@conference {orozco2022SPIEadjoint,
	title = {Adjoint operators enable fast and amortized machine learning based Bayesian uncertainty quantification},
	booktitle = {SPIE Medical Imaging Conference},
	year = {2023},
	note = {(SPIE, San Diego)},
	month = {02},
	abstract = {Machine learning algorithms such as Normalizing Flows, VAEs, and GANs are powerful tools in Bayesian uncertainty quantification (UQ) of inverse problems. Unfortunately, when using these algorithms medical imaging practitioners are faced with the challenging task of manually defining neural networks that can handle complicated inputs such as acoustic data. This task needs to be replicated for different receiver types or configurations since these change the dimensionality of the input. We propose to first transform the data using the adjoint operator {\textemdash}ex: time reversal in photoacoustic imaging (PAI) or back-projection in computer tomography (CT) imaging {\textemdash} then continue posterior inference using the adjoint data as an input now that it has been standardized to the size of the unknown model. This adjoint preprocessing technique has been used in previous works but with minimal discussion on if it is biased. In this work, we prove that conditioning on adjoint data is unbiased for a certain class of inverse problems. We then demonstrate with two medical imaging examples (PAI and CT) that adjoints enable two things: Firstly, adjoints partially undo the physics of the forward operator resulting in faster convergence of an ML based Bayesian UQ technique. Secondly, the algorithm is now robust to changes in the observed data caused by differing transducer subsampling in PAI and number of angles in CT. Our adjoint-based Bayesian inference method results in point estimates that are faster to compute than traditional baselines and show higher SSIM metrics, while also providing validated UQ.},
	keywords = {Amortized Inference, Bayesian inference, deep learning, Inverse problems, machine learning, medical imaging, Normalizing flows, SPIE, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SPIE/2023/orozco2022SPIEadjoint/SPIE_2022_adjoint.html},
	author = {Rafael Orozco and Ali Siahkoohi and Gabrio Rizzuti and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {orozco2023MIDLanf,
	title = {Amortized normalizing flows for transcranial ultrasound with uncertainty quantification},
	booktitle = {Medical Imaging with Deep Learning},
	year = {2023},
	note = {(MIDL, Nashville)},
	month = {07},
	abstract = {We present a novel approach to transcranial ultrasound computed tomography that utilizes normalizing flows to improve the speed of imaging and provide Bayesian uncertainty quantification. Our method combines physics-informed methods and data-driven methods to accelerate the reconstruction of the final image. We make use of a physics-informed summary statistic to incorporate the known ultrasound physics with the goal of compressing large incoming observations. This compression enables efficient training of the normalizing flow and standardizes the size of the data regardless of imaging configurations. The combinations of these methods results in fast uncertainty-aware image reconstruction that generalizes to a variety of transducer configurations. We evaluate our approach with in silico experiments and demonstrate that it can significantly improve the imaging speed while quantifying uncertainty. We validate the quality of our image reconstructions by comparing against the traditional physics-only method and also verify that our provided uncertainty is calibrated with the error.},
	keywords = {Bayesian Estimation, invertible networks, medical imaging, MIDL, Physics and Machine Learning Hybrid, Uncertainty quantification},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/MIDL/2023/orozco2023MIDLanf/paper.pdf},
	author = {Rafael Orozco and Mathias Louboutin and Ali Siahkoohi and Gabrio Rizzuti and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {orozco2021NIPSpicp,
	title = {Photoacoustic Imaging with Conditional Priors from Normalizing Flows},
	booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)},
	year = {2021},
	note = {(NIPS, virtual)},
	month = {12},
	abstract = {Photoacoustic imaging is a biomedical imaging technique based on the photoacoustic effect. It leverages the interplay between optics and acoustics as a mean to circumvent the limitations of imaging modalities relying on single-type physics. Light beams generated by a pulsed laser can penetrate biological tissues by several centimeters, and are absorbed based on oxygen saturation or hemoglobin concentration. While optical absorption is in principle an ideal parameter for medical imaging (e.g., with respect to the detection of cancerous tissue), strong scattering imposes important limitations in its imaging resolution. Ultrasonics, on the other hand, can theoretically provide resolution of medical diagnostic value, but produce images of mechanical properties whose contrasts are not sensitive. In photoacoustics, optical and acoustic effects are combined to gain the best of both worlds. Under conditions of thermal and stress confinement, thermal energy can efficiently build up in biological tissues, which in turn undergo thermal expansion and effectively act as a spatially distributed acoustic source. In photoacoustic imaging, the actual object of interest is the induced source, as it is directly related to optical absorption and can be recovered with a relatively higher resolution than pure optical imaging, based on the acquired ultrasonic data.},
	keywords = {conditional prior, deep image, MAP, NIPS, normalizing flow, Photoacoustic, Variational Inference},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/NIPS/2021/orozco2021NIPSpicp/deep_inverse_2021.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/NIPS/2021/orozco2021NIPSpicp/posterneurips2021_orozco.pdf},
	url2 = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=woi1OTvROO1},
	software = {https://github.com/slimgroup/InvertibleNetworks.jl},
	author = {Rafael Orozco and Ali Siahkoohi and Gabrio Rizzuti and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {siahkoohi2019SEGsrm,
	title = {Surface-related multiple elimination with deep learning},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SEG, San Antonio)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4629-4634},
	abstract = {We explore the potential of neural networks in approximating the action of the computationally expensive Estimation of Primaries by Sparse Inversion (EPSI) algorithm, applied to real data, via a supervised learning algorithm. We show that given suitable training data, consisting of a relatively cheap prediction of multiples and pairs of shot records with and without surface-related multiples, obtained via EPSI, a well-trained neural network is capable of providing an approximation to the action of the EPSI algorithm. We perform our numerical experiment on the field Nelson data set. Our results demonstrate that the quality of the multiple elimination via our neural network improves compared to the case where we only feed the network with shot records with surface-related multiples. We take these benefits by supplying the neural network with a relatively poor prediction of the multiples, e.g. obtained by a relatively cheap single step of Surface-Related Multiple Elimination.},
	keywords = {EPSI, machine learning, SEG, SRME},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2019-3216723.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ali Siahkoohi and Dirk J. Verschuur and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kadu2018SEGMSFWI,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion with Mumford-Shah regularization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1258-1262},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a non-linear procedure to es- timate subsurface rock parameters from surface measurements of induced seismic waves. This procedure is ill-posed in nature and hence, requires regularization to enhance some structure depending on the prior information. Recently, Total-variation (TV) regularization has gained popularity due to its ability to produce blocky structures. Contrary to this, the earth behave more like a piecewise smooth function. TV regularization fails to enforce this prior information into FWI. We propose a Mumford-Shah functional to incorporate the piecewise smooth spatial structure in the FWI procedure. The resulting opti- mization problem is solved by a splitting method. We show the improvement in results against TV regularization on two synthetic camembert examples.},
	keywords = {FWI, Mumford-Shah, regularization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2997224.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/kadu2018SEGMSFWI/kadu2018SEGMSFWI.pdf},
	author = {Ajinkya Kadu and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {kumar2018SEGlreiv,
	title = {Low-rank representation of extended image volumes{\textendash}{\textendash}applications to imaging and velocity continuation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {4418-4422},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present a cost-effective low-rank factorized form of computing the full subsurface extended image volumes without explicitly calculating the receiver wavefields. The propose approach is computationally feasible, which exploits the low-rank structure of full subsurface extended image volumes organized as a matrix, thus avoiding the customary loop over sources. Using carefully selected stylized examples, we show how conventional migration images can be extracted from the low-rank factorized form. We also present a velocity continuation procedure that uses the same low-rank form and allows us to map the extended image for one velocity model to another velocity model without recomputing all the source wavefields.},
	keywords = {image volume, low-rank, SEG, velocity continuation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2998404.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/kumar2018SEGlreiv/kumar2018SEGlreiv.html},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Marie Graff-Kray and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {lange2016dtg,
	title = {Devito: Towards a generic finite difference DSL using symbolic python},
	booktitle = {6th Workshop on Python for High-Performance and Scientific Computing},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(PyHPC, Utah)},
	month = {11},
	pages = {67-75},
	abstract = {Domain specific languages (DSL) have been used in a variety of fields to express complex scientific problems in a concise manner and provide automated performance optimization for a range of computational architectures. As such DSLs provide a powerful mechanism to speed up scientific Python computation that goes beyond traditional vectorization and pre-compilation approaches, while allowing domain scientists to build applications within the comforts of the Python software ecosystem. In this paper we present Devito, a new finite difference DSL that provides optimized stencil computation from high-level problem specifications based on symbolic Python expressions. We demonstrate Devito{\textquoteright}s symbolic API and performance advantages over traditional Python acceleration methods before highlighting its use in the scientific context of seismic inversion problems.},
