@conference {siahkoohi2019SEGsrm,
	title = {Surface-related multiple elimination with deep learning},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2019},
	note = {(SEG, San Antonio)},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4629-4634},
	abstract = {We explore the potential of neural networks in approximating the action of the computationally expensive Estimation of Primaries by Sparse Inversion (EPSI) algorithm, applied to real data, via a supervised learning algorithm. We show that given suitable training data, consisting of a relatively cheap prediction of multiples and pairs of shot records with and without surface-related multiples, obtained via EPSI, a well-trained neural network is capable of providing an approximation to the action of the EPSI algorithm. We perform our numerical experiment on the field Nelson data set. Our results demonstrate that the quality of the multiple elimination via our neural network improves compared to the case where we only feed the network with shot records with surface-related multiples. We take these benefits by supplying the neural network with a relatively poor prediction of the multiples, e.g. obtained by a relatively cheap single step of Surface-Related Multiple Elimination.},
	keywords = {EPSI, machine learning, SEG, SRME},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2019-3216723.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2019/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm/siahkoohi2019SEGsrm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ali Siahkoohi and Dirk J. Verschuur and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kadu2018SEGMSFWI,
	title = {Full-waveform inversion with Mumford-Shah regularization},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1258-1262},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a non-linear procedure to es- timate subsurface rock parameters from surface measurements of induced seismic waves. This procedure is ill-posed in nature and hence, requires regularization to enhance some structure depending on the prior information. Recently, Total-variation (TV) regularization has gained popularity due to its ability to produce blocky structures. Contrary to this, the earth behave more like a piecewise smooth function. TV regularization fails to enforce this prior information into FWI. We propose a Mumford-Shah functional to incorporate the piecewise smooth spatial structure in the FWI procedure. The resulting opti- mization problem is solved by a splitting method. We show the improvement in results against TV regularization on two synthetic camembert examples.},
	keywords = {FWI, Mumford-Shah, regularization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2997224.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/kadu2018SEGMSFWI/kadu2018SEGMSFWI.pdf},
	author = {Ajinkya Kadu and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen}
}
@conference {kumar2018SEGlreiv,
	title = {Low-rank representation of extended image volumes{\textendash}{\textendash}applications to imaging and velocity continuation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2018},
	note = {(SEG, Anaheim)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {4418-4422},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present a cost-effective low-rank factorized form of computing the full subsurface extended image volumes without explicitly calculating the receiver wavefields. The propose approach is computationally feasible, which exploits the low-rank structure of full subsurface extended image volumes organized as a matrix, thus avoiding the customary loop over sources. Using carefully selected stylized examples, we show how conventional migration images can be extracted from the low-rank factorized form. We also present a velocity continuation procedure that uses the same low-rank form and allows us to map the extended image for one velocity model to another velocity model without recomputing all the source wavefields.},
	keywords = {image volume, low-rank, SEG, velocity continuation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2018-2998404.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2018/kumar2018SEGlreiv/kumar2018SEGlreiv.html},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Marie Graff-Kray and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {peters2016SEGprs,
	title = {Parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1411-1415},
	abstract = {This abstract is about reducing the total computation time to solve full-waveform inversion problems. A common problem formulation is a nonlinear least-squares problem where the gradient is computed using the adjoint-state algorithm. This formulation offers parallelism for the computation of gradients for different sources and frequencies. The adjoint-state algorithm itself is sequential however and this is a limiting factor when a lot of compute nodes are available and only a few wavefields need to be computed. This situation occurs when stochastic optimization strategies are used to minimize the objective function. We present a parallel reformulation of the sequential adjoint-state algorithm, which allows the forward- and adjoint wavefields to be computed in parallel. Both algorithms are mathematically equivalent but the parallel version is twice as fast in run time. An important characteristic of the proposed algorithm is that one wavefield needs to be computed per source and one per receiver. These fields can be used to apply the (inverse) Gauss-Newton Hessian to a vector without recomputing wavefields. A 2D example shows that good full-waveform inversion results are obtained, even when a small number of sources and receivers is used.},
