@techreport {esser2014SEGsgp,
	title = {A scaled gradient projection method for total variation regularized full waveform inversion},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2014-2},
	year = {2014},
	month = {04},
	institution = {UBC},
	abstract = {We propose an extended full waveform inversion formulation that includes convex constraints on the model. In particular, we show how to simultaneously constrain the total variation of the slowness squared while enforcing bound constraints to keep it within a physically realistic range. Synthetic experiments show that including total variation regularization can improve the recovery of a high velocity perturbation to a smooth background model.},
	keywords = {convex constraints, full waveform inversion, total variation regularization},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2014/esser2014SEGsgp/esser2014SEGsgp.html},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI,
	title = {In which domain should we measure the misfit for robust full waveform inversion?},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on minimizing the difference between observed and modeled data, as measured by some penalty function. A popular choice, of course, is the least-squares penalty. However, when outliers are present in the data, the use of robust penalties such as the Huber or Student{\textquoteright}s t may significantly improve the results since they put relatively less weight on large residuals. In order for robust penalties to be effective, the outliers must be somehow localized and distinguishable from the good data. We propose to first transform the residual into a domain where the outliers are localized before measuring the misfit with a robust penalty. This is exactly how one would normally devise filters to remove the noise before applying conventional FWI. We propose to merge the two steps and let the inversion process implicitly filter out the noise. Results on a synthetic dataset show the effectiveness of the approach.},
	keywords = {EAGE, full waveform inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130839},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Henri Calandra and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {aravkin2012IPNuisance,
	title = {Estimating nuisance parameters in inverse problems},
	journal = {Inverse Problems},
	volume = {28},
	number = {11},
	year = {2012},
	month = {10},
	abstract = {Many inverse problems include nuisance parameters which, while not of direct interest, are required to recover primary parameters. Structure present in these problems allows efficient optimization strategies - a well known example is variable projection, where nonlinear least squares problems which are linear in some parameters can be very efficiently optimized. In this paper, we extend the idea of projecting out a subset over the variables to a broad class of maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum a posteriori likelihood (MAP) problems with nuisance parameters, such as variance or degrees of freedom. As a result, we are able to incorporate nuisance parameter estimation into large-scale constrained and unconstrained inverse problem formulations. We apply the approach to a variety of problems, including estimation of unknown variance parameters in the Gaussian model, degree of freedom (d.o.f.) parameter estimation in the context of robust inverse problems, automatic calibration, and optimal experimental design. Using numerical examples, we demonstrate improvement in recovery of primary parameters for several large- scale inverse problems. The proposed approach is compatible with a wide variety of algorithms and formulations, and its implementation requires only minor modifications to existing algorithms.},
	keywords = {full waveform inversion, students t, variance},
	doi = {10.1088/0266-5611/28/11/115016},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6532},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/InverseProblems/2012/aravkin2012IPNuisance/aravkin2012IPNuisance.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