	keywords = {acoustic, finite differences, HPC, inversion, Modelling, python, software optimization},
	doi = {10.1109/PyHPC.2016.9},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/PyHPC/2016/lange2016dtg/lange2016dtg.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/PyHPC/2016/lange2016dtg/lange2016dtg_pres.pdf},
	author = {Michael Lange and Navjot Kukreja and Mathias Louboutin and Fabio Luporini and Felippe Vieira Zacarias and Vincenzo Pandolfo and Paulius Velesko and Paulius Kazakas and Gerard Gorman}
}
@conference {peters2016SEGprs,
	title = {Parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1411-1415},
	abstract = {This abstract is about reducing the total computation time to solve full-waveform inversion problems. A common problem formulation is a nonlinear least-squares problem where the gradient is computed using the adjoint-state algorithm. This formulation offers parallelism for the computation of gradients for different sources and frequencies. The adjoint-state algorithm itself is sequential however and this is a limiting factor when a lot of compute nodes are available and only a few wavefields need to be computed. This situation occurs when stochastic optimization strategies are used to minimize the objective function. We present a parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state algorithm, which allows the forward- and adjoint wavefields to be computed in parallel. Both algorithms are mathematically equivalent but the parallel version is twice as fast in run time. An important characteristic of the proposed algorithm is that one wavefield needs to be computed per source and one per receiver. These fields can be used to apply the (inverse) Gauss-Newton Hessian to a vector without recomputing wavefields. A 2D example shows that good full-waveform inversion results are obtained, even when a small number of sources and receivers is used.},
	keywords = {FWI, numerical linear algebra, parallel computing, PDE-constrained optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13966771.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2016SEGspj,
	title = {Sparsity-promoting joint microseismic source collocation and source-time function estimation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2574-2579},
	abstract = {In this work, we propose a new method to simultaneously locate microseismic events (e.g., induced by hydraulic fracturing) and estimate the source signature of these events. We use the method of linearized Bregman. This algorithm focuses unknown sources at their true locations by promoting sparsity along space and at the same time keeping the energy along time in check. We are particularly interested in situations where the microseismic data is noisy, sources have different signatures and we only have access to the smooth background-velocity model. We perform numerical experiments to demonstrate the usability of the proposed method. We also compare our results with full-waveform inversion based microseismic event collocation methods. Our method gives flexibility to simultaneously get a more accurate source image along with an estimate of the source-time function, which carries important information on the rupturing process and source mechanism.},
	keywords = {microseismic, noise, SEG, sources, sparse, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13871022.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/sharan2016SEGspj/sharan2016SEGspj.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/sharan2016SEGspj/sharan2016SEGspj_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rongrong Wang and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {fang2016SEGuqw,
	title = {Uncertainty quantification for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion using a PDE free semidefinite Hessian and randomize-then-optimize method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1390-1394},
	abstract = {The data of full-waveform inversion often contains noise, which induces uncertainties in the inversion results. Ideally, one would like to run a number of independent inversions with different realizations of the noise and assess model-side uncertainties from the resulting models, however this is not feasible because we collect the data only once. To circumvent this restriction, various sampling schemes have been devised to generate an ensemble of models that fit the data to within the noise level. Such sampling schemes typically involve running multiple inversions or evaluating the Hessian of the cost function, both of which are computationally expensive. In this work, we propose a new method to quantify uncertainties based on a novel formulation of the full-waveform inversion problem {\textendash} wavefield reconstruction inversion. Based on this formulation, we formulate a semidefinite approximation of the corresponding Hessian matrix. By precomputing certain quantities, we are able to apply this Hessian to given input vectors without additional solutions of the underlying partial differential equations. To generate a sample, we solve an auxiliary stochastic optimization problem involving this Hessian. The result is a computationally feasible method that, with little overhead, can generate as many samples as required at small additional cost. We test our method on the synthetic BG Compass model and compare the results to a direct-sampling approach. The results show the feasibility of applying our method to computing statistical quantities such as the mean and standard deviation in the context of wavefield reconstruction inversion.},
	keywords = {SEG, Uncertainty quantification, WRI},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13879108.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/fang2016SEGuqw/fang2016SEGuqw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/fang2016SEGuqw/fang2016SEGuqw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Chia Ying Lee and Curt Da Silva and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2015EAGEafs,
	title = {Affordable full subsurface image volume{\textendash}-an application to WEMVA},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(EAGE Workshop on Wave Equation based Migration Velocity Analysis, Madrid)},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Common image gathers are used in building velocity models, inverting for anisotropy parameters, and analyzing reservoir attributes. In this paper, we offer a new perspective on image gathers, where we glean information from the image volume via efficient matrix-vector products. The proposed formulation make the computation of full subsurface image volume feasible. We illustrate how this matrix-vector product can be used to construct objective functions for automatic MVA.},
	keywords = {EAGE, MVA, randomized trace estimation, wave-equation},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.201413498},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/vanleeuwen2015EAGEafs/vanleeuwen2015EAGEafs.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2015/vanleeuwen2015EAGEafs/vanleeuwen2015EAGEafs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Rajiv Kumar and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {esser2015SEGasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textendash}- Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG, New Orleans)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1337-1343},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {convex constraints, Full-waveform inversion, salt, SEG, total-variation norm},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2015-5877995.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kumar2015CSEGlse,
	title = {Least-squares extended imaging with surface-related multiples},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(CSEG, Calgary)},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Common image gathers are used in building velocity models, inverting anisotropy parameters, and analyzing reservoir attributes. Often primary reflections are used to form image gathers and multiples are typically attenuated in processing to remove strong coherent artifacts generated by multiples that interfere with the imaged reflectors. However, researchers have shown that, if correctly used, multiples can actually provide extra illumination of the subsurface in seismic imaging, especially for delineating the near-surface features. In this work, we borrow ideas from literatures on imaging with surface-related multiples, and apply these ideas to extended imaging. This way we save the massive computation cost in separating multiples from the data before using them during the formation of image gathers. Also, we mitigate the strong coherent artifacts generated by multiples which can send the migration velocity analysis type algorithms in wrong direction. Synthetic examples on a three-layer model show the efficacy of the proposed formulation.},
	keywords = {CSEG, image-gather, surface-related multiples},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2015/kumar2015CSEGlse/kumar2015CSEGlse.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2015/kumar2015CSEGlse/kumar2015CSEGlse_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Ning Tu and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {petrenko2014EAGEaih,
	title = {Accelerating an iterative Helmholtz solver with FPGAs},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We implement the Kaczmarz row-projection algorithm (Kaczmarz (1937)) on a CPU host + FPGA accelerator platform using techniques of dataflow programming. This algorithm is then used as the preconditioning step in CGMN, a modified version of the conjugate gradients method (Bj{\"o}rck and Elfving (1979)) that we use to solve the time-harmonic acoustic isotropic constant density wave equation. Using one accelerator we achieve a speed-up of over 2{\texttimes} compared with one Intel core.},
	keywords = {CGMN, EAGE, FPGA, Helmholtz equation, Kaczmarz, reconfigurable computing},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20141141},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/petrenko2014EAGEaih/petrenko2014EAGEaih.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/petrenko2014EAGEaih/petrenko2014EAGEaih_pres.pdf},
	author = {Art Petrenko and Tristan van Leeuwen and Diego Oriato and Simon Tilbury and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {petrenko2014OGHPCaih,
	title = {Accelerating an iterative Helmholtz solver with FPGAs},
	booktitle = {OGHPC},
	year = {2014},
	month = {03},
	abstract = {We implement the Kaczmarz row-projection algorithm [Kaczmarz, 1937] on a CPU host + FPGA accelerator platform using techniques of dataflow programming. This algorithm is then used as the preconditioning step in CGMN, a modified version of the conjugate gradients method [Bj?rck and Elfving, 1979] that we use to solve the time-harmonic acoustic isotropic constant density wave equation.},