	keywords = {FWI, numerical linear algebra, parallel computing, PDE-constrained optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13966771.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/peters2016SEGprs/peters2016SEGprs_pres.pdf},
	author = {Bas Peters and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {sharan2016SEGspj,
	title = {Sparsity-promoting joint microseismic source collocation and source-time function estimation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {2574-2579},
	abstract = {In this work, we propose a new method to simultaneously locate microseismic events (e.g., induced by hydraulic fracturing) and estimate the source signature of these events. We use the method of linearized Bregman. This algorithm focuses unknown sources at their true locations by promoting sparsity along space and at the same time keeping the energy along time in check. We are particularly interested in situations where the microseismic data is noisy, sources have different signatures and we only have access to the smooth background-velocity model. We perform numerical experiments to demonstrate the usability of the proposed method. We also compare our results with full-waveform inversion based microseismic event collocation methods. Our method gives flexibility to simultaneously get a more accurate source image along with an estimate of the source-time function, which carries important information on the rupturing process and source mechanism.},
	keywords = {microseismic, noise, SEG, sources, sparse, wave equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13871022.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/sharan2016SEGspj/sharan2016SEGspj.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/sharan2016SEGspj/sharan2016SEGspj_pres.pdf},
	author = {Shashin Sharan and Rongrong Wang and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {fang2016SEGuqw,
	title = {Uncertainty quantification for Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion using a PDE free semidefinite Hessian and randomize-then-optimize method},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2016},
	note = {(SEG, Dallas)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1390-1394},
	abstract = {The data of full-waveform inversion often contains noise, which induces uncertainties in the inversion results. Ideally, one would like to run a number of independent inversions with different realizations of the noise and assess model-side uncertainties from the resulting models, however this is not feasible because we collect the data only once. To circumvent this restriction, various sampling schemes have been devised to generate an ensemble of models that fit the data to within the noise level. Such sampling schemes typically involve running multiple inversions or evaluating the Hessian of the cost function, both of which are computationally expensive. In this work, we propose a new method to quantify uncertainties based on a novel formulation of the full-waveform inversion problem {\textendash} wavefield reconstruction inversion. Based on this formulation, we formulate a semidefinite approximation of the corresponding Hessian matrix. By precomputing certain quantities, we are able to apply this Hessian to given input vectors without additional solutions of the underlying partial differential equations. To generate a sample, we solve an auxiliary stochastic optimization problem involving this Hessian. The result is a computationally feasible method that, with little overhead, can generate as many samples as required at small additional cost. We test our method on the synthetic BG Compass model and compare the results to a direct-sampling approach. The results show the feasibility of applying our method to computing statistical quantities such as the mean and standard deviation in the context of wavefield reconstruction inversion.},
	keywords = {SEG, Uncertainty quantification, WRI},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2016-13879108.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/fang2016SEGuqw/fang2016SEGuqw.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2016/fang2016SEGuqw/fang2016SEGuqw_pres.pdf},
	author = {Zhilong Fang and Chia Ying Lee and Curt Da Silva and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {esser2015SEGasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textendash}- Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2015},
	note = {(SEG, New Orleans)},
	month = {10},
	pages = {1337-1343},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {convex constraints, Full-waveform inversion, salt, SEG, total-variation norm},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2015-5877995.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd.html},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2015/esser2015SEGasd/esser2015SEGasd_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2014SEGWS,
	title = {Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI) {\textendash} a new take on wave-equation based inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Full Waveform Inversion - Elastic Approaches and Issues with Anisotropy, Nonshallow Inversion, Poor Starting Model; Denver},
	year = {2014},
	note = {(SEG Workshop, Denver)},
	month = {10},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop, WRI},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2014/herrmann2014SEGWSwri/herrmann2014SEGWSwri_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Bas Peters}
}
@conference {kumar2013SEGAVA,
