@presentation {esser2015SINBADasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textemdash} Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	year = {2015},
	note = {posthumously presented by Felix J. Herrmann},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/esser2015SINBADasd/esser2015SINBADasd.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2015SINBADFasd,
	title = {Automatic salt delineation {\textemdash} Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion with convex constraints},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We extend full-waveform inversion by Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion by including convex constraints on the model. Contrary to the conventional adjoint-state formulations, Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion has the advantage that the Gauss-Newton Hessian is well approximated by a diagonal scaling, which allows us to add convex constraints, such as the box- and the edge-preserving total-variation constraint, on the square slowness without incurring significant increases in computational costs. As the examples demonstrate, including these constraints yields far superior results in complex geological areas that contain high-velocity high-contrast bodies (e.g. salt or basalt). Without these convex constraints, adjoint-state and Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion get trapped in local minima for poor starting models.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/esser2015SINBADFasd/esser2015SINBADFasd.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/esser2015SINBADFasd/esser2015SINBADFasd.mov},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2015SINBADrdc,
	title = {Recent developments in compressive sensing for time-lapse studies},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We present an overview of the advances we have made with respect to extending compressive sensing ideas to time-lapse studies. We show applications in compressive time-lapse seismic data acquisition, imaging and full-waveform inversion.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Spring/oghenekohwo2015SINBADrdc/oghenekohwo2015SINBADrdc.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Ning Tu and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2015SINBADFrsa,
	title = {Resolving scaling ambiguities with the L1/L2 norm in a blind deconvolution problem with feedback},
	year = {2015},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Compared to more mundane blind deconvolution problems, blind deconvolution in seismic applications involves a feedback mechanism related to the free surface. The presence of this feedback mechanism gives us an unique opportunity to remove ambiguities that have plagued blind deconvolution for a long time. While beneficial, this feedback by itself is insufficient to remove the ambiguities even with L1 constraints. However, when paired with an L1/L2 constraint the feedback allows us to resolve the scaling ambiguity under relatively mild assumptions. Inspired by lifting approaches, we propose to split the sparse signal into positive and negative components and apply an \ell_1/\ell_2 constraint to the difference, thereby obtaining a constraint that is easy to implement. Numerical experiments demonstrate robustness to the initialization as well as to noise in the data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2015, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/esser2015SINBADFrsa/esser2015SINBADFrsa.pdf},
	url2 = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2015/Fall/esser2015SINBADFrsa/esser2015SINBADFrsa.mov},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Rongrong Wang and Tim T.Y. Lin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2014SINBADlcs,
	title = {A lifted $\ell_1$/$\ell_2$ constraint for sparse blind deconvolution},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We propose a modification to a sparsity constraint based on the ratio of l1 and l2 norms for solving blind seismic deconvolution problems in which the data consist of linear convolutions of different sparse reflectivities with the same source wavelet. No assumptions are made about the location of the support of either the wavelet or the sparse signals. Minimizing the ratio of l1 and l2 norms has been previously shown to promote sparsity in a variety of applications including blind deconvolution. Most existing implementations are heuristic or require smoothing the l1/l2 penalty. Lifted versions of l1/l2 constraints have also been proposed but are still challenging to implement. Inspired by the lifting approach, we propose to split the sparse signals into positive and negative components and apply an l1/l2 constraint to the difference, thereby obtaining a constraint that is easy to implement without smoothing the l1 or l2 norms. We show that a method of multipliers implementation of the resulting model can recover source wavelets that are not necessarily minimum phase and approximately reconstruct the sparse reflectivities. It appears to be robust to the initialization and to small amounts of noise in the data. We also discuss extensions to the Estimation of Primaries by Sparse Inversion (EPSI) convolution model.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/esser2014SINBADlcs/esser2014SINBADlcs.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Tim T.Y. Lin and Rongrong Wang and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {lopez2014SINBADogm,