	keywords = {CGMN, FPGA, Helmholtz equation, Kaczmarz, OGHPC, reconfigurable computing},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/OGHPC/2014/petrenko2014OGHPCaih/petrenko2014OGHPCaih.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/OGHPC/2014/petrenko2014OGHPCaih/petrenko2014OGHPCaih_poster.pdf},
	author = {Art Petrenko and Felix J. Herrmann and Diego Oriato and Simon Tilbury and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {kumar2014EAGEeia,
	title = {Extended images in action: efficient WEMVA via randomized probing},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Image gathers as a function of subsurface offset are an important tool for velocity analysis in areas of complex geology. In this paper, we offer a new perspective on image gathers by organizing the extended image as a function of all subsurface offsets and all subsurface points into a matrix whose (i,j)^th entry captures the interaction between gridpoints i and j. For even small problems, it is infeasible to form and store this matrix. Instead, we propose an efficient algorithm to glean information from the image volume via efficient matrix-vector products. We illustrate how this can be used to construct objective functions for automatic MVA.},
	keywords = {EAGE, extended imaging, MVA, probing},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20141492},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/kumar2014EAGEeia/kumar2014EAGEeia.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/kumar2014EAGEeia/kumar2014EAGEeia_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {leeuwen2014EAGEntf,
	title = {A new take on FWI: wavefield reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {We discuss a recently proposed novel method for waveform inversion: Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI). As opposed to conventional FWI {\textendash} which attempts to minimize the error between observed and predicted data obtained by solving a wave equation {\textendash} WRI reconstructs a wave-field from the data and extracts a model-update from this wavefield by minimizing the wave-equation residual. The method does not require explicit computation of an adjoint wavefield as all the necessary information is contained in the reconstructed wavefield. We show how the corresponding model updates can be interpreted physically analogously to the conventional imaging-condition-based approach.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, penalty method, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20140703},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/leeuwen2014EAGEntf/leeuwen2014EAGEntf.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/leeuwen2014EAGEntf/leeuwen2014EAGEntf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {peters2014EAGEweb,
	title = {Wave-equation based inversion with the penalty method: adjoint-state versus wavefield-reconstruction inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In this paper we make a comparison between wave-equation based inversions based on the adjoint-state and penalty methods. While the adjoint-state method involves the minimization of a data-misfit and exact solutions of the wave-equation for the current velocity model, the penalty-method aims to first find a wavefield that jointly fits the data and honours the physics, in a least-squares sense. Given this reconstructed wavefield, which is a proxy for the true wavefield in the true model, we calculate updates for the velocity model. Aside from being less nonlinear{\textendash}the acoustic wave equation is linear in the wavefield and model parameters but not in both{\textendash}the inversion is carried out over a solution space that includes both the model and the wavefield. This larger search space allows the algortihm to circumnavigate local minima, very much in the same way as recently proposed model extentions try to acomplish. We include examples for low frequencies, where we compare full-waveform inversion results for both methods, for good and bad starting models, and for high frequencies where we compare reverse-time migration with linearized imaging based on wavefield-reconstruction inversion. The examples confirm the expected benefits of the proposed method.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Imaging, Optimization, penalty method},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20140704},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/peters2014EAGEweb/peters2014EAGEweb.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2014/peters2014EAGEweb/peters2014EAGEweb_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {herrmann2014SEGWS,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) {\textendash} a new take on wave-equation based inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Full Waveform Inversion - Elastic Approaches and Issues with Anisotropy, Nonshallow Inversion, Poor Starting Model; Denver},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Denver)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/herrmann2014SEGWSwri/herrmann2014SEGWSwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {kumar2013SEGAVA,
	title = {AVA analysis and geological dip estimation via two-way wave-equation based extended images},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {423-427},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present an efficient way to compute extended images for all subsurface offsets without explicitly calculating the source and receiver wavefields for all the sources. Because the extended images contain all possible subsurface offsets, we compute the angle-domain image gathers by selecting the subsurface offset that is aligned with the local dip. We also propose a method to compute the local dip information directly from common-image-point gathers. To assess the quality of the angle-domain common-image-points gathers we compute the angle-dependent reflectivity coefficients and compare them with theoretical reflectivity coefficients yielded by the (linearized) Zoeppritz equations for a few synthetic models.},
	keywords = {AVA, dip, extended images, SEG, wave-equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1348.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGAVA/kumar2013SEGAVA.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGAVA/kumar2013SEGAVA_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kumar2013SEGMVA,
	title = {Efficient WEMVA using extended images},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Advances in Model Building, Imaging, and FWI; Houston},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	abstract = {Image gathers as a function of subsurface offset are an important tool for velocity analysis in areas of complex geology. Here, we offer a new perspective on image gathers by organizing the extended image as a function of all subsurface offsets and all subsurface points in to a matrix whose (i,j)th entry captures the interaction between gridpoints i and j. For even small problems, it is infeasible to form and store this matrix. Instead, we propose an efficient algorithm to glean information from the image volume via efficient matrix-vector products. We illustrate how this can be used to construct objective functions for automated MVA.},
	keywords = {inversion, MVA, poster, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGMVA/kumar2013SEGMVA_poster.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {tu2013EAGElsm,
	title = {Fast least-squares migration with multiples and source estimation},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {The advent of modern computing has made it possible to do seismic imaging using least-squares reverse-time migration. We obtain superior images by solving an optimization problem that recovers the true-amplitude images. However, its success hinges on overcoming several issues, including overwhelming problem size, unknown source wavelet, and interfering coherent events like multiples. In this abstract, we reduce the problem size by using ideas from compressive sensing, and estimate source wavelet by generalized variable projection. We also demonstrate how to invert for subsurface information encoded in surface-related multiples by incorporating the free-surface operator as an areal source in reverse-time migration. Our synthetic examples show that multiples help to improve the resolution of the image, as well as remove the amplitude ambiguity in wavelet estimation.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Imaging, multiples, source estimation, sparse},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130727},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/tu2013EAGElsm/tu2013EAGElsm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/tu2013EAGElsm/tu2013EAGElsm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ning Tu and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI,
	title = {In which domain should we measure the misfit for robust full waveform inversion?},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on minimizing the difference between observed and modeled data, as measured by some penalty function. A popular choice, of course, is the least-squares penalty. However, when outliers are present in the data, the use of robust penalties such as the Huber or Student{\textquoteright}s t may significantly improve the results since they put relatively less weight on large residuals. In order for robust penalties to be effective, the outliers must be somehow localized and distinguishable from the good data. We propose to first transform the residual into a domain where the outliers are localized before measuring the misfit with a robust penalty. This is exactly how one would normally devise filters to remove the noise before applying conventional FWI. We propose to merge the two steps and let the inversion process implicitly filter out the noise. Results on a synthetic dataset show the effectiveness of the approach.},
	keywords = {EAGE, full waveform inversion},
	doi = {10.3997/2214-4609.20130839},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2013/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI/vanleeuwen2013EAGErobustFWI_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Henri Calandra and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {tu2013SEGldi,
	title = {Limitations of the deconvolutional imaging condition for two-way propagators},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {3916-3920},
	abstract = {The deconvolutional imaging condition has gained wide attention in recent years, as it is often used to image surface-related multiples. However, we noticed on close inspection that this condition was derived from one-way propagation principles. Now that two-way wave-equation based simulations have become more affordable, we revisit the deconvolutional imaging condition and reveal its limitations for two-way propagators. First, it can distort the image due to receiver-side propagation effects. Second, when used to image surface-related multiples, it is not capable of removing all interfering phantom reflectors.},