	title = {AVA analysis and geological dip estimation via two-way wave-equation based extended images},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {423-427},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present an efficient way to compute extended images for all subsurface offsets without explicitly calculating the source and receiver wavefields for all the sources. Because the extended images contain all possible subsurface offsets, we compute the angle-domain image gathers by selecting the subsurface offset that is aligned with the local dip. We also propose a method to compute the local dip information directly from common-image-point gathers. To assess the quality of the angle-domain common-image-points gathers we compute the angle-dependent reflectivity coefficients and compare them with theoretical reflectivity coefficients yielded by the (linearized) Zoeppritz equations for a few synthetic models.},
	keywords = {AVA, dip, extended images, SEG, wave-equation},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1348.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGAVA/kumar2013SEGAVA.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGAVA/kumar2013SEGAVA_pres.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {kumar2013SEGMVA,
	title = {Efficient WEMVA using extended images},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Advances in Model Building, Imaging, and FWI; Houston},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	abstract = {Image gathers as a function of subsurface offset are an important tool for velocity analysis in areas of complex geology. Here, we offer a new perspective on image gathers by organizing the extended image as a function of all subsurface offsets and all subsurface points in to a matrix whose (i,j)th entry captures the interaction between gridpoints i and j. For even small problems, it is infeasible to form and store this matrix. Instead, we propose an efficient algorithm to glean information from the image volume via efficient matrix-vector products. We illustrate how this can be used to construct objective functions for automated MVA.},
	keywords = {inversion, MVA, poster, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/kumar2013SEGMVA/kumar2013SEGMVA_poster.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {tu2013SEGldi,
	title = {Limitations of the deconvolutional imaging condition for two-way propagators},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {3916-3920},
	abstract = {The deconvolutional imaging condition has gained wide attention in recent years, as it is often used to image surface-related multiples. However, we noticed on close inspection that this condition was derived from one-way propagation principles. Now that two-way wave-equation based simulations have become more affordable, we revisit the deconvolutional imaging condition and reveal its limitations for two-way propagators. First, it can distort the image due to receiver-side propagation effects. Second, when used to image surface-related multiples, it is not capable of removing all interfering phantom reflectors.},
	keywords = {inversion, migration, multiples, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1440.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGldi/tu2013SEGldi.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/tu2013SEGldi/tu2013SEGldi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Ning Tu and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe,
	title = {Optimization driven model-space versus data-space approaches to invert elastic data with the acoustic wave equation},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {32},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	pages = {986-990},
	abstract = {Inverting data with elastic phases using an acoustic wave equation can lead to erroneous results, especially when the number of iterations is too high, which may lead to over fitting the data. Several approaches have been proposed to address this issue. Most commonly, people apply "data-independent" filtering operations that are aimed to deemphasize the elastic phases in the data in favor of the acoustic phases. Examples of this approach are nested loops over offset range and Laplace parameters. In this paper, we discuss two complementary optimization-driven methods where the minimization process decides adaptively which of the data or model components are consistent with the objective. Specifically, we compare the Student{\textquoteright}s t misfit function as the data-space alternative and curvelet-domain sparsity promotion as the model-space alternative. Application of these two methods to a realistic synthetic lead to comparable results that we believe can be improved by combining these two methods.},
	keywords = {elastic, Full-waveform inversion, least-squares, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2013-1375.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe/li2013SEGodmvdaiedwawe_pres.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Anais Tamalet and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2013SEGpmc,
	title = {A penalty method for PDE-constrained optimization with applications to wave-equation based seismic inversion},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on Computational Mathematics for Geophysics; Houston},
	year = {2013},
	month = {09},
	keywords = {Optimization, penalty method, SEG, workshop},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2013/herrmann2013SEGpmc/herrmann2013SEGpmc_pres.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2012SEGfwi,
	title = {FWI from the West Coasts: lessons learned from "Gulf of Mexico Imaging Challenges: What Can Full Waveform Inversion Achieve?"},
	booktitle = {SEG Workshop on FWI; Las Vegas},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	keywords = {FWI, SEG, workshop},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/herrmann2012SEGfwi/herrmann2012SEGfwi_pres.pdf},
