@presentation {esser2015SINBADasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textemdash} Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	year = {2015},
	note = {posthumously presented by Felix J. Herrmann},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/esser2015SINBADasd/esser2015SINBADasd.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2015SINBADFasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textemdash} Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/esser2015SINBADFasd/esser2015SINBADFasd.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/esser2015SINBADFasd/esser2015SINBADFasd.mov},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {esser2015SEGasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textendash}- Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG, New Orleans)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1337-1343},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {convex constraints, Full-waveform inversion, salt, SEG, total-variation norm},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2015-5877995.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {esser2015SEGWSasf,
	title = {Automatic salt flooding with hinged FWI},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Subsalt model buiding long to short wavelengths; New Orleans},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG, New Orleans)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {SEG, waveform inversion, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGWSasf/esser2015SEGWSasf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {esser2014EAGEacp,
	title = {Application of a convex phase retrieval method to blind seismic deconvolution},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {A classical strategy for blind seismic deconvolution is to first estimate the autocorrelation of the unknown source wavelet from the data and then recover the wavelet by assuming it has minimum phase. However, computing the minimum phase wavelet directly from the amplitude spectrum can be sensitive to even extremely small errors, especially in the coefficients close to zero. Since the minimum phase requirement follows from an assumption that the wavelet should be as impulsive as possible, we propose to directly estimate an impulsive wavelet by minimizing a weighted l2 penalty subject to a constraint on its amplitude spectrum. This nonconvex model has the form of a phase retrieval problem, in this case recovering a signal given only estimates of the magnitudes of its Fourier coefficients. Following recent work on convex relaxations of phase retrieval problems, we propose a convex semidefinite program for computing an impulsive minimum phase wavelet whose amplitude spectrum is close to a given estimate, and we show that this can be robustly solved by a Douglas Rachford splitting method for convex optimization.},
	keywords = {blind deconvolution, convex phase retrieval, EAGE, source wavelet estimation},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20141590},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/esser2014EAGEacp/esser2014EAGEacp.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/esser2014EAGEacp/esser2014EAGEacp_poster.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2013SINBADasr,
	title = {Applications of phase retrieval methods to blind seismic deconvolution},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Phase retrieval is the non-convex optimization problem of recovering a signal from magnitudes of complex linear measurements. Solving convex semi-definite program (SDP) relaxations has been shown to be a robust approach, but it remains too expensive to apply to large problems. We will discuss methods for accelerating computations and explore applications to seismic deconvolution.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/esser2013SINBADasr/esser2013SINBADasr.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