	keywords = {inversion, migration, multiples, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1440.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGldi/tu2013SEGldi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGldi/tu2013SEGldi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ning Tu and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe,
	title = {Optimization driven model-space versus data-space approaches to invert elastic data with the acoustic wave equation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {986-990},
	abstract = {Inverting data with elastic phases using an acoustic wave equation can lead to erroneous results, especially when the number of iterations is too high, which may lead to over fitting the data. Several approaches have been proposed to address this issue. Most commonly, people apply "data-independent" filtering operations that are aimed to deemphasize the elastic phases in the data in favor of the acoustic phases. Examples of this approach are nested loops over offset range and Laplace parameters. In this paper, we discuss two complementary optimization-driven methods where the minimization process decides adaptively which of the data or model components are consistent with the objective. Specifically, we compare the Student{\textquoteright}s t misfit function as the data-space alternative and curvelet-domain sparsity promotion as the model-space alternative. Application of these two methods to a realistic synthetic lead to comparable results that we believe can be improved by combining these two methods.},
	keywords = {elastic, Full-waveform inversion, least-squares, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1375.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Anais Tamalet and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2013SEGpmc,
	title = {A penalty method for PDE-constrained optimization with applications to wave-equation based seismic inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Computational Mathematics for Geophysics; Houston},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	keywords = {Optimization, penalty method, SEG, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/herrmann2013SEGpmc/herrmann2013SEGpmc_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {petrenko2013HPCSsaoc,
	title = {Software acceleration of CARP, an iterative linear solver and preconditioner},
	year = {2013},
	month = {06},
	publisher = {HPCS},
	organization = {HPCS},
	abstract = {We present the results of software optimization of a row-wise preconditioner (Component Averaged Row Projections) for the method of conjugate gradients, which is used to solve the diagonally banded Helmholtz system representing frequency domain, isotropic acoustic seismic wave simulation. We demonstrate that in our application, a preconditioner bound to one processor core and accessing memory contiguously reduces execution time by 7\% for matrices having on the order of 108 non-zeros. For reference we note that our C implementation is over 80 times faster than the corresponding code written for a high-level numerical analysis language.},
	keywords = {frequency-domain, Helmholtz equation, HPCS, Kaczmarz, software, wave propagation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/HPCS/2013/petrenko2013HPCSsaoc/petrenko2013HPCSsaoc.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/HPCS/2013/petrenko2013HPCSsaoc/petrenko2013HPCSsaoc_poster.pdf},
	author = {Art Petrenko and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2013ICASSPssi,
	title = {Sparse seismic imaging using variable projection},
	booktitle = {ICASSP},
	year = {2013},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {We consider an important class of signal processing problems where the signal of interest is known to be sparse, and can be recovered from data given auxiliary information about how this data was generated. For example, a sparse green{\textquoteright}s function may be recovered from seismic experimental data using sparsity optimization when the source signature is known. Unfortunately, in practice this information is often missing, and must be recovered from data along with the signal using deconvolution techniques. In this paper, we present a novel methodology to simulta- neously solve for the sparse signal and auxiliary parameters using a recently proposed variable projection technique. Our main contribution is to combine variable projection with spar- sity promoting optimization, obtaining an efficient algorithm for large-scale sparse deconvolution problems. We demon- strate the algorithm on a seismic imaging example.},
	keywords = {Imaging, Optimization, sparsity, variable projection},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICASSP/2013/aravkin2013ICASSPssi/aravkin2013ICASSPssi.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Ning Tu}
}
@conference {herrmann2012SEGfwi,
	title = {FWI from the West Coasts: lessons learned from "Gulf of Mexico Imaging Challenges: What Can Full Waveform Inversion Achieve?"},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on FWI; Las Vegas},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/herrmann2012SEGfwi/herrmann2012SEGfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li and Brendan R. Smithyman and Eric Takam Takougang and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanderneut2012SEGirs,
	title = {Interferometric redatuming with simultaneous and missing sources using sparsity promotion in the curvelet domain},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2012},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-7},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Interferometric redatuming is a velocity-independent method to turn downhole receivers into virtual sources. Accurate redatuming involves solving an inverse problem, which can be highly ill-posed, especially in the presence of noise, incomplete data and limited aperture. We address these issues by combining interferometric redatuming with transform-domain sparsity promotion, leading to a formulation that deals with data imperfections. We show that sparsity promotion improves the retrieval of virtual shot records under a salt flank. To reduce acquisition costs, it can be beneficial to reduce the number of sources or shoot them simultaneously. It is shown that sparse inversion can still provide a stable solution in such cases.},
	keywords = {Imaging, Interferometry, Optimization, Processing, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2012-0566.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/vanderneut2012SEGirs/vanderneut2012SEGirs.pdf},
	author = {Joost van der Neut and Felix J. Herrmann and Kees Wapenaar}
}
@conference {aravkin2012SEGST,
	title = {On non-uniqueness of the Student{\textquoteright}s t-formulation for linear inverse problems},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2012},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-5},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {We review the statistical interpretation of inverse problem formulations, and the motivations for selecting non-convex penalties for robust behaviour with respect to measurement outliers or artifacts in the data. An important downside of using non-convex formulations such as the Student{\textquoteright}s t is the potential for non-uniqueness, and we present a simple example where the Student{\textquoteright}s t penalty can be made to have many local minima by appropriately selecting the degrees of freedom parameter. On the other hand, the non-convexity of the Student{\textquoteright}s t is precisely what gives it the ability to ignore artifacts in the data. We explain this idea, and present a stylized imaging experiment, where the Student{\textquoteright}s t is able to recover a velocity perturbation from data contaminated by a very peculiar artifact {\textendash}- data from a different velocity perturbation. The performance of Student{\textquoteright}s t inversion is investigated empirically for different values of the degrees of freedom parameter, and different initial conditions.},
	keywords = {non-convex, robust, SEG, Student{\textquoteright}s t, uniqueness},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2012-1558.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/aravkin2012SEGST/aravkin2012SEGST.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Kenneth Bube and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2012EAGEcarpcg,
	title = {Preconditioning the Helmholtz equation via row-projections},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {3D frequency-domain full waveform inversion relies on being able to efficiently solve the 3D Helmholtz equation. Iterative methods require sophisticated preconditioners because the Helmholtz matrix is typically indefinite. We review a preconditioning technique that is based on row-projections. Notable advantages of this preconditioner over existing ones are that it has low algorithmic complexity, is easily parallelizable and extendable to time-harmonic vector equations.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Helmholtz equation, precondition},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/vanleeuwen2012EAGEcarpcg/vanleeuwen2012EAGEcarpcg.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/vanleeuwen2012EAGEcarpcg/vanleeuwen2012EAGEcarpcg_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=58891},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Dan Gordon and Rachel Gordon and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2012ICASSProbustb,
	title = {Robust inversion via semistochastic dimensionality reduction},
	booktitle = {ICASSP},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {5245-5248},
	publisher = {ICASSP},
	organization = {ICASSP},
	abstract = {We consider a class of inverse problems where it is possible to aggregate the results of multiple experiments. This class includes problems where the forward model is the solution operator to linear ODEs or PDEs. The tremendous size of such problems motivates the use dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques based on randomly mixing experiments. These techniques break down, however, when robust data-fitting formulations are used, which are essential in cases of missing data, unusually large errors, and systematic features in the data unexplained by the forward model. We survey robust methods within a statistical framework, and propose a sampling optimization approach that allows DR. The efficacy of the methods are demonstrated for a large-scale seismic inverse problem using the robust Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution, where a useful synthetic velocity model is recovered in the extreme scenario of 60\% corrupted data. The sampling approach achieves this recovery using 20\% of the effort required by a direct robust approach.},
	keywords = {ICASSP},
	doi = {10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6289103},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICASSP/2012/AravkinFriedlanderLeeuwen/AravkinFriedlanderLeeuwen.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Michael P. Friedlander and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {aravkin2012EAGErobust,
