressure). Risk is handled via two complementary metrics: the Probability of Failure (POF) for exceedance likelihood and the less conservative CVaR (superquantile) for tail severity. For the optimization, we employ smooth surrogates{\textemdash}a logistic exceedance rate for POF and the Rockafellar{\textendash}Uryasev formulation for CVaR{\textemdash}enabling gradient-based control with constraints. Within a finite-horizon Model Predictive Control (MPC) loop, we optimize a trajectory per posterior sample and aggregate the ensemble of optimal rates into an empirical (KDE-kernel) Cumulative Density Function (CDF) with binomial confidence bands; the final controlled injectivity q is chosen as the largest rate whose upper confidence bound satisfies the target risk level. Case studies demonstrate that POF-constrained optimization is more conservative than CVaR-based optimization, In addition, sensitivity of the policy to the CVaR tail level, α, is reduced compared to POF{\textquoteright}s parameter sensitivity, allowing for adaptive, uncertainty-aware control that balances injectivity and fracture risk. The proposed framework also unifies time-lapse seismic-informed inference, risk metrics, and MPC into a practical approach for safe high-throughput underground energy storage.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, EOR, experimental design, FWI, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, permeability, reservoir simulation, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2025/li2025ML4SEISMICric},
	author = {Haoyun Li and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {bruer2025GSCSsmc,
	title = {Seismic monitoring of CO2 using ensemble Kalman filtering},
	year = {2025},
	note = {(GSCS, Gatech)},
	month = {02},
	keywords = {CCS, EnKF, fluid flow, GCS, GSCS, Imaging, monitoring, RTM, SLIM, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Posters/GSCS/2025/bruer2025GSCSsmc/2025GSCS_poster.pdf},
	author = {Grant Bruer and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix Herrmann and Edmond Chow}
}
@conference {gahlot2025IMAGEsrp,
	title = {Sensitivity-aware rock physics enhanced digital shadow for underground-energy storage monitoring},
	booktitle = {International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy},
	year = {2025},
	month = {8},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, experimental design, GCS, IMAGE, Imaging, Inverse problems, permeability, reservoir simulation, rock physics, RTM, SEG, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2504.14405},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/gahlot2025IMAGEsrp},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2025/gahlot2025IMAGEsrp/IMAGE_Abhinav.pdf},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {herrmann2024ML4SEISMICdtg,
	title = {A Digital Twin for Geological Carbon Storage with Controlled Injectivity},
	year = {2024},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {We present an uncertainty-aware Digital Twin (DT) for geologic carbon storage (GCS), capable of handling multimodal time-lapse data and controlling CO 2  injectivity to mitigate reservoir fracturing risks. In GCS, DT represents virtual replicas of subsurface systems that incorporate real-time data and advanced generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) techniques, including neural posterior density estimation via simulation-based inference and sequential Bayesian inference. These methods enable the effective monitoring and control of CO 2  storage projects, addressing challenges such as subsurface complexity, operational optimization, and risk mitigation. By integrating diverse monitoring data, e.g., geophysical well observations and imaged seismic, DT can bridge the gaps between seemingly distinct fields like geophysics and reservoir engineering. In addition, the recent advancements in genAI also facilitate DT with principled uncertainty quantification. Through recursive training and inference, DT utilizes simulated current state samples, e.g., CO 2  saturation, paired with corresponding geophysical field observations to train its neural networks and enable posterior sampling upon receiving new field data. However, it lacks decision-making and control capabilities, which is necessary for full DT functionality. This study aims to demonstrate how DT can inform decision-making processes to prevent risks such as cap rock fracturing during CO 2  storage operations.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, augmentation, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, FWI, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, rock physics, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2024/herrmann2024ML4SEISMICdtg},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Haoyun Li and Ziyi Yin and Rafael Orozco and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {gahlot2024ICLdtg,
	title = {Digital Twins in the era of generative AI - Application to Geological CO2 Storage},
	year = {2024},
	month = {6},