	title = {Off-the-grid matrix completion},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {This talk discusses a modified rank minimization workflow designed to handle unstructured matrix completion problems. We extend current rank minimization based trace interpolation techniques to optimally handle undersampled irregular data, in such a way that allows us to recover regularized densely sampled data. This is achieved by introducing a regularization operator, that accurately allows us to simulate the effect of an unstructured grid. We provide reconstruction error bounds to demonstrate the potential of our procedure.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/lopez2014SINBADogm/lopez2014SINBADogm.pdf},
	author = {Oscar Lopez and Rajiv Kumar and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2014SINBADrsw,
	title = {Randomized sampling without repetition in time-lapse seismic surveys},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In this talk, we will show a method for acquiring time-lapse data, where we do not have to repeat the survey geometry. Our method works provided our acquisition is randomized, where sources and receivers are at random locations on a computational grid, and provided we know the spatial locations of the shots and receivers. In addition, we show the implications of either (sub)sampling more for the baseline and less for the monitor or vice-versa, and how this sampling scheme affects the 4-D signal.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Spring/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrsw/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrsw.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2014SINBADrst,
	title = {Randomized subsampling in time-lapse surveys and recovery techniques},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {This talk centres on new insights on how we think of acquisition of time-lapse data using ideas from compressed sensing. Specifically, we will show how simultaneous processing of time-lapse data from randomized subsampling gives more reliable estimates of the vintages and time-lapse signal, compared to parallel processing.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrst/oghenekohwo2014SINBADrst.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Haneet Wason and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2014SINBADsgp,
	title = {A scaled gradient projection method for total variation regularized full waveform inversion},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {We propose a modification to the quadratic penalty formulation for seismic full waveform inversion proposed by van Leeuwen and Herrmann that includes convex constraints on the model. In particular, we show how to simultaneously constrain the total variation of the slowness squared while enforcing bound constraints to keep it within a physically realistic range. Synthetic experiments show that including total variation regularization can improve the recovery of a high velocity perturbation to a smooth background model.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Spring/esser2014SINBADsgp/esser2014SINBADsgp.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {kumar2014SINBADsfm,
	title = {SVD-free matrix completion for seismic data reconstruction},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Seismic data interpolation via rank-minimization techniques has been recently introduced in the seismic community. All the existing rank-minimization techniques assumes the underlying grid to be regular. Irregularity is one of the common impediments in acquisition. In this work, we studied the effect of irregularity on structured and show that how we can modify the existing techniques to handle it. Other then irregularity, we often have missing data. We also show that we can tackle both regularization and interpolation issue simultaneously. The objective of this work is to extend our existing method of interpolation on structured grid to unstructured grid. We illustrate the advantages of the modification in existing methodology using a seismic line from Gulf of Suez to obtain high quality results for regularization and interpolation, a key application in exploration geophysics.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADSPRING2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Spring/kumar2014SINBADsfm/kumar2014SINBADsfm.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Oscar Lopez and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2014SINBADtvc,
	title = {Total variation constrained full waveform inversion with continuation},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Adding a total variation constraint to the Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion model proposed by van Leeuwen and Herrmann can improve robustness and remove artifacts by encouraging piecewise smooth solutions. However, if the parameter controlling the strength of the TV regularization is not well chosen, important details can be lost. We investigate continuation strategies that gradually reduce the strength of the TV constraint so that these important details are eventually allowed back into the solution. Preliminary numerical experiments suggest that this can improve the solution path and lead to better velocity models than if TV regularization were not used during the intermediate steps.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/esser2014SINBADtvc/esser2014SINBADtvc.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Llu{\'\i}s Guasch and Tristan van Leeuwen and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2014SINBADuwc,