	title = {Source estimation for frequency-domain FWI with robust penalties},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Source estimation is an essential component of full waveform inversion. In the standard frequency domain formulation, there is closed form solution for the the optimal source weights, which can thus be cheaply estimated on the fly. A growing body of work underscores the importance of robust modeling for data with large outliers or artifacts that are not captured by the forward model. Effectively, the least-squares penalty on the residual is replaced by a robust penalty, such as Huber, Hybrid {\textquoteleft}1-{\textquoteleft}2 or Student{\textquoteright}s t. As we will demonstrate, it is essential to use the same robust penalty for source estimation. In this abstract, we present a general approach to robust waveform inversion with robust source estimation. In this general formulation, there is no closed form solution for the optimal source weights so we need to solve a scalar optimization problem to obtain these weights. We can efficiently solve this optimization problem with a Newton-like method in a few iterations. The computational cost involved is of the same order as the usual least-squares source estimation procedure. We show numerical examples illustrating robust source estimation and robust waveform inversion on synthetic data with outliers.},
	keywords = {EAGE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/aravkin2012EAGErobust/aravkin2012EAGErobust.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/aravkin2012EAGErobust/aravkin2012EAGErobust_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=59196},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Henri Calandra and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanderneut2012EAGEdecomp,
	title = {Up / down wavefield decomposition by sparse inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Expressions have been derived for the decomposition of multi-component seismic recordings into up- and down-going constituents. However, these expressions contain singularities at critical angles and can be sensitive for noise. By interpreting wavefield decomposition as an inverse problem and imposing constraints on the sparseness of the solution, we arrive at a robust formalism that can be applied to noisy data. The method is demonstrated on synthetic data with multi-component receivers in a horizontal borehole, but can also be applied for different configurations, including OBC and dual-sensor streamers.},
	keywords = {EAGE, sparse inversion, wavefield decomposition},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/vanderneut2012EAGEdecomp/vanderneut2012EAGEdecomp.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/vanderneut2012EAGEdecomp/vanderneut2012EAGEdecomp_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=58907},
	author = {Joost van der Neut and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2012EAGEext,
	title = {Wave-equation extended images: computation and velocity continuation},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {An extended image is a multi-dimensional correlation of source and receiver wavefields. For a kinematically correct velocity, most of the energy will be concentrated at zero offset. Because of the computational cost involved in correlating the wavefields for all offsets, such exteded images are computed for a subsurface offset that is aligned with the local dip. In this paper, we present an efficient way to compute extended images for all subsurface offsets without explicitly calculating the receiver wavefields, thus making it computationally feasible to compute such extended images. We show how more conventional image gathers, where the offset is aligned with the dip, can be extracted from this extended image. We also present a velocity continuation procedure that allows us to compute the extended image for a given velocity without recomputing all the source wavefields.},
	keywords = {EAGE, extended image, velocity continuation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/vanleeuwen2012EAGEext/vanleeuwen2012EAGEext.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2012/vanleeuwen2012EAGEext/vanleeuwen2012EAGEext_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=59616},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011ICIAMcbmcwe,
	title = {A correlation-based misfit criterion for wave-equation traveltime tomography},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Presented at ICIAM 2011, Vancouver BC},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {The inference of subsurface medium parameters from seismic data can be posed as a PDE-constrained data-fitting procedure. This approach is successful in reconstructing medium perturbations that are in the order of the wavelength. In practice, the data lack low frequency content and this means that one needs a good initial guess of the slowly varying component of the medium. For a wrong starting model an iterative reconstruction procedure is likely to end up in a local minimum. We propose to use a different measure of the misfit that makes the optimization problem well-posed in terms of the slowly varying velocity structures. This procedure can be seen as a generalization of ray-based traveltime tomography. We discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the method and give some numerical examples.},
	keywords = {ICIAM, Imaging, Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/vanleeuwen2011ICIAMcbmcwe/vanleeuwen2011ICIAMcbmcwe.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SEGffw,
	title = {Fast full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/HerrmannSEG2011fws/HerrmannSEG2011fws.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SLRAfwi,
	title = {Full waveform inversion with compressive updates},
	booktitle = {SLRA},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {Sparse and Low Rank Approximation 2011},
	organization = {Sparse and Low Rank Approximation 2011},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on large multi-experiment data volumes. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current push for higher quality models reveals fundamental shortcomings handling increasing problem sizes numerically. To address this fundamental issue, we propose a randomized dimensionality-reduction strategy motivated by recent developments in stochastic optimization and compressive sensing. In this formulation conventional Gauss-Newton iterations are replaced by dimensionality-reduced sparse recovery problems with source encodings.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SLRA/2011/herrmann2011SLRAfwi/herrmann2011SLRAfwi.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Xiang Li and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {aravkin2011SIAMfwi,
	title = {Full waveform inversion with compressive updates},
	booktitle = {SIAM},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SIAM CS\&E 2011},
	organization = {SIAM CS\&E 2011},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion relies on large multi-experiment data volumes. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current push for higher quality models reveals fundamental shortcomings handling increasing problem sizes numerically. To address this fundamental issue, we propose a randomized dimensionality-reduction strategy motivated by recent developments in stochastic optimization and compressive sensing. In this formulation conventional Gauss-Newton iterations are replaced by dimensionality-reduced sparse recovery problems with source encodings.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2011/aravkin2011SIAMfwi/aravkin2011SIAMfwi.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and James V. Burke and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {li2011EAGEfwirr,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion with randomized L1 recovery for the model updates},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a data fitting procedure that relies on the collection of seismic data volumes and sophisticated computing to create high-resolution results. With the advent of FWI, the improvements in acquisition and inversion have been substantial, but these improvements come at a high cost because FWI involves extremely large multi-experiment data volumes. The main obstacle is the "curse of dimensionality" exemplified by Nyquist{\~O}s sampling criterion, which puts a disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. In this paper, we address the "curse of dimensionality" by randomized dimensionality reduction of the FWI problem adapted from the field of CS. We invert for model updates by replacing the Gauss-Newton linearized subproblem for subsampled FWI with a sparsity promoting formulation, and solve this formulation using the SPGl1 algorithm. We speed up the algorithm and avoid overfitting the data by solving for the linearized updates only approximately. Our approach is successful because it reduces the size of seismic data volumes without loss of information. With this reduction, we can compute a Newton-like update with the reduced data volume at the cost of roughly one gradient update for the fully sampled wavefield.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/li11EAGEfwirr/li11EAGEfwirr.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/li11EAGEfwirr/li11EAGEfwirr_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=50345},
	author = {Xiang Li and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2011ICIAMconvexcompfwi,
	title = {FWI with sparse recovery: a convex-composite approach},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {Iterative inversion algorithms require repeated simulation of 3D time-dependent acoustic, elastic, or electromagnetic wave fields, extending hundreds of wavelengths and hundreds of periods. Also, seismic data is rich in information at every representable scale. Thus simulation-driven optimization approaches to inversion impose great demands on simulator efficiency and accuracy. While computer hardware advances have been of critical importance in bringing inversion closer to practical application, algorithmic advances in simulator methodology have been equally important. Speakers in this two-part session will address a variety of numerical issues arising in the wave simulation, and in its application to inversion.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, ICIAM, Optimization},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/herrmann2011ICIAMconvexcompfwi/herrmann2011ICIAMconvexcompfwi.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011AMPhsdmwi,
	title = {A hybrid stocahstic-deterministic method for waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {AMP},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Presented at AMP Medical and Seismic Imaging, 2011, Vancouver BC},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {WAVES 2011},
	organization = {WAVES 2011},
