@conference {kadu2018SEGMSFWI,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion with Mumford-Shah regularization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1258-1262},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a non-linear procedure to es- timate subsurface rock parameters from surface measurements of induced seismic waves. This procedure is ill-posed in nature and hence, requires regularization to enhance some structure depending on the prior information. Recently, Total-variation (TV) regularization has gained popularity due to its ability to produce blocky structures. Contrary to this, the earth behave more like a piecewise smooth function. TV regularization fails to enforce this prior information into FWI. We propose a Mumford-Shah functional to incorporate the piecewise smooth spatial structure in the FWI procedure. The resulting opti- mization problem is solved by a splitting method. We show the improvement in results against TV regularization on two synthetic camembert examples.},
	keywords = {FWI, Mumford-Shah, regularization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2997224.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/kadu2018SEGMSFWI/kadu2018SEGMSFWI.pdf},
	author = {Ajinkya Kadu and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {peters2016SEGprs,
	title = {Parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1411-1415},
	abstract = {This abstract is about reducing the total computation time to solve full-waveform inversion problems. A common problem formulation is a nonlinear least-squares problem where the gradient is computed using the adjoint-state algorithm. This formulation offers parallelism for the computation of gradients for different sources and frequencies. The adjoint-state algorithm itself is sequential however and this is a limiting factor when a lot of compute nodes are available and only a few wavefields need to be computed. This situation occurs when stochastic optimization strategies are used to minimize the objective function. We present a parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state algorithm, which allows the forward- and adjoint wavefields to be computed in parallel. Both algorithms are mathematically equivalent but the parallel version is twice as fast in run time. An important characteristic of the proposed algorithm is that one wavefield needs to be computed per source and one per receiver. These fields can be used to apply the (inverse) Gauss-Newton Hessian to a vector without recomputing wavefields. A 2D example shows that good full-waveform inversion results are obtained, even when a small number of sources and receivers is used.},
	keywords = {FWI, numerical linear algebra, parallel computing, PDE-constrained optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13966771.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014SEGWS,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) {\textendash} a new take on wave-equation based inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Full Waveform Inversion - Elastic Approaches and Issues with Anisotropy, Nonshallow Inversion, Poor Starting Model; Denver},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Denver)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/herrmann2014SEGWSwri/herrmann2014SEGWSwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Bas Peters}
}
@article {VanLeeuwen11TRfwiwse,
	title = {Fast waveform inversion without source encoding},
	journal = {Geophysical Prospecting},
	volume = {61},
	year = {2013},
	note = {Article first published online: 10 JULY 2012},
	month = {06},
	pages = {10-19},
	abstract = {Randomized source encoding has recently been proposed as a way to dramatically reduce the costs of full waveform inversion. The main idea is to replace all sequential sources by a small number of simultaneous sources. This introduces random crosstalk in the model updates and special stochastic optimization strategies are required to deal with this. Two problems arise with this approach: i) source encoding can only be applied to fixed-spread acquisition setups, and ii) stochastic optimization methods tend to converge very slowly, relying on averaging to get rid of the cross-talk. Although the slow convergence is partly offset by the low iteration cost, we show that conventional optimization strategies are bound to outperform stochastic methods in the long run. In this paper we argue that we don{\textlnot}{\o}t need randomized source encoding to reap the benefits of stochastic optimization and we review an optimization strategy that combines the benefits of both conventional and stochastic optimization. The method uses a gradually increasing batch of sources. Thus, iterations are very cheap initially and this allows the method to make fast progress in the beginning. As the batch size grows, the method behaves like conventional optimization, allowing for fast convergence. Numerical examples suggest that the stochastic and hybrid method perform equally well with and without source encoding and that the hybrid method outperforms both conventional and stochastic optimization. The method does not rely on source encoding techniques and can thus be applied to non fixed-spread data.},
	keywords = {FWI, Optimization, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01096.x},
	url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01096.x/abstract},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/GeophysicalProspecting/2013/VanLeeuwen11TRfwiwse/VanLeeuwen11TRfwiwse.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {Li11TRfrfwi,