	title = {Use what{\textquoteleft}s in common: time-lapse FWI with distributed Compressive Sensing},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In this talk, we will extend our joint recovery formulation to FWI in time-lapse seismic, using the modified Gauss-Newton approach. Leveraging ideas from distributed compressive sensing, we exploit shared information in the sparse model perturbations of the baseline and monitor data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/oghenekohwo2014SINBADuwc/oghenekohwo2014SINBADuwc.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Rajiv Kumar and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {li2014SINBADwmg,
	title = {Why the modified Gauss-Newton method?},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {In our earlier work, we develop the modified Gauss-Newton method for FWI, which requires each update of FWI to be sparse in the curvelet domain. Our empirical observation of the MGN method is that it can find us a solution for FWI problem with sparse perturbation of the initial guess without changing the underlying objective. In this talk, we will analyze the MGN method to find out the reason why it can generate a sparse perturbation of the initial model, because sum of spares updates could easily generate non-sparse perturbations. Moreover, we will illustrate when do we expect the modified Gauss-Newton method to yield a solution with sparse perturbation and in what circumstances should we use it in place of other algorithms like standard Gauss-Newton.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2014, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2014/Fall/li2014SINBADwmg/li2014SINBADwmg.pdf},
	author = {Xiang Li and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {esser2013SINBADasr,
	title = {Applications of phase retrieval methods to blind seismic deconvolution},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Phase retrieval is the non-convex optimization problem of recovering a signal from magnitudes of complex linear measurements. Solving convex semi-definite program (SDP) relaxations has been shown to be a robust approach, but it remains too expensive to apply to large problems. We will discuss methods for accelerating computations and explore applications to seismic deconvolution.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/esser2013SINBADasr/esser2013SINBADasr.pdf},
	author = {Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt,
	title = {Estimating 4D differences in time-lapse using randomized sampling techniques},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {Repeatability in the seismic survey and processing has been cited as the main reason for which 4D seismic technology work. In the last decade, concerted efforts have been spent to make the 4D seismic process highly repeatable, without significant success. On the contrary, Compressed Sensing, which is also a relatively new sampling paradigm proposes that one can recover an estimate of a fully sampled signal from a noisy, under-sampled measurements provided the acquisition architecture satisfies some properties. By observing different under-sampled and random measurements from each vintage, corresponding to different acquisition geometries, we show that one can still detect the 4D change in time using recent ideas from Compressed sensing. Using a realistic synthetic model, we show two methods of estimating the 4D difference and compare their relative performance to each other.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt/oghenekohwo2013SINBADedt.pdf},
	author = {Felix Oghenekohwo and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@presentation {kumar2013SINBADwrs,
	title = {Wavefield reconstruction with SVD-free low-rank matrix factorization},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {SINBAD},
	abstract = {As shown in past, we can leverage the ideas from the field of compressed sensing to cast problems like seismic data interpolation or sequential shot data recovery from simultaneous data, as a compressed sensing problem. In this work we will show how we can borrow the same ideas of compressed sensing and cast these problems as matrix completion problems. Instead of sparsity we will show that we can exploit the low-rank structure of seismic data to solve these problems. One of the impediments in rank-minimization problem is the computation of singular values. We will also show how we can solve the rank minimization problems SVD-free. The practical application is divided into three parts: 1. In case of sequential seismic data acquisition, how jittered subsampling helps to recover the better quality data as compared to random subsampling. 2. How the incorporation of reciprocity principles help to enhance the quality of recovered fully sampled data. 3. How we can recover the sequential source data from simultaneous source data.},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SINBADFALL2013, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2013/Fall/kumar2013SINBADwrs/kumar2013SINBADwrs.pdf},
	author = {Rajiv Kumar and Aleksandr Y. Aravkin and Hassan Mansour and Ernie Esser and Felix J. Herrmann}
}
@conference {herrmann2008SINBADitc,
	title = {Introduction to compressive (wavefield) computation},
	booktitle = {SINBAD 2008},
	year = {2008},
	keywords = {Presentation, SINBAD, SLIM},
	url = {https://slim.gatech.edu/Publications/Public/Conferences/SINBAD/2008/herrmann2008SINBADitc/herrmann2008SINBADitc.pdf},
	author = {Felix J. Herrmann and Yogi A. Erlangga and Tim T.Y. Lin and Cody R. Brown}
}