	abstract = {A lot of seismic and medical imaging problems can be written as a least-squares data- fitting problem. In particular, we consider the case of multi-experiment data, where the data consists of a large number of "independent" measurements. Solving the inverse problem then involves repeatedly forward modeling the data for each of these experiments. In case the number of experiments is large and the modeling kernel expensive to apply, such an approach may be prohibitively expensive. We review techniques from stochastic optimization which aim at dramatically reducing the number of experiments that need to be modeled at each iteration. This reduction is typically achieved by randomly subsampling the data. Special care needs to be taken in the optimization to deal with the stochasticity that is introduced in this way.},
	keywords = {Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/vanleeuwen2011AMPhsdmwi/vanleeuwen2011AMPhsdmwi.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Mark Schmidt and Michael P. Friedlander and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011EAGEhsdomwi,
	title = {A hybrid stochastic-deterministic optimization method for waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Present-day high quality 3D acquisition can give us lower frequencies and longer offsets with which to invert. However, the computational costs involved in handling this data explosion are tremendous. Therefore, recent developments in full-waveform inversion have been geared towards reducing the computational costs involved. A key aspect of several approaches that have been proposed is a dramatic reduction in the number of sources used in each iteration. A reduction in the number of sources directly translates to less PDE-solves and hence a lower computational cost. Recent attention has been drawn towards reducing the sources by randomly combining the sources in to a few supershots, but other strategies are also possible. In all cases, the full data misfit, which involves all the sequential sources, is replaced by a reduced misfit that is much cheaper to evaluate because it involves only a small number of sources (batchsize). The batchsize controls the accuracy with which the reduced misfit approximates the full misfit. The optimization of such an inaccurate, or noisy, misfit is the topic of stochastic optimization. In this paper, we propose an optimization strategy that borrows ideas from the field of stochastic optimization. The main idea is that in the early stage of the optimization, far from the true model, we do not need a very accurate misfit. The strategy consists of gradually increasing the batchsize as the iterations proceed. We test the proposed strategy on a synthetic dataset. We achieve a very reasonable inversion result at the cost of roughly 13 evaluations of the full misfit. We observe a speed-up of roughly a factor 20.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi/vanleeuwen11EAGEhsdomwi_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=50341},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann and Mark Schmidt and Michael P. Friedlander}
}
@conference {li2011SBGFmgnsu,
	title = {Modified Gauss-Newton with sparse updates},
	booktitle = {SBGF},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SBGF},
	organization = {SBGF},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a data fitting procedure that relies on the collection of seismic data volumes and sophisticated computing to create high-resolution models.With the advent of FWI, the improvements in acquisition and inversion have been substantial, but these improvements come at a high cost because FWI involves extremely large multi-experiment data volumes. The main obstacle is the {\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright} exemplified by Nyquist{\textquoteright}s sampling criterion, which puts a disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. In this paper, we address the {\textquoteleft}curse of dimensionality{\textquoteright} by using randomized dimensionality reduction of the FWI problem, coupled with a modified Gauss-Newton (GN) method designed to promote curvelet-domain sparsity of model updates. We solve for these updates using the spectral projected gradient method, implemented in the SPG1 software package. Our approach is successful because it reduces the size of seismic data volumes without loss of information. With this reduction, we can compute Gauss-Newton updates with the reduced data volume at the cost of roughly one gradient update for the fully sampled wavefield},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SBGF},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SBGF/2011/li11SBGFmgnsu/li11SBGFmgnsu.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SPIEmsp,
	title = {A modified, sparsity promoting, Gauss-Newton algorithm for seismic waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {Proc. SPIE},
	number = {81380V},
	year = {2011},
	month = {08},
	abstract = {Images obtained from seismic data are used by the oil and gas industry for geophysical exploration. Cutting-edge methods for transforming the data into interpretable images are moving away from linear approximations and high-frequency asymptotics towards Full Waveform Inversion (FWI), a nonlinear data-fitting procedure based on full data modeling using the wave-equation. The size of the problem, the nonlinearity of the forward model, and ill-posedness of the formulation all contribute to a pressing need for fast algorithms and novel regularization techniques to speed up and improve inversion results. In this paper, we design a modified Gauss-Newton algorithm to solve the PDE- constrained optimization problem using ideas from stochastic optimization and compressive sensing. More specifically, we replace the Gauss-Newton subproblems by randomly subsampled, -$\ell_1$ regularized subproblems. This allows us us significantly reduce the computational cost of calculating the updates and exploit the compressibility of wavefields in Curvelets. We explain the relationships and connections between the new method and stochastic optimization and compressive sensing (CS), and demonstrate the efficacy of the new method on a large-scale synthetic seismic example.},
	keywords = {Compressive Sensing, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, SLIM},
	issn = {1},
	doi = {10.1117/12.893861},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SPIE/2011/herrmann2011SPIEmsp/herrmann2011SPIEmsp.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Xiang Li and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011SIAMGEOmawt,
	title = {Multiscale aspects of waveform tomography},
	booktitle = {SIAMGEO},
	year = {2011},
	publisher = {SIAM GeoSciences 2011},
	organization = {SIAM GeoSciences 2011},
	abstract = {We consider the inference of medium velocity from transmitted acoustic waves. Typically, the measurements are done in a narrow frequency band. As a result the sensitivity of the data with respect to velocity perturbations varies dramatically with the scale of the perturbation. {\textquoteleft}Smooth{\textquoteright} perturbations will cause a phase shift, whereas perturbations that vary on the wavelength-scale cause amplitude variations. We investigate how to incorporate this scale dependent behavior in the formulation of the inverse problem.},
	keywords = {Presentation},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SIAM/2011/vanleeuwen2011SIAMGEOmawt/vanleeuwen2011SIAMGEOmawt.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Wim A. Mulder}
}
@conference {aravkin2011EAGEnspf,
	title = {A nonlinear sparsity promoting formulation and algorithm for full waveform inversion},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	month = {05},
	abstract = {Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. FWI is typically formulated as a nonlinear least squares optimization problem, and various regularization techniques are used to guide the optimization because the problem is illposed. In this paper, we propose a novel sparse regularization which exploits the ability of curvelets to efficiently represent geophysical images. We then formulate a corresponding sparsity promoting constrained optimization problem, which we call Nonlinear Basis Pursuit Denoise (NBPDN) and present an algorithm to solve this problem to recover medium parameters. The utility of the NBPDN formulation and efficacy of the algorithm are demonstrated on a stylized cross-well experiment, where a sparse velocity perturbation is recovered with higher quality than the standard FWI formulation (solved with LBFGS). The NBPDN formulation and algorithm can recover the sparse perturbation even when the data volume is compressed to 5 \% of the original size using random superposition.},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion, Optimization},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/aravkin11EAGEnspf/aravkin11EAGEnspf.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/aravkin11EAGEnspf/aravkin11EAGEnspf_pres.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=50199},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and James V. Burke and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011SEGext,
	title = {Probing the extended image volume},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4045-4050},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {The prestack image volume can be defined as a cross- correlation of the source and receivers wavefields for non-zero space and time lags. If the background velocity is kinemati- cally acceptable, this image volume will have its main contributions at zero lag, even for complex models. Thus, it is an ideal tool for wave-equation migration velocity analysis in the presence of strong lateral heterogeneity. In particular, it allows us to pose migration velocity analysis as a PDE-constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the energy in the image volume at non-zero lag subject to fitting the data approximately. However, it is computationally infeasi- ble to explicitly form the whole image volume. In this paper, we discuss several ways to reduce the computational costs involved in computing the image volume and evaluating the focusing criterion. We reduce the costs for calculating the data by randomized source synthesis. We also present an efficient way to subsample the image volume. Finally, we propose an alternative optimization criterion and suggest a multiscale inversion strategy for wave-equation MVA.},
	keywords = {Imaging, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3628051},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/vanleeuwen11SEGext/vanleeuwen11SEGext.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011WAVESpeiv,
	title = {Probing the extended image volume for seismic velocity inversion},
	booktitle = {WAVES},
	year = {2011},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {Waves 2011},
	organization = {Waves 2011},