	abstract = {Our industry is experiencing significant changes due to AI and the challenges of the energy transition. While some view these changes as threats, recent advances in AI offer unique opportunities, especially in the context of Digital Twins for subsurface monitoring and control. IBM defines "A digital twin is a virtual representation of an object or system that spans its lifecycle, is updated from real-time data, and uses simulation, machine learning and reasoning to help decision-making." During this talk, I will explore these concepts and their significance in addressing the challenges of monitoring \& control of geological CO2 storage projects. This talk also aims to illustrate how Digital Twins can serve as a platform to integrate the seemingly disparate and siloed fields of geophysics and reservoir engineering.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, Bayesian inference, CIG, conditional normalizing flows, control, data assimilation, deep learning, digital twin, FWI, GCS, Imaging, Inverse problems, MVA, RTM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification, WISE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICL/2024/gahlot2024ICLdtg},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Rafael Orozco and Haoyun Li and Huseyin Tuna Erdinc and Ziyi Yin and Mathias Louboutin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {gahlot2024ML4SEISMICosm,
	title = {Optimizing CO2 Storage Monitoring with Enhanced Rock Physics Modeling},
	year = {2024},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Based on the latest data-assimilation and machine-learning techniques, Digital Twins (DTs) have shown promise for high-fidelity monitoring and control of underground CO2​ storage. While the use of these techniques have important advantages, they do rely on certain assumptions. If these assumptions are not met, the DT{\textquoteright}s neural networks may no longer infer the state of the CO2 plume (pressure/saturation) accurately. By augmenting the forecast ensemble, we address this issue.},
	keywords = {Amortized Variational Inference, augmentation, Bayesian inference, conditional normalizing flows, data assimilation, deep learning, FWI, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, rock physics, RTM, SLIM, Summary Statistics, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2024/gahlot2024ML4SEISMICosm},
	author = {Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {bruer2024ML4SEISMICsmp,
	title = {Seismic monitoring of CO2 plume dynamics using ensemble Kalman filtering},
	year = {2024},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {Monitoring CO 2  injected and stored in subsurface reservoirs is critical for avoiding failure scenarios and enables real-time optimization of CO 2  injection rates. Sequential Bayesian data assimilation (DA) is a statistical method for combining information over time from multiple sources to estimate a hidden state, such as the spread of the subsurface CO 2  plume. An example of scalable and efficient sequential Bayesian DA is the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). We improve upon existing DA literature in the seismic-CO 2  monitoring domain by applying this scalable DA algorithm to a high-dimensional CO 2  reservoir using two-phase flow dynamics and time-lapse full waveform seismic data with a realistic surface-seismic survey design. We show more accurate estimates of the CO 2  saturation field using the EnKF compared to using either the seismic data or the fluid physics alone. Furthermore, we test a range of values for the EnKF hyperparameters and give guidance on their selection for seismic CO 2  reservoir monitoring.},
	keywords = {Bayesian inference, data assimilation, ensemble Kalman filter, FWI, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, RTM, SLIM, two-phase flow, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2024/bruer2024ML4SEISMICsmp},
	author = {Grant Bruer and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Edmond Chow and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {bhar2024ML4SEISMICshs,
	title = {Sensitivity of Horizontal shear waves on Geological Carbon Storage},
	year = {2024},
	month = {11},
	abstract = {With the growing focus on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) activities, the significance of shear wave velocity (Vs) in monitoring CO2 is becoming increasingly important. Shear waves are instrumental in detecting CO2 leakage, evaluating CCS-induced seismicity, and identifying caprock failure. According to Biot-Gassmann rock physics models, changes in seismic velocity are expected during CO2 injection. This work specifically focuses on the horizontal component of shear wave velocity (Vsh). Shear (Sh) waves are more sensitive to density variations than P-wave or Sv wave velocities, leading us to anticipate changes in Sh velocity as CO2 saturation increases. While P-wave velocity tends to decrease with supercritical CO2 injection, the investigation of its effects on Sh waves presents a particularly compelling area of study. Therefore, we simulated the wave equation incorporating both P-wave and Sh wave velocities to better understand their impacts on imaging and CO2 injection processes.},
	keywords = {FWI, Imaging, Inverse problems, ML4SEISMIC, RTM, SH wave, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ML4SEISMIC/2024/bhar2024ML4SEISMICshs},
	author = {Ipsita Bhar and Abhinav Prakash Gahlot and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
