@presentation {almatar2010SINBADesf,
	title = {Estimation of surface-free data by curvelet-domain matched filtering and sparse inversion},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2010, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2010/Fall/almatar2010SINBADesf/almatar2010SINBADesf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Mufeed H. AlMatar}
}
@mastersthesis {almatar10THesd,
	title = {Estimation of surface-free data by curvelet-domain matched filtering and sparse inversion},
	year = {2010},
	note = {(MSc)},
	month = {12},
	school = {The University of British Columbia},
	type = {masters},
	address = {Vancouver},
	abstract = {A recent robust multiple-elimination technique, based on the underlying principle that relates primary impulse response to total upgoing wavefield, tries to change the paradigm that sees surface-related multiples as noise that needs to be removed from the data prior to imaging. This technique, estimation of primaries by sparse inversion (EPSI), (van Groenestijn and Verschuur, 2009; Lin and Herrmann, 2009), proposes an inversion procedure during which the source function and surface- free impulse response are directly calculated from the upgoing wavefield using an alternating optimization procedure. EPSI hinges on a delicate interplay between surface-related multiples and pri- maries. Finite aperture and other imperfections may violate this relationship. In this thesis, we investigate how to make EPSI more robust by incorporating curvelet-domain matching in its formulation. Compared to surface-related multiple removal (SRME), where curvelet-domain matching was used successfully, incorporating this step has the additional advantage that matches multiples to multiples rather than predicated multiples to total data as in SRME.},
	keywords = {MSc},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Thesis/2010/almatar10THesd.pdf},
	author = {Mufeed H. AlMatar}
}
@techreport {almatar10SEGesfd,
	title = {Estimation of surface-free data by curvelet-domain matched filtering and sparse inversion},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2010-1},
	year = {2010},
	institution = {Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences},
	address = {University of British Columbia, Vancouver},
	abstract = {Matching seismic wavefields and images lies at the heart of many pre-post-processing steps part of seismic imaging- whether one is matching predicted wavefield components, such as multiples, to the actual to-be-separated wavefield components present in the data or whether one is aiming to restore migration amplitudes by scaling, using an image-to-remigrated- image matching procedure to calculate the scaling coefficients. The success of these wavefield matching procedures depends on our ability to (i) control possible overfitting, which may lead to accidental removal of energy or to inaccurate image-amplitude corrections, (ii) handle data or images with nonunique dips, and (iii) apply subsequent wavefield separations or migraton amplitude corrections stably. In this paper, we show that the curvelet transform allows us to address all these issues by im- posing smoothness in phase space, by using their capability to handle conflicting dips, and by leveraging their ability to represent seismic data and images sparsely. This latter property renders curvelet-domain sparsity promotion an effective prior.},
	keywords = {SEG},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2010/almatar10SEGesfd/almatar10SEGesfd.pdf},
	author = {Mufeed H. AlMatar and Tim T.Y. Lin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