	abstract = {In seismic velocity inversion one aims to reconstruct a kinematically correct subsurface velocity model that can be used as input for further processing and inversion of the data. An important tool in velocity inversion is the prestack image volume. This image volume can be defined as a cross-correlation of the source and receivers wavefields for non-zero space and time lags. If the background velocity is kinematically acceptable, this image volume will have its main contributions at zero lag, even for complex models. Thus, it is an ideal tool for wave-equation migration velocity analysis in the presence of strong lateral heterogeneity. In particular, it allows us to pose migration velocity analysis as a PDE-constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the energy in the image volume at non-zero lag subject to fitting the data approximately. However, it is computationally infeasible to explicitly form the whole image volume. In this paper, we discuss several ways to reduce the computational costs involved in computing the image volume and evaluating the focusing criterion. We reduce the costs for calculating the data by randomized source synthesis. We also present an efficient way to subsample the image volume. Finally, we propose an alternative optimization criterion and suggest a multiscale inversion strategy for wave-equation MVA.},
	keywords = {Presentation},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/vanleeuwen2011WAVESpeiv/vanleeuwen2011WAVESpeiv.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011SEGrobust,
	title = {Robust full-waveform inversion using the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {09},
	pages = {2669-2673},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. Robust methods for FWI are needed to overcome sensitivity to noise and in cases where modeling is particularly poor or far from the real data generating process. We survey previous robust methods from a statistical perspective, and use this perspective to derive a new robust method by assuming the random errors in our model arise from the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution. We show that in contrast to previous robust methods, the new method progres- sively down-weighs large outliers, effectively ignoring them once they are large enough. This suggests that the new method is more robust and suitable for situations with very poor data quality or modeling. Experiments show that the new method recovers as well or better than previous robust methods, and can recover models with quality comparable to standard methods on noise-free data when some of the data is completely corrupted, and even when a marine acquisition mask is entirely ignored in the modeling. The ability to ignore a marine acquisition mask via robust FWI methods offers an opportunity for stochastic optimization methods in marine acquisition.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3627747},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/aravkin11SEGrobust/aravkin11SEGrobust.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011ICIAMrfwiu,
	title = {Robust FWI using Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {Iterative inversion algorithms require repeated simulation of 3D time-dependent acoustic, elastic, or electromagnetic wave fields, extending hundreds of wavelengths and hundreds of periods. Also, seismic data is rich in information at every representable scale. Thus simulation-driven optimization approaches to inversion impose great demands on simulator efficiency and accuracy. While computer hardware advances have been of critical importance in bringing inversion closer to practical application, algorithmic advances in simulator methodology have been equally important. Speakers in this two-part session will address a variety of numerical issues arising in the wave simulation, and in its application to inversion.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, ICIAM, Optimization, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/aravkin2011ICIAMrfwiu/aravkin2011ICIAMrfwiu.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {Herrmann2011BG,
	title = {SINBAD{\textquoteright}s research program},
	year = {2011},
	month = {11},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/Misc/Herrmann2011BG.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {aravkin2011ICIAMspf,
	title = {Sparsity promoting formulations and algorithms for FWI},
	booktitle = {ICIAM},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Presented at AMP Medical and Seismic Imaging, 2011, Vancouver BC.},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {ICIAM 2011},
	organization = {ICIAM 2011},
	abstract = {Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. FWI is typically formulated as a nonlinear least squares optimization problem, and various regularization techniques are used to guide the optimization because the problem is ill-posed. We propose a novel sparse regularization which exploits the ability of curvelets to efficiently represent geophysical images. We then formulate a corresponding sparsity promoting constrained optimization problem, which we solve using an open source algorithm. The techniques are applicable to any inverse problem where sparsity modeling is appropriate. We demonstrate the efficacy of the formulation on a toy example (stylized cross-well experiment) and on a realistic Seismic example (partial Marmoussi model). We also discuss the tradeoff between model fit and sparsity promotion, with a view to extend existing techniques for linear inverse problems to the case where the forward model is nonlinear.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, Presentation, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/ICIAM/2011/aravkin2011ICIAMspf/aravkin2011ICIAMspf_pres.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and James V. Burke and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011EAGEspfwi,
	title = {Sparsity promoting formulations and algorithms for FWI},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {EAGE, Full-waveform inversion},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2011/Aravkin2011EAGEspfwi/Aravkin2011EAGEspfwi.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and James V. Burke and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {frijlink2010EAGEcos,
	title = {Comparison of standard adaptive subtraction and primary-multiple separation in the curvelet domain},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2010},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {In recent years, data-driven multiple prediction methods and wavefield extrapolation methods have proven to be powerful methods to attenuate multiples from data acquired in complex 3-D geologic environments. These methods make use of a two-stage approach, where first the multiples (surface-related and / or internal) multiples are predicted before they are subtracted from the original input data in an adaptively. The quality of these predicted multiples often raises high expectations for the adaptive subtraction techniques, but for various reasons these expectations are not always met in practice. Standard adaptive subtraction methods use the well-known minimum energy criterion, stating that the total energy after optimal multiple attenuation should be minimal. When primaries and multiples interfere, the minimum energy criterion is no longer appropriate. Also, when multiples of different orders interfere, adaptive energy minimization will lead to a compromise between different amplitudes corrections for the different orders of multiples. This paper investigates the performance of two multiple subtraction schemes for a real data set that exhibits both interference problems. Results from an adaptive subtraction in the real curvelet domain, separating primaries and multiples, are compared to those obtained using a more conventional adaptive subtraction method in the spatial domain.},
	keywords = {EAGE},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2010/frijlink10EAGEcos/frijlink10EAGEcos.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=39875},
	author = {M. O. Frijlink and Reza Shahidi and Felix J. Herrmann and R. G. van Borselen}
}
@conference {vandenberg2009SLIMocf,
	title = {Optimizing costly functions with simple constraints: a limited-memory projected Quasi-Newton algorithm},
	booktitle = {SLIM},
	series = {Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics},
	volume = {12},
	year = {2009},
	month = {04},
	abstract = {An optimization algorithm for minimizing a smooth function over a convex set is described. Each iteration of the method computes a descent direction by minimizing, over the original constraints, a diagonal-plus low-rank quadratic approximation to the function. The quadratic approximation is constructed using a limited-memory quasi-Newton update. The method is suitable for large-scale problems where evaluation of the function is substan- tially more expensive than projection onto the constraint set. Numerical experiments on one-norm regularized test problems indicate that the proposed method is competitve with state-of-the-art methods such as bound-constrained L-BFGS and orthant-wise descent. We further show that the method generalizes to a wide class of problems, and substantially improves on state-of-the-art methods for problems such as learning the structure of Gaussian graphi- cal models (involving positive-definite matrix constraints) and Markov random fields (involving second-order cone constraints).},
	keywords = {SLIM},
	url = {http://www.cs.ubc.ca/ mpf/papers/SchmidtBergFriedMurph09.pdf},
	author = {Ewout van den Berg and Mark Schmidt and Michael P. Friedlander and K. Murphy}
}
@conference {friedlander2009SCAIMspot,
	title = {Spot: A linear-operator toolbox for Matlab},
	booktitle = {SCAIM},
	year = {2009},
	publisher = {SCAIM Seminar},
	organization = {SCAIM Seminar},
	address = {University of British Columbia},
	keywords = {minimization, Presentation, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2009/VandenBerg-Mon-1130.pdf},
	author = {Ewout van den Berg and Michael P. Friedlander}
}
@conference {vandenberg2008IAMesr,
	title = {Exact sparse reconstruction and neighbourly polytopes},
	booktitle = {IAM},
	year = {2008},
	keywords = {IAM, Presentation, private, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Private/Conferences/IAM/2008/vandenberg2008IAMesr/vandenberg2008IAMesr.pdf},
	author = {Ewout van den Berg}
}
@conference {vandenberg2008SINBADsat,
	title = {Sparco: A testing framework for sparse reconstruction},
	booktitle = {SINBAD 2008},
	year = {2008},
	abstract = {Sparco is a framework for testing and benchmarking algorithms for sparse reconstruction. It includes a large collection of sparse reconstruction problems drawn from the imaging, compressed sensing, and geophysics literature. Sparco is also a framework for implementing new test problems and can be used as a tool for reproducible research. We describe the software environment, and demonstrate its usefulness for testing and comparing solvers for sparse reconstruction.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2008/vandenberg2008SINBADsat/vandenberg2008SINBADsat.pdf},
	author = {Ewout van den Berg}
}
@conference {vandenberg2007SINBADipo1,
	title = {In pursuit of a root},
	booktitle = {2007 Von Neumann Symposium},
	year = {2007},