	author = {Andrew J. Calvert and Ian Hanlon and Mostafa Javanmehri and Rajiv Kumar and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li and Brendan R. Smithyman and Eric Takam Takougang and Haneet Wason and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {vanderneut2012SEGirs,
	title = {Interferometric redatuming with simultaneous and missing sources using sparsity promotion in the curvelet domain},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2012},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-7},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Interferometric redatuming is a velocity-independent method to turn downhole receivers into virtual sources. Accurate redatuming involves solving an inverse problem, which can be highly ill-posed, especially in the presence of noise, incomplete data and limited aperture. We address these issues by combining interferometric redatuming with transform-domain sparsity promotion, leading to a formulation that deals with data imperfections. We show that sparsity promotion improves the retrieval of virtual shot records under a salt flank. To reduce acquisition costs, it can be beneficial to reduce the number of sources or shoot them simultaneously. It is shown that sparse inversion can still provide a stable solution in such cases.},
	keywords = {Imaging, Interferometry, Optimization, Processing, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2012-0566.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/vanderneut2012SEGirs/vanderneut2012SEGirs.pdf},
	author = {Joost van der Neut and Felix J. Herrmann and Kees Wapenaar}
}
@conference {aravkin2012SEGST,
	title = {On non-uniqueness of the Student{\textquoteright}s t-formulation for linear inverse problems},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {31},
	year = {2012},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-5},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {We review the statistical interpretation of inverse problem formulations, and the motivations for selecting non-convex penalties for robust behaviour with respect to measurement outliers or artifacts in the data. An important downside of using non-convex formulations such as the Student{\textquoteright}s t is the potential for non-uniqueness, and we present a simple example where the Student{\textquoteright}s t penalty can be made to have many local minima by appropriately selecting the degrees of freedom parameter. On the other hand, the non-convexity of the Student{\textquoteright}s t is precisely what gives it the ability to ignore artifacts in the data. We explain this idea, and present a stylized imaging experiment, where the Student{\textquoteright}s t is able to recover a velocity perturbation from data contaminated by a very peculiar artifact {\textendash}- data from a different velocity perturbation. The performance of Student{\textquoteright}s t inversion is investigated empirically for different values of the degrees of freedom parameter, and different initial conditions.},
	keywords = {non-convex, robust, SEG, Student{\textquoteright}s t, uniqueness},
	doi = {10.1190/segam2012-1558.1},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2012/aravkin2012SEGST/aravkin2012SEGST.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Kenneth Bube and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@techreport {vanleeuwen2012SEGparallel,
	title = {A parallel, object-oriented framework for frequency-domain wavefield imaging and inversion.},
	number = {TR-EOAS-2012-2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {04},
	institution = {Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences},
	address = {University of British Columbia, Vancouver},
	abstract = {We present a parallel object-oriented matrix-free framework for frequency-domain seismic modeling, imaging and inversion. The key aspects of the framework are its modularity and level of abstraction, which allows us to write code that reflects the underlying mathematical structure and develop unit-tests that guarantee the fidelity of the code. By overloading standard linear-algebra operations, such as matrix-vector multiplications, we can use standard optimization packages to work with our code without any modification. This leads to a scalable testbed on which new methods can be rapidly prototyped and tested on medium-sized 2D problems. Although our current implementation uses (parallel) Matlab, all of these design principles can also be met by using lower-level languages which is important when we want to scale to realistic 3D problems. We present some numerical examples on synthetic data.},
	keywords = {Imaging, inversion, Modeling, SEG},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/TechReport/2012/vanleeuwen2012SEGparallel/vanleeuwen2012SEGparallel.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2011SEGffw,
	title = {Fast full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, SEG, SLIM},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/HerrmannSEG2011fws/HerrmannSEG2011fws.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann and Tristan van Leeuwen and Xiang Li}
}
@conference {vanleeuwen2011SEGext,
	title = {Probing the extended image volume},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {09},
	pages = {4045-4050},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {The prestack image volume can be defined as a cross- correlation of the source and receivers wavefields for non-zero space and time lags. If the background velocity is kinemati- cally acceptable, this image volume will have its main contributions at zero lag, even for complex models. Thus, it is an ideal tool for wave-equation migration velocity analysis in the presence of strong lateral heterogeneity. In particular, it allows us to pose migration velocity analysis as a PDE-constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the energy in the image volume at non-zero lag subject to fitting the data approximately. However, it is computationally infeasi- ble to explicitly form the whole image volume. In this paper, we discuss several ways to reduce the computational costs involved in computing the image volume and evaluating the focusing criterion. We reduce the costs for calculating the data by randomized source synthesis. We also present an efficient way to subsample the image volume. Finally, we propose an alternative optimization criterion and suggest a multiscale inversion strategy for wave-equation MVA.},
