@article {herrmann2008GEOPcbs,
	title = {Curvelet-based seismic data processing: a multiscale and nonlinear approach},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {73},
	number = {1},
	year = {2008},
	month = {03},
	pages = {A1-A5},
	publisher = {SEG},
	abstract = {Mitigating missing data, multiples, and erroneous migration amplitudes are key factors that determine image quality. Curvelets, little {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}plane waves,{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} complete with oscillations in one direction and smoothness in the other directions, sparsify a property we leverage explicitly with sparsity promotion. With this principle, we recover seismic data with high fidelity from a small subset (20\%) of randomly selected traces. Similarly, sparsity leads to a natural decorrelation and hence to a robust curvelet-domain primary-multiple separation for North Sea data. Finally, sparsity helps to recover migration amplitudes from noisy data. With these examples, we show that exploiting the curvelet{\textquoteright}s ability to sparsify wavefrontlike features is powerful, and our results are a clear indication of the broad applicability of this transform to exploration seismology. \copyright2008 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Acquisition, curvelet transform, Processing, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2799517},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2008/herrmann08GEOcbs/herrmann08GEOcbs.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Deli Wang and Gilles Hennenfent and Peyman P. Moghaddam}
}
@article {hennenfent2008GEOPnii,
	title = {New insights into one-norm solvers from the Pareto curve},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {73},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	month = {07},
	pages = {A23-A26},
	abstract = {Geophysical inverse problems typically involve a trade off between data misfit and some prior. Pareto curves trace the optimal trade off between these two competing aims. These curves are commonly used in problems with two-norm priors where they are plotted on a log-log scale and are known as L-curves. For other priors, such as the sparsity-promoting one norm, Pareto curves remain relatively unexplored. We show how these curves lead to new insights in one-norm regularization. First, we confirm the theoretical properties of smoothness and convexity of these curves from a stylized and a geophysical example. Second, we exploit these crucial properties to approximate the Pareto curve for a large-scale problem. Third, we show how Pareto curves provide an objective criterion to gauge how different one-norm solvers advance towards the solution.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, Geophysics, Optimization, Pareto, Processing, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2944169},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2008/hennenfent08GEOnii/hennenfent08GEOnii.pdf},
	author = {Gilles Hennenfent and Ewout van den Berg and Michael P. Friedlander and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@article {herrmann2008GJInps,
	title = {Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames},
	journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
	volume = {173},
	year = {2008},
	month = {04},
	pages = {233-248},
	abstract = {Seismic data recovery from data with missing traces on otherwise regular acquisition grids forms a crucial step in the seismic processing flow. For instance, unsuccessful recovery leads to imaging artifacts and to erroneous predictions for the multiples, adversely affecting the performance of multiple elimination. A non-parametric transform-based recovery method is presented that exploits the compression of seismic data volumes by recently developed curvelet frames. The elements of this transform are multidimensional and directional and locally resemble wavefronts present in the data, which leads to a compressible representation for seismic data. This compression enables us to formulate a new curvelet-based seismic data recovery algorithm through sparsity-promoting inversion. The concept of sparsity-promoting inversion is in itself not new to geophysics. However, the recent insights from the field of {\textquoteleft}compressed sensing{\textquoteright} are new since they clearly identify the three main ingredients that go into a successful formulation of a recovery problem, namely a sparsifying transform, a sampling strategy that subdues coherent aliases and a sparsity-promoting program that recovers the largest entries of the curvelet-domain vector while explaining the measurements. These concepts are illustrated with a stylized experiment that stresses the importance of the degree of compression by the sparsifying transform. With these findings, a curvelet-based recovery algorithms is developed, which recovers seismic wavefields from seismic data volumes with large percentages of traces missing. During this construction, we benefit from the main three ingredients of compressive sampling, namely the curvelet compression of seismic data, the existence of a favorable sampling scheme and the formulation of a large-scale sparsity-promoting solver based on a cooling method. The recovery performs well on synthetic as well as real data and performs better by virtue of the sparsifying property of curvelets. Our results are applicable to other areas such as global seismology.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, curvelet transform, reconstruction, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03698.x},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/GeophysicalJournalInternational/2008/herrmann2008GJInps.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Gilles Hennenfent}
}
@article {hennenfent2008GEOPsdw,
	title = {Simply denoise: wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling},
	journal = {Geophysics},
	volume = {73},
	number = {3},
	year = {2008},
	month = {05},
	pages = {V19-V28},
	publisher = {SEG},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present a new discrete undersampling scheme designed to favor wavefield reconstruction by sparsity-promoting inversion with transform elements that are localized in the Fourier domain. Our work is motivated by empirical observations in the seismic community, corroborated by recent results from compressive sampling, which indicate favorable (wavefield) reconstructions from random as opposed to regular undersampling. As predicted by theory, random undersampling renders coherent aliases into harmless incoherent random noise, effectively turning the interpolation problem into a much simpler denoising problem. A practical requirement of wavefield reconstruction with localized sparsifying transforms is the control on the maximum gap size. Unfortunately, random undersampling does not provide such a control and the main purpose of this paper is to introduce a sampling scheme, coined jittered undersampling, that shares the benefits of random sampling, while offering control on the maximum gap size. Our contribution of jittered sub-Nyquist sampling proves to be key in the formulation of a versatile wavefield sparsity-promoting recovery scheme that follows the principles of compressive sampling. After studying the behavior of the jittered undersampling scheme in the Fourier domain, its performance is studied for curvelet recovery by sparsity-promoting inversion (CRSI). Our findings on synthetic and real seismic data indicate an improvement of several decibels over recovery from regularly-undersampled data for the same amount of data collected.},
	keywords = {Acquisition, Compressive Sensing, Geophysics, Optimization, Processing, sampling, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2841038},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2008/hennenfent08GEOsdw/hennenfent08GEOsdw.pdf},
	html_version = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Journals/Geophysics/2008/hennenfent08GEOsdw/paper_html/paper.html},
	author = {Gilles Hennenfent and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