	keywords = {minimization, Presentation, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2007/vandenberg2007SINBADipo1/vandenberg2007SINBADipo1.pdf},
	author = {Ewout van den Berg and Michael P. Friedlander}
}
@conference {vandenberg07VONipo,
	title = {In pursuit of a root},
	year = {2007},
	month = {07},
	publisher = {Von Neumann Symposium},
	organization = {Von Neumann Symposium},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/vonNeuman/2007/vandenberg07VONipo/vandenberg07VONipo.pdf},
	author = {Ewout van den Berg and Michael P. Friedlander}
}
@conference {verschuur2007SEGmmp,
	title = {Multiterm multiple prediction using separated reflections and diffractions combined with curvelet-based subtraction},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {2535-2539},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {The surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) method has proven to be successful on a large number of data cases. Most of the applications are still 2D, as the full 3D implementation is still expensive and under development. However, the earth is a 3D medium, such that 3D effects are difficult to avoid. Most of the 3D effects come from diffractive structures, whereas the specular reflections normally have less of a 3D behavior. By separating the seismic data in a specular reflecting and a diffractive part, multiple prediction can be carried out with these different subsets of the input data, resulting in several categories of predicted multiples. Because each category of predicted multiples can be subtracted from the input data with different adaptation filters, a more flexible SRME procedure is obtained. Based on some initial results from a Gulf of Mexico dataset, the potential of this approach is investigated. \copyright2007 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2792993},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/verschuur07SEGmmp/verschuur07SEGmmp.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/verschuur07SEGmmp/verschuur07SEGmmp_pres.pdf},
	author = {D. J. Verschuur and Deli Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2006SINBADpms,
	title = {Primary-multiple separation by curvelet frames},
	booktitle = {SINBAD 2006},
	volume = {170},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {781-799},
	publisher = {Geophysical Journal International},
	organization = {Geophysical Journal International},
	abstract = {Predictive multiple suppression methods consist of two main steps: a prediction step, during which multiples are predicted from seismic data, and a primary-multiple separation step, during which the predicted multiples are {\textquoteright}matched{\textquoteright} with the true multiples in the data and subsequently removed. The last step is crucial in practice: an incorrect separation will cause residual multiple energy in the result or may lead to a distortion of the primaries, or both. To reduce these adverse effects, a new transformed-domain method is proposed where primaries and multiples are separated rather than matched. This separation is carried out on the basis of differences in the multiscale and multidirectional characteristics of these two signal components. Our method uses the curvelet transform, which maps multidimensional data volumes into almost orthogonal localized multidimensional prototype waveforms that vary in directional and spatio-temporal content. Primaries-only and multiples-only signal components are recovered from the total data volume by a nonlinear optimization scheme that is stable under noisy input data. During the optimization, the two signal components are separated by enhancing sparseness (through weighted l1-norms) in the transformed domain subject to fitting the observed data as the sum of the separated components to within a user-defined tolerance level. Whenever the prediction for the two signal components in the transformed domain correlate, the recovery is suppressed while for regions where the correlation is small the method seeks the sparsest set of coefficients that represent each signal component. Our algorithm does not seek a matched filter and as such it differs fundamentally from traditional adaptive subtraction methods. The method derives its stability from the sparseness obtained by a non-parametric multiscale and multidirectional overcomplete signal representation. This sparsity serves as prior information and allows for a Bayesian interpretation of our method during which the log-likelihood function is minimized while the two signal components are assumed to be given by a superposition of prototype waveforms, drawn independently from a probability function that is weighted by the predicted primaries and multiples. In this paper, the predictions are based on the data-driven surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) method. Synthetic and field data examples show a clean separation leading to a considerable improvement in multiple suppression compared to the conventional method of adaptive matched filtering. This improved separation translates into an improved stack.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03360.x},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2006/herrmann2006SINBADpms/herrmann2006SINBADpms.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Urs Boeniger and D. J. Verschuur}
}
@conference {herrmann2005EAGErcd1,
	title = {Robust curvelet-domain primary-multiple separation with sparseness constraints},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2005},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {A non-linear primary-multiple separation method using curvelets frames is presented. The advantage of this method is that curvelets arguably provide an optimal sparse representation for both primaries and multiples. As such curvelets frames are ideal candidates to separate primaries from multiples given inaccurate predictions for these two data components. The method derives its robustness regarding the presence of noise; errors in the prediction and missing data from the curvelet frame{\textquoteright}s ability (i) to represent both signal components with a limited number of multi-scale and directional basis functions; (ii) to separate the components on the basis of differences in location, orientation and scales and (iii) to minimize correlations between the coefficients of the two components. A brief sketch of the theory is provided as well as a number of examples on synthetic and real data.},
	keywords = {EAGE, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2005/Herrmann05EAGErcd1/Herrmann05EAGErcd1.pdf},
	url2 = {http://earthdoc.eage.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=1384},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and D. J. Verschuur}
}
@conference {herrmann2004CSEGcia1,
	title = {Curvelet imaging and processing: adaptive multiple elimination},
	booktitle = {CSEG Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2004},
	month = {05},
	publisher = {CSEG},
	organization = {CSEG},
	abstract = {Predictive multiple suppression methods consist of two main steps: a prediction step, in which multiples are predicted from the seismic data, and a subtraction step, in which the predicted multiples are matched with the true multiples in the data. The last step appears crucial in practice: an incorrect adaptive subtraction method will cause multiples to be sub-optimally subtracted or primaries being distorted, or both. Therefore, we propose a new domain for separation of primaries and multiples via the Curvelet transform. This transform maps the data into almost orthogonal localized events with a directional and spatial-temporal component. The multiples are suppressed by thresholding the input data at those Curvelet components where the predicted multiples have large amplitudes. In this way the more traditional filtering of predicted multiples to fit the input data is avoided. An initial field data example shows a considerable improvement in multiple suppression.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2004/Herrmann04CSEGcia1/Herrmann04CSEGcia1_paper.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/CSEG/2004/Herrmann04CSEGcia1/Herrmann04CSEGcia1.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and D. J. Verschuur}
}
@conference {herrmann2004SEGcdm,
	title = {Curvelet-domain multiple elimination with sparseness constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {23},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {1333-1336},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Predictive multiple suppression methods consist of two main steps: a prediction step, in which multiples are predicted from the seismic data, and a subtraction step, in which the predicted multiples are matched with the true multiples in the data. The last step appears crucial in practice: an incorrect adaptive subtraction method will cause multiples to be sub-optimally subtracted or primaries being distorted, or both. Therefore, we propose a new domain for separation of primaries and multiples via the Curvelet transform. This transform maps the data into almost orthogonal localized events with a directional and spatial-temporal component. The multiples are suppressed by thresholding the input data at those Curvelet components where the predicted multiples have large amplitudes. In this way the more traditional filtering of predicted multiples to fit the input data is avoided. An initial field data example shows a considerable improvement in multiple suppression. \copyright2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.1851110},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcdm/Herrmann04SEGcdm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcdm/Herrmann04SEGcdm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and D. J. Verschuur}
}
@conference {herrmann2004EAGEsop,
	title = {Separation of primaries and multiples by non-linear estimation in the curvelet domain},
	booktitle = {EAGE Annual Conference Proceedings},
	year = {2004},
	month = {06},
	abstract = {Predictive multiple suppression methods consist of two main steps: a prediction step, in which multiples are predicted from the seismic data, and a subtraction step, in which the predicted multiples are matched with the true multiples in the data. The last step appears crucial in practice: an incorrect adaptive subtraction method will cause multiples to be sub-optimally subtracted or primaries being distorted, or both. Therefore, we propose a new domain for separation of primaries and multiples via the Curvelet transform. This transform maps the data into almost orthogonal localized events with a directional and spatial-temporal component. The multiples are suppressed by thresholding the input data at those Curvelet components where the predicted multiples have large amplitudes. In this way the more traditional filtering of predicted multiples to fit the input data is avoided. An initial field data example shows a considerable improvement in multiple suppression.},
	keywords = {SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/EAGE/2004/herrmann2004EAGEsop/herrmann2004EAGEsop.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and D. J. Verschuur}
}