	keywords = {Imaging, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3628051},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/vanleeuwen11SEGext/vanleeuwen11SEGext.pdf},
	author = {Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {aravkin2011SEGrobust,
	title = {Robust full-waveform inversion using the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {30},
	year = {2011},
	month = {09},
	pages = {2669-2673},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a computational procedure to extract medium parameters from seismic data. Robust methods for FWI are needed to overcome sensitivity to noise and in cases where modeling is particularly poor or far from the real data generating process. We survey previous robust methods from a statistical perspective, and use this perspective to derive a new robust method by assuming the random errors in our model arise from the Student{\textquoteright}s t-distribution. We show that in contrast to previous robust methods, the new method progres- sively down-weighs large outliers, effectively ignoring them once they are large enough. This suggests that the new method is more robust and suitable for situations with very poor data quality or modeling. Experiments show that the new method recovers as well or better than previous robust methods, and can recover models with quality comparable to standard methods on noise-free data when some of the data is completely corrupted, and even when a marine acquisition mask is entirely ignored in the modeling. The ability to ignore a marine acquisition mask via robust FWI methods offers an opportunity for stochastic optimization methods in marine acquisition.},
	keywords = {Full-waveform inversion, Optimization, SEG},
	doi = {10.1190/1.3627747},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2011/aravkin11SEGrobust/aravkin11SEGrobust.pdf},
	author = {Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Tristan van Leeuwen and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {verschuur2007SEGmmp,
	title = {Multiterm multiple prediction using separated reflections and diffractions combined with curvelet-based subtraction},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {2535-2539},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {The surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) method has proven to be successful on a large number of data cases. Most of the applications are still 2D, as the full 3D implementation is still expensive and under development. However, the earth is a 3D medium, such that 3D effects are difficult to avoid. Most of the 3D effects come from diffractive structures, whereas the specular reflections normally have less of a 3D behavior. By separating the seismic data in a specular reflecting and a diffractive part, multiple prediction can be carried out with these different subsets of the input data, resulting in several categories of predicted multiples. Because each category of predicted multiples can be subtracted from the input data with different adaptation filters, a more flexible SRME procedure is obtained. Based on some initial results from a Gulf of Mexico dataset, the potential of this approach is investigated. \copyright2007 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.2792993},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/verschuur07SEGmmp/verschuur07SEGmmp.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2007/verschuur07SEGmmp/verschuur07SEGmmp_pres.pdf},
	author = {D. J. Verschuur and Deli Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2004SEGcdm,
	title = {Curvelet-domain multiple elimination with sparseness constraints},
	booktitle = {SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts},
	volume = {23},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {1333-1336},
	publisher = {SEG},
	organization = {SEG},
	abstract = {Predictive multiple suppression methods consist of two main steps: a prediction step, in which multiples are predicted from the seismic data, and a subtraction step, in which the predicted multiples are matched with the true multiples in the data. The last step appears crucial in practice: an incorrect adaptive subtraction method will cause multiples to be sub-optimally subtracted or primaries being distorted, or both. Therefore, we propose a new domain for separation of primaries and multiples via the Curvelet transform. This transform maps the data into almost orthogonal localized events with a directional and spatial-temporal component. The multiples are suppressed by thresholding the input data at those Curvelet components where the predicted multiples have large amplitudes. In this way the more traditional filtering of predicted multiples to fit the input data is avoided. An initial field data example shows a considerable improvement in multiple suppression. \copyright2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists},
	keywords = {Presentation, SEG, SLIM},
	doi = {10.1190/1.1851110},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcdm/Herrmann04SEGcdm.pdf},
	presentation = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SEG/2004/Herrmann04SEGcdm/Herrmann04SEGcdm_pres.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and D. J. Verschuur}
}