	title = {Fast randomized full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {77},
	number = {3},
	year = {2012},
	month = {05},
	pages = {A13-A17},
	abstract = {Wave-equation based seismic inversion can be formulated as a nonlinear inverse problem where the medium properties are obtained via minimization of a least- squares misfit functional. The demand for higher resolution models in more geologically complex areas drives the need to develop techniques that explore the special structure of full-waveform inversion to reduce the computational burden and to regularize the inverse problem. We meet these goals by using ideas from compressive sensing and stochastic optimization to design a novel Gauss-Newton method, where the updates are computed from random subsets of the data via curvelet-domain sparsity promotion. Application of this idea to a realistic synthetic shows improved results compared to quasi-Newton methods, which require passes through all data. Two different subset sampling strategies are considered: randomized source encoding, and drawing sequential shots firing at random source locations from marine data with missing near and far offsets. In both cases, we obtain excellent inversion results compared to conventional methods at reduced computational costs.},
	keywords = {Compressive Sensing, FWI, Optimization, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/geo2011-0410.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2012/Li11TRfrfwi/Li11TRfrfwi.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2012SEGfwi,
	title = {FWI from the West Coasts: lessons learned from "Gulf of Mexico Imaging Challenges: What Can Full Waveform Inversion Achieve?"},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on FWI; Las Vegas},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/herrmann2012SEGfwi/herrmann2012SEGfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li and Brendan R. Smithyman and Eric Takam Takougang and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {Aravkin11TRridr,
	title = {Robust inversion, dimensionality reduction, and randomized sampling},
	journal = {Mathematical Programming},
	volume = {134},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {08},
	pages = {101-125},
	abstract = {We consider a class of inverse problems in which the forward model is the solution operator to linear ODEs or PDEs. This class admits several dimensionality-reduction techniques based on data averaging or sampling, which are especially useful for large-scale problems. We survey these approaches and their connection to stochastic optimization. The data-averaging approach is only viable, however, for a least-squares misfit, which is sensitive to outliers in the data and artifacts unexplained by the forward model. This motivates us to propose a robust formulation based on the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution of the error. We demonstrate how the corresponding penalty function, together with the sampling approach, can obtain good results for a large-scale seismic inverse problem with 50 \% corrupted data.},
	keywords = {FWI, Inverse problems, Optimization, Robust estimation, Seismic inversion, Stochastic optimization},
	doi = {10.1007/s10107-012-0571-6},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/35rwr101h5736340/},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/MathematicalProgramming/aravkin2012MPrid/aravkin2012MPrid.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Michael P. Friedlander and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@article {vanLeeuwen2010IJGswi,
	title = {Seismic waveform inversion by stochastic optimization},
	journal = {International Journal of Geophysics},
	volume = {2011},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Article ID: 689041, 18pages},
	month = {12},
	abstract = {We explore the use of stochastic optimization methods for seismic waveform inversion. The basic principle of such methods is to randomly draw a batch of realizations of a given misfit function and goes back to the 1950s. The ultimate goal of such an approach is to dramatically reduce the computational cost involved in evaluating the misfit. Following earlier work, we introduce the stochasticity in waveform inversion problem in a rigorous way via a technique called randomized trace estimation. We then review theoretical results that underlie recent developments in the use of stochastic methods for waveform inversion. We present numerical experiments to illustrate the behavior of different types of stochastic optimization methods and investigate the sensitivity to the batch size and the noise level in the data. We find that it is possible to reproduce results that are qualitatively similar to the solution of the full problem with modest batch sizes, even on noisy data. Each iteration of the corresponding stochastic methods requires an order of magnitude fewer PDE solves than a comparable deterministic method applied to the full problem, which may lead to an order of magnitude speedup for waveform inversion in practice.},
	keywords = {FWI, Optimization, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1155/2011/689041},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/InternationJournalOfGeophysics/2011/vanLeeuwen10IJGswi/vanLeeuwen10IJGswi.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
