@article {vanleeuwen2015GPWEMVA,
	title = {Enabling affordable omnidirectional subsurface extended image volumes via probing},
	journal = {Geophysical Prospecting},
	volume = {65},
	number = {2},
	year = {2017},
	note = {(Geophysical Prospecting)},
	month = {03},
	pages = {385-406},
	abstract = {Image gathers as a function of subsurface offset are an important tool for the inference of rock properties and velocity analysis in areas of complex geology. Traditionally, these gathers are thought of as multidimensional correlations of the source and receiver wavefields. The bottleneck in computing these gathers lies in the fact that one needs to store, compute, and correlate these wavefields for all shots in order to obtain the desired image gathers. Therefore, the image gathers are typically only computed for a limited number of subsurface points and for a limited range of subsurface offsets, which may cause problems in complex geological areas with large geologic dips. We overcome increasing computational and storage costs of extended image volumes by introducing a formulation that avoids explicit storage and removes the customary and expensive loop over shots found in conventional extended imaging. As a result, we end up with a matrix{\textendash}vector formulation from which different image gathers can be formed and with which amplitude-versus-angle and wave-equation migration velocity analysis can be performed without requiring prior information on the geologic dips. Aside from demonstrating the formation of two-way extended image gathers for different purposes and at greatly reduced costs, we also present a new approach to conduct automatic wave-equation-based migration-velocity analysis. Instead of focusing in particular offset directions and preselected subsets of subsurface points, our method focuses every subsurface point for all subsurface offset directions using a randomized probing technique. As a consequence, we obtain good velocity models at low cost for complex models without the need to provide information on the geologic dips.},
	keywords = {AVA, migration velocity analysis, Stochastic optimization},
	doi = {10.1111/1365-2478.12418},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/GeophysicalProspecting/2016/vanleeuwen2015GPWEMVA/vanleeuwen2015GPWEMVA.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Rajiv Kumar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {Aravkin11TRridr,
	title = {Robust inversion, dimensionality reduction, and randomized sampling},
	journal = {Mathematical Programming},
	volume = {134},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {08},
	pages = {101-125},
	abstract = {We consider a class of inverse problems in which the forward model is the solution operator to linear ODEs or PDEs. This class admits several dimensionality-reduction techniques based on data averaging or sampling, which are especially useful for large-scale problems. We survey these approaches and their connection to stochastic optimization. The data-averaging approach is only viable, however, for a least-squares misfit, which is sensitive to outliers in the data and artifacts unexplained by the forward model. This motivates us to propose a robust formulation based on the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution of the error. We demonstrate how the corresponding penalty function, together with the sampling approach, can obtain good results for a large-scale seismic inverse problem with 50 \% corrupted data.},
	keywords = {FWI, Inverse problems, Optimization, Robust estimation, Seismic inversion, Stochastic optimization},
	doi = {10.1007/s10107-012-0571-6},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/35rwr101h5736340/},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/MathematicalProgramming/aravkin2012MPrid/aravkin2012MPrid.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Michael P. Friedlander and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
