@conference {kumar2015IIPFWIrmb,
	title = {Rank minimization based seismic data processing and inversion},
	booktitle = {Inaugural Full-Waveform Inversion Workshop},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(Natal, Brazil)},
	month = {08-09},
	abstract = {We present the low-rank extensions of full-waveform inversion to mitigate the local-minima issues. The purpose formulation is computationally tractable and does not involve any extra computational cost compared to the adjoint-state method.},
	keywords = {FWI, inversion, Processing, rank minimization},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/IIPFWI/kumar2015IIPFWIrmb/kumar2015IIPFWIrmb_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Curt Da Silva and Oscar Lopez and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Hassan Mansour and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {Li11TRfrfwi,
	title = {Fast randomized full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {77},
	number = {3},
	year = {2012},
	month = {05},
	pages = {A13-A17},
	abstract = {Wave-equation based seismic inversion can be formulated as a nonlinear inverse problem where the medium properties are obtained via minimization of a least- squares misfit functional. The demand for higher resolution models in more geologically complex areas drives the need to develop techniques that explore the special structure of full-waveform inversion to reduce the computational burden and to regularize the inverse problem. We meet these goals by using ideas from compressive sensing and stochastic optimization to design a novel Gauss-Newton method, where the updates are computed from random subsets of the data via curvelet-domain sparsity promotion. Application of this idea to a realistic synthetic shows improved results compared to quasi-Newton methods, which require passes through all data. Two different subset sampling strategies are considered: randomized source encoding, and drawing sequential shots firing at random source locations from marine data with missing near and far offsets. In both cases, we obtain excellent inversion results compared to conventional methods at reduced computational costs.},
	keywords = {Compressive Sensing, FWI, Optimization, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2011-0410.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2012/Li11TRfrfwi/Li11TRfrfwi.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {Aravkin11TRridr,
	title = {Robust inversion, dimensionality reduction, and randomized sampling},
	journal = {Mathematical Programming},
	volume = {134},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {08},
	pages = {101-125},
	abstract = {We consider a class of inverse problems in which the forward model is the solution operator to linear ODEs or PDEs. This class admits several dimensionality-reduction techniques based on data averaging or sampling, which are especially useful for large-scale problems. We survey these approaches and their connection to stochastic optimization. The data-averaging approach is only viable, however, for a least-squares misfit, which is sensitive to outliers in the data and artifacts unexplained by the forward model. This motivates us to propose a robust formulation based on the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution of the error. We demonstrate how the corresponding penalty function, together with the sampling approach, can obtain good results for a large-scale seismic inverse problem with 50 \% corrupted data.},
	keywords = {FWI, Inverse problems, Optimization, Robust estimation, Seismic inversion, Stochastic optimization},
	doi = {10.1007/s10107-012-0571-6},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/35rwr101h5736340/},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/MathematicalProgramming/aravkin2012MPrid/aravkin2012MPrid.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Michael P. Friedlander and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@article {vanLeeuwen2010IJGswi,
	title = {Seismic waveform inversion by stochastic optimization},
	journal = {International Journal of Geophysics},
	volume = {2011},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Article ID: 689041, 18pages},
	month = {12},
	abstract = {We explore the use of stochastic optimization methods for seismic waveform inversion. The basic principle of such methods is to randomly draw a batch of realizations of a given misfit function and goes back to the 1950s. The ultimate goal of such an approach is to dramatically reduce the computational cost involved in evaluating the misfit. Following earlier work, we introduce the stochasticity in waveform inversion problem in a rigorous way via a technique called randomized trace estimation. We then review theoretical results that underlie recent developments in the use of stochastic methods for waveform inversion. We present numerical experiments to illustrate the behavior of different types of stochastic optimization methods and investigate the sensitivity to the batch size and the noise level in the data. We find that it is possible to reproduce results that are qualitatively similar to the solution of the full problem with modest batch sizes, even on noisy data. Each iteration of the corresponding stochastic methods requires an order of magnitude fewer PDE solves than a comparable deterministic method applied to the full problem, which may lead to an order of magnitude speedup for waveform inversion in practice.},
	keywords = {FWI, Optimization, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1155/2011/689041},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/InternationJournalOfGeophysics/2011/vanLeeuwen10IJGswi/vanLeeuwen10IJGswi.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
